GOP ad to air Tuesday

Can't you stupid repoblican "Posters" think your yourselves?? All you do is to repeat the lies of your Corporate Masters.

Tell that to Michael Dukakis.

All Obama supporters must read the following, according to which Hillary has better chance than Obama of beating McCain:

April 28, 2008
Poll: Clinton has better chance than Obama of beating McCain
By LIZ SIDOTI Associated Press Writer
Hillary Rodham Clinton has a better chance than Barack Obama of beating Republican John McCain, according to a new Associated Press-Ipsos poll that bolsters her argument that she is more electable in the fall than her rival for the Democratic nomination.

The survey released Monday gives Clinton a fresh talking point as she works to convince pivotal undecided superdelegates to side with her in the drawn-out Democratic primary fight.

Clinton, who won the Pennsylvania primary last week, has gained ground this month in a hypothetical head-to-head match up with the GOP nominee-in-waiting; she now leads McCain, 50 percent to 41 percent, while Obama remains virtually tied with McCain, 46 percent to 44 percent.

Obama wasn't on the ballot in Michigan. Also, if Obama was inable to campaign in Florida, how was he to get his message out to the electorate? Hillary had the name factor in Florida, Obama was still a no name, at that point.

Also, I count going to fundraisers in Florida as campaigning in Florida, but you Clinton people do not.

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2008/04/27/sunday-talk-obama-vows-to-knock-on-more-doors/?mod=WSJBlog#comment-110512

Please refer to: http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/04/28/dean-says-either-clinton-or-obama-will-drop-out-by-june/#respond
“During an interview with Meredith Vieira on NBC’s “Today,” Mr. Dean said that while the party rules say some Democratic delegates can wait until the party’s August convention to decide, that will be too late.”
It’s disingenuous on the part of Mr. Dean to go against the “party rules”, while penalizing Michigan and Florida for breaking those rules by holding their primaries earlier than the scheduled dates. I would rather make sure we elect the right Democratic candidate for the general election, even if it means waiting till the August convention, than rush the nomination process and thereby nominate a flawed candidate who will have trouble defeating McCain in the general election. I also see certain tunnel vision in completely ignoring the Michigan and Florida primaries. Even if we discard those primaries for now, we cannot lose sight of the fact that in the general election, those delegate rich states could be the swing states determining the outcome of the election. I hope the superdelegates will keep that in mind while deciding whether to support Obama or Hillary. Neither Hillary nor Obama campaigned in those states, therefore, playing field was level and what happened in those states should be factored into the decision-making process of the superdelegates. We cannot be legalistic or devoid of common sense; we need to use some judgment when an issue is not black and white. I am an engineer and in the field of engineering, we make estimates or “guesstimates” all the time when the available information is incomplete. The superdelegates need to think more like an engineer than a lawyer!

Let's not pretend that the US Government and even state governments have clean records when it comes to abusing African-Americans for scientific or social purposes. When you look at the body of evidence, you can see where someone like Rev. Wright is coming from when he claims the United States government created AIDS to kill blacks.

Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis in the Negro Male

North Carolina's Forced Sterilization Regime

p.s. Critiquing the United States Government is not racist.

Jeremiah Wright Is a racist if there ever was one. The outrageous lies told by Obama's mentor and hero such as our government developed and is spreading aids to kill blacks and that our government is pushing drugs in black communities to kill blacks is racist as well as a hateful lie. Obama himself lied about Jeremiah Wright's upbringing, saying that Jeremiah Wright was raised in poverty because of white oppression and that's why Wright is so angry, spewing his venom at white people and America. The truth is Wright was raised in a comfortable upper middle class family in Philadelphia. Wright's parents were both successful teachers and they were paid well so the poverty statement is pure BS. Rather than attend the racially mixed Germantown High School which was in his own school district, Wright traveled across town to attend the elite Central High School at 1700 West Olney Ave. Wright was one of the few very privileged to live outside the elite Central school district and still be able attend this elite prestigious school. Wright's racist church is now building him a million dollar mansion right here in what Wright calls the KKK of America. Wright pushes his rabid view that whites are ineradicably racist. Wright never even considers that blacks can be racists just like Wright himself is a racist. Both Jeremiah Wright and Obama embrace "the black victimhood syndrome" mentality and that view being, it's the blue eyed devils fault for all the problems in the black community. Wright screamed G-D damn America and Obama sat there and agreed with his silence. Barack Hussein Obama is truly Jeremiah Wright's little lap dog. Jeremiah Wright shouldn't curse America with his belly and bank account full.

