Wildlife group wants politics ferreted out


A conservation group is asking Gov. Bev Perdue to investigate whether political campaign contributions and influence played a part in how members of the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission got their seats.

The N.C. Wildlife Federation said testimony during the State Board of Elections hearing into former Gov. Mike Easley suggested that former commission member Gary Allen might have offered big donations to the N.C. Democratic Party. in exchange for keeping his seat on the commission, which regulates hunting and fishing.

"If these allegations prove true," said Tim Gestwicki, executive director of the federation, "We call upon Governor Perdue to immediately demand the resignations of any individuals who were appointed under such inappropriate circumstances. She should then appoint duly qualified, representative citizens to serve out any replaced terms."

You must be logged in to post a comment on this blog. If you already have an N&O online user account, click here to log in. Otherwise, click here to register (it's free!).

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Re: Wildlife group wants politics ferreted out

There is growing awareness with various hunting communities in North Carolina that the WRC has veered off track. The current executive director has no background in wildlife management issues, much less a degree in biology. He doesn't hunt, and only started fishing when he began pursuing the job of being director. What hunting experience he has now he gained after becoming director. Whether those hunts were about making nice with fat cats or were inspired by a sudden and previously undetectable love for the sport is open for speculation.

Meanwhile, the current leadership of the Commission are men who are accustomed to bullying their way with money or by citing their friendship with the governor (or powerful kin) as a means of advancing agendas that the biologists who actually care about resource management cannot agree to support.

Maybe no one cares. After all, the demographics in this state are changing and the available land for men and women who can't afford their own vast tracts is shrinking. Or maybe the Wildlife Resources Commission has devolved even as its members have increased because while the increased seats at that table spelled increased donations for the governors, the values that used to support the appointment of men of integrity are no longer part of the current system of state government.

Re: Wildlife group wants politics ferreted out

One major problem with the Wildlife Commission is that it is too large. When created in 1947, the Commission was established at 9 members, one from each of 9 Wildlife Districts to geographically represent the State. All Commissioners were appointed by the Governor. Over the years the General Assembly has added seats for no other reason than to create very attractive appointments that can generate considerable revenue in the form of political donations. There are now 19 seats (4 Senate, 4 House, and 11 Governor appointments), which is inefficent, costly, and unweildly. Here is an obvious place to improve efficiency in State government, save scarce funds, and eliminate patronage appointments of persons with specials interests unrelated to wildlife conservation.

Re: Wildlife group wants politics ferreted out

Perdue isn't about to admit that she reappointed Easley's buddies for $$$.

Re: Wildlife group wants politics ferreted out

You mean they might have to replace the entire wildlife commission???