Recent bills filed in the Senate of note:
S.B. 235: Personal Protection in Restaurants, Sen. Andrew Brock
S.B. 236: Notarized Consent for Minor's Abortion, Sen. Brock
S.B. 237: Voting Materials in English, Sen. Brock
S.B. 259: Interscholastic Sports Open to All Students, Sen. Jim Jacumin
S.B. 262: Expunctions/Purge Online Databases, Sen. Phil Berger
worz you still go in restaurants even though there is a good chance a felon is illegally carrying a firearm? There is this thing called the Constitution and if you deny one of it's parts then you open the door to denying another part. Like the 1st Amendment or even the 4th as a example.
10th Circuit Court of Appeals just made it illegal for your workplace buinesses from preventing you from having a concealed weapon in your vehicle on campus of a workplace.
I could support that IF that same owner HAD to CLEARLY AND BOLDLY post outside that concealed weapons MAY BE in his establishment IF you choose to enter. I would NOT go in GIVEN that information.
Shouldn't the business proprietor have the right to decide whether or not concealed weapons should be in his/her restaurant?
Blog RSS feed
Re: In regards to SB 235 (Personal Protection in Restaurants)
Perhaps my snark wasn't clear.
I don't think concealed weapons should be allowed anywhere at any time by any one (that's not a badged law enforcement officer).
My point is that when a state legislator stood and said smoking should be banned from restaurants, the Right said it was another example of the State robbing property owners and business proprietors of their rights. Yet, there's no such response when Mr. Brock (no relation) says that property owners and business proprietors should have no say in allowing a loaded, concealed and dangerous firearm into their business.
It's hypocrisy and it may well get someone killed.