Posted by: Eli

WEll ... just one more about Obama ... not a real long one tho:

Obama claims 7 years of experience in the Illinois legislature working across the aisles bringing people together to get good CHANGES passed -as exemplified by 26 good bills with his name on them passed by the legislature.

However, a local Chicago reporter says all 26 of those bills were passed in ONE Year.

http://wweek.com/editorial/3418/10516/

EXCERPTS:
But what’s interesting, and almost never discussed, is that he built his entire legislative record in Illinois in a single year.

Kingmaker: Illinois State Senate President Emil Jones Jr. takes credit for smoothing Obama’s path to the U.S. Senate.

Republicans controlled the Illinois General Assembly for six years of Obama’s seven-year tenure. Each session, Obama backed legislation that went nowhere; bill after bill died in committee. During those six years, Obama would have had difficulty naming any legislative achievements.

Then, in 2002, dissatisfaction with President Bush and Republicans on the national and local levels led to a Democratic sweep of nearly every level of Illinois state government. For the first time in 26 years, Illinois Democrats controlled the governor’s office as well as both legislative chambers.

The white, race-baiting, hard-right Republican Illinois Senate Majority Leader James “Pate” Philip was replaced by Emil Jones Jr., a gravel-voiced African-American known for chain-smoking cigarettes on the Senate floor.

Jones had served in the Illinois Legislature for three decades. He represented a district on the Chicago South Side not far from Obama’s. He became Obama’s kingmaker.

Jones appointed Obama sponsor of virtually every high-profile piece of legislation, angering many rank-and-file state legislators who had more seniority than Obama and had spent years championing the bills.

During his seventh and final year in the state Senate, Obama’s stats soared. He sponsored a whopping 26 bills passed into law—including many he now cites in his presidential campaign when attacked as inexperienced.

On the stump, Obama has frequently invoked his experiences as a community organizer on the Chicago South Side in the early 1990s.

But, as a state senator, Obama evaded leadership on a host of critical community issues, from historic preservation to the rapid demolition of nearby public-housing projects, according to many South Siders.

End of EXCERPTS

my comments:

Bringing people together to get CHANGES made... = ZILCH

Taking credit for other Senator’s work...Integrity = ZERO

Here's the LONG VERSION of WHAT'S REALLY GOING ON
("The devil is in the DETAILS).

Headline: Obama says YES to Cheney (& GE)(& Westinghouse)

Foreword: I wrote the following comments about an hour before I heard Olberman report that Rush Limbaugh was promoting on his website: RIOTS at the Democratic Convention in Denver

We all know the ECONOMY is the #1 ISSUE in this campaign season.

Since ENERGY is an important basis of economics our nation's Energy Policy is EXTREMELY IMPORTANT...as we have all seen with the increasing cost of FUEL and FOOD engendered by the rise in Oil Prices.

The Mainstream Media has failed to address or air the 3 Presidential candidates' ENERGY POLICIES. (Have YOU heard anything about The Cheney Energy Bill?)

It was passed in 2005...while the Republicans still had control of Congress. Obama Voted FOR the Cheney Energy Bill. McCain Voted FOR it.
Clinton Voted AGAINST it.

Most of us, upon hearing of the EXISTENCE of a CHENEY Energy Bill would...assume it to be...NOT in the best interests of our nation or any of us Not Wealthy humans...i.e. some kind of RIPOFF of the American taxpaying public.

It also seems strikingly ODD that Obama, appearing to be a very LIBERAL Democrat, Voted FOR The Cheney Energy Bill.

Clinton has brought up Obama's YES to Cheney VOTE several times during the televised debates. YET...the News People asking the debate questions never followup by asking Obama: WHY DID YOU VOTE FOR THE CHENEY ENERGY BILL?. They Never followup by asking: What IS the Cheney Energy Bill about?

It is by far One of the most IMPORTANT ISSUES of our time, but the "mainstream media" just doesn't cover it. WHAT is the reason for the mainstream media's SILENCE on an ISSUE so critically important to our future?

I asked myself that question and went looking for answers. This is what I found:

GE owns NBC & MSNBC. Westinghouse owns CBS. GE is the 2nd largest corporation on the planet: BOTH corporations have, for many generations, pumped vast quantities of PRODUCT...$ADVERTISING Dollars...into all forms of media.

GE and Westinghouse are the Major Players in the nuclear industry. An industry that was set to suffer a Slow DEATH...UNTIL...the Cheney EnergyBill gave it "a new lease on life". NO new nukes have been built in the U.S for the past 30 years because the banks would not loan money to build them - too risky.

The Cheney Energy Bill Solved That Problem For The Nuke Industry by GUARANTEEING TAXPAYER Payback of any of the nuke loans that default.

(Given that the Congressional Budget Office rated the risk of default at 50%, or greater...do you think it was GOOD JUDGMENT for Obama to vote FOR it?)

(Given the already substantial economic damage done by the SubPrime mortgage meltdown -what amount of economic damage are we LIKELY to suffer from SubPrime: Not Credit Worthy -lending- to the nuke industry/compounded by the fact that US TAXPAYERS would PAY the full cost of a SUBPRIME Nuke Lending meltdown?)

The nuke industry's plans to build 29 new nuclear power plants are already far advanced. Licensing hearings for the first few nuke plants have already been scheduled.

Second Level Major Players in the Nuke Industry:

Excelon Corp. of Illinois - one of Obama's largest campaign contributors since his earliest days in politics - biggest nuke operator on the planet; they own the nukes in Illinois; they own Con-Ed of New York.

Entergy - Owns many utilities in several Southern states.

3 Consortiums of other nuke industry players.

MSNBC & NBC have become more FAUX than FOX. All day everyday since last October I have seen on MSNBC & NBC..ALL their "reporters" and "news analysts" -(from Joe Scarborough and Mika Berzinski on "Morning Joe"-to Chris Matthews on "Hardball" in the afternoon-to Keith Olbermann in the evening BLATANTLY promoting Pro-Obama PROPAGANDA/ Slamming & smeaaring the Clintons...everyday all day long.

I'm not the only one who noticed. Millions of people noticed and posted their complaints about it on the internet. Last night Bill O'reilly on Fox news said - "MSNBC has become the Obama Network".
(I call MSNBC/NBC -BOP-N---Barack Obama Propaganda Networks.)

In response to...(unspecified...& unreported complaints) about "media bias" against the Clintons, Howard Fineman, TIME magazine & MSNBC "News analyst"---whined to Chris Matthews on "Hardball" last week: Gov. Rendell said to me -"you're from the Obama Network"-they shouldn't be complaining about US being biased against the Clintons WE're Journalists! WE just report the facts. (Pathetic...Fineman
...trying...to convince himself he's not -exactly what he is- a highly paid Propaganda Pusher.)

Obama's 20 year history in politics arose from Chicago, Cook County, Illinois.

The Rezko trial involves charges of extortion, fraud, money laundering, kickbacks, bribes; CRIMES
& Political CORRUPTION (at every level of government City, County, State, National) involving: allegedly,
Rezko, Mayor Daley, Governor Blagojevich, et al for crimes committed in the U.S.; and involving internationally 3 Arabic men: Rezko, Auichi, Alsammarae -for crimes allegedly committed in massive international frauds.

(Auichi was convicted a few years ago in the French Courts of massive fraud/robbery/looting involving the French ELF petroleum company and the U.N. Oil for Food Program. (He's still a billionaire tho.)

Alsammarae was convicted in the Iraqi Courts of looting the Iraq electricity grid while he was the Iraqi Minister of Electricity...under Bush-Cheney's Coalition Provisional Authority. Rezko is accused of being Alsammarae's partner in that looting.

The mainstream media is airing very little coverage of Rezko's -City, County, State, National, and International Fraud/Looting trial.

For example, the Federal Prosecution's main witness testifed last week that Obama and his wife DID Attend a party thrown by Rezko at Rezko's Chicago mansion for his guest of honor AUICHI. Obama has previously stated that he: doesn't remember meeting Auichi. WHY is the mainstream media (TV, in particular) not covering the Rezko trial? WHY have they Still NOT Asked Obama if he DID or DID Not attend that party? WHY have they NOT asked Michelle Obama if she attended that party?

The conclusion I have reached from those and many other FACTS I have gathered from my impartial search is:

GE, et. al; the Corrupt Corporate "establishment"
-is running Obama and McCain for President -because they plan to reap $BILLIONS in RISK-FREE Profits from building 29 new nuclear power plants AND $BILLIONS more in RISK-FREE profits---For The NEXT 30-40 Years---from the HIGHER ELECTRICITY RATES produced by building nuke plants. i.e. The NEXT Big Dick Cheney
MONOPOLY POWER
---ENERGY RIPOFF----
just...waiting in the wings...for Obama or McCain to get elected.

Currently, the mainstream media is PUSHING Obama for President and holding a lid on the BAD NEWS about him. If and when it reaches a point where Obama cannot get the nomination the corporate-controlled media will drop him and start pumping out PRO-McCain Propaganda.

GE, Cheney, et al prefer it to be a NO-RISK Win-Win (for Them) Presidential election WITH Obama vs. McCain. The Media is NOW pumping out: the contest is Over; Obama's the Winner; the Nomination BETTER NOT get "stolen" from Obama or there'll be HELL to Pay and the Democrat candidate will lose in November.

The Obama campaign was caught red-handed playing the race card to win the South Carolina primary
...in a 4 page internal Obama campaign Memo published online by the Huffington Post...but the Media went right on PUSHING the BIG LIE -they blamed the Clintons. Obama has repeatedly played the race card every time he is in danger of losing.

There are indications online that Obama: used MOBS of poor black people cramming into small govt. offices in Chicago during his "organizing" days to get some of the "changes" he wanted; that Code Pink and a group named ReCreate '68 are threatening to mass mobs of 50,000 in Denver to protest/incite riots at the Democratic Convention IF Obama does not get the nomination. DOES Obama have connections to the groups threatenting HELL to pay at the convention if he doesn't get the nomination?...connections that could be covered by...plausible deniability?

Having already...recklessly, despicably, dangerously, played the race card repeatedly --- supposing...Obama does have connections with left wing extremist groups...could electing him President get us -WORSE THAN BUSH-...incitement of interracial strife for purposes of Political Control... incitement of left-wing extremists/ riots for the same purpose...with the MEDIA aiding, abetting, lying and distorting...Reality...just like they are doing now?

Things that don't add up:

If Clinton is "the establishment" candidate -Why is her campaign constantly running out of money while Obama has been rolling in CASH thruout the campaign?

The media tries to cover that by saying: well...her wealthy contributors have already given the maximum amount the law allows -they can't contribute anymore funds.

That's ridiculous. The "establishment" has enough cash to hire all the bundlers they need to go out and rustle up more cash from individuals employed at ALL Their Corporations, and from any other source. The media continues to PUSH the BIG LIE that Obama does not accept money from Lobbyists/Corporations -when a very brief search on Google will quickly turn up detailed confirmation of the fact that he accepts money from the same large corporate sources as the other candidates.

If Clinton is the "establishment" candidate...WHY isn't the corporate-controlled media PUSHING HER for President?

If, since January, Obama has been getting 2X-3X-5X more in campaign contributions from: we the little people
...How Come... he's not getting 2X or 5X MORE VOTES...from we the little people ... in the Primary elections?

Obama's got the money. He's got the MEDIA Propaganda. He's the establishment candidate.

What's wrong with building 29 nuclear power plants?

Hillary Clinton: nuclear can be considered in the future IF they can make it CHEAPER and find a way to safely and permanently dispose of the nuclear waste.

Nuke waste/nuke waste dumps have been a steadily deepening nightmare for the past 50 years. (Google: Hanford WA nuclear waste dump; Rocky Flats CO plutonium, Barnwell South Carolina groundwater nuclear waste dump.

ALL the nuke waste dumps are CLOSED. Nuke waste has been stored ON-SITE at the nuke plants for the past several DECADES; providing several hundred terrorist targets vulnerable to devastating consequences from just ONE RPG.

The nuclear industry is already running a modicum of Pro-Nuke Propaganda Ads. They have bought up a few "environmentalists" & manufactured a lot more -for the LAUNCH of their upcoming NUKE PROPAGANDA CAMPAIGN (The Nukes are GREEN & CLEAN Ad Campaign)-that will start-right after the November Prersidential election.

What can YOU do about it? Copy & Paste this message -email it to everyone on your email list. Google: "North Carolina blogs politics" and post this everywhere you can -post it on Newspaper, TV, and radio blogs. Do the SAME for all the upcoming PRIMARY STATES...as far in advance of the Primary Date as you can.

"Getting off coal to go nuclear is like giving up cigarettes to take up smoking crack" (I wish I knew where I read that quote so I could give credit to the author of it.)

WHY did all the "news" people on FOX spend the months from last October - up to a few weeds ago...PROMOTING...PRAISING...and PUMPING UP Barack Obama? ...

....just like their "friends" on MSNBC & NBC?

Why were the (supposedly) Liberal/Democratic Media AND the Republican/Conservative Media
BOTH Pushing for Obama on TV?...all day everyday?

ANSWER: Conservative Republicans want to get McCain elected. FOX pumped up Obama because they ALREADY HAD plenty of REAL dirt to tear him down with & they began .... dribbling it out ... as soon as it SEEMED like he would be the nominee. (Once he became the nominee FOX would begin pumping out the REAL Dirt so hot & heavy Obama would be sunk long before election day.)

GE; the nuke industry -wants Obama v. McCain so they can be SURE their PLANS to reap BILLIONS from building 29 new nukes AND from the Higher Electricity Rates (for the next 30-40 yrs) that new nukes will produce. New nukes ENABLED by the Cheney Energy Bill, after, 30 years of NO New Nukes.

Obama Voted FOR the Cheney Energy Bill. McCain Voted FOR. Clinton VOTED AGAINST.

GE owns NBC & MSNBC. THAT is Why they have been pumping out PRO-Obama/ Anti-Clinton PROPAGANDA.

ANSWERS

Why McCain called for the ad to be withdrawn:

McCain KNOWS Obama is supposed to be the Democrat nominee.

He WANTS Obama to be the Democratic candidate for President
so he can BE SURE he will win.

He does not want Clinton to be the nominee because he will almost surely LOSE.

HE KNOWS THE FIX IS ... IN Place ... he wants it to succeed.

THE FIX: GE & its TV Networks NBC & MSNBC are running OBAMA AND McCain
for President so they can get McCain elected.

Obama is dirty. He's known for about two years he's in deep trouble
& he will, over time, as the dirt comes out during the Rezko trial ... be sunk politically.

THE DEAL for Obama is: Ok, get the nomination, and then you can have: President McCain's BEST EFFORTS to derail the Rezko trial, put a LID on any further dirt coming out about Obama ... and ... eventually, a la Scooter Libby ... a commutation of the Rezko gang's sentences/or pardons.

I will next post a SHORT version & a LONG version of:
WHAT'S REALLY GOING ON

AS the LONG version of WHAT's REALLY GOING ON SHOWS ... there's a lot more to the Rezko trial than 'just' the usual City, County, State, and National LEVELS of POLITICAL CORRUPTION ...i.e. There's a lot of very strange INTERNATIONAL POLITICAL CORRUPTION involved TOO.

There's nothing in the ad that's racist.
It just shows the SAME video clip of Rev. Wright that has already been shown repeatedly on all the TV Networks and posted all over the web.

Then it says - 2 North Carolina candidates endorsed Obama.
Don't vote for them.

Obama said WRIGHT's remarks (as shown in the video clip) are objectionable, unacceptable, and he repudiates them.

Ok, so what is ...racist... about OTHER PEOPLE finding them Objectionable
TOO? What's ...racist... about OTHER PEOPLE who find them Objectionable
... also finding OBAMA to be ... Objectionable ... and therefore OBJECTING about North Carolina candidates endorsing Obama?

ANSWER: NOTHING. They're entitled to their opinion that Obama's attendance at the Rev. Wright's church for twenty years --- without
any OBJECTION on his part to the Rev. Wright's Objectionable speech --- makes Obama a candidate for President they do not approve of; makes candidates for North Carolina political offices who endorsed a candidate they do not approve of ... objectionable to them TOO.

Why did McCain call for the North Carolina ad to be withdrawn? Why did McCain say the ad was OBJECTIONABLE?

See Next Post for ANSWERS.

Obama - Did He, or Did he Not --- Flip her the finger?

Yes. He did. Replay the video. He breaks out into (feces-eating) smirks & grins ... Several times ... AFTER he flips her off.

AND --- breaks out into those same (feces-eating) smirks & grins
...Several times.... BEFORE he flips her off.

He looks down at the podium several times ... glancing for a few seconds at a time to see where he is in his Script ... sees the BIRD coming up ... & breaks out into smirks.

Scripted. Rehearsed. Asinine. Juvenile. Pathetic.

Obama is lucky that some of his other gaffes will not be aired!

http://www.obamatruth.org/

On taylor's site someone found threating statments against Sen. Hillary CLinton.... these messages were ON OBAMA's OFFICIAL WEBSITE....
something to the effect of: "slit her throat and dump her body in the river".

These are the links, fortunatley, someone took screen shots...how can we let hillary;s camp know about these threats?? AGAIN THESE ARE ON OBAMA's OFFICIAL WEBSITE!!!

GUYS/GALS/////CALL THE DNC..>GIVE THEM THE WEBSITE BELOW(not the screenshots site, but the url for the my.barack....)...ITS THE THIRD ONE... AND TELL THEM THIS IS WHY WE WILL NEVER SUPPORT OBAMA AND HIS THUGS.... 877-336-7200

THE SCREENSHOTS:
http://tinyurl.com/699blo

http://tinyurl.com/5o56kk

THE ACTAUL PAGE:
http://my.barackobama.com/page/commu...ntary#comments

The Charlotte CBS television affiliate is WBTV, not WBT as mentioned in the Dome item. WBT is the A.M. radio station in the same company.

We seem to be sliding into a situation in which people who feel that their ethnic, political or religious group is being roundly criticized by a certain individual or organization do not have the right to respond to the criticisms directed toward them. Ministers, congressmen, newspaper columnists, talk show hosts and others who are in a position to make very specific and sometimes harsh criticisms of American society generally or certain individual citizens in particular, should recognize the right of those they criticize to respond in some reasonable manner.

The two leading Democratic candidates for governor in North Carolina wished to be associated with one particular Democratic campaign for governor. The controversy over Sen. Obama's minister is unfortunate and even politically sensitive, but the issues being discussed are germane to the campaign to lead North Carolina in the next four years because the governor has to carry out his or her executive responsibilities in a manner that does not encroach upon the constitution rights of the people, including freedom of religion and expression.

Rather than demand the removal of the Republican television ad in question, N.C. Democratic supporters of the Obama presidential campaign should express whatever reservations or opposition they may have in regard to some of the statements raised by the candidate's minister rather than blame the other party for wishing to make its own critical commentary about the matter.

I also recall some rather emphatic criticism of the career ministry of Dr. Billy Graham by the Rev. Wright, which merits some discussion since Dr. Graham has ministered to so many of the Presidents whom Sen. Obama wishes to succeed as the country's next chief executive in 2009. No one needs to endorse Dr. Graham's chosen evangelical path in order to compete for any elective office, but it would seem that harsh or extremist criticisms of a minister who has assisted Presidents from Harry S Truman to George W. Bush do deserve some futher editorial commentary.

Fortunately, with important endorsements of Sen. Obama by daughters of both President John F. Kennedy and President Richard M. Nixon, who opposed each other in the historic 1960 election, the Obama campaign and its supporters in North Carolina should be able to move the debate forward effectively in coming days just as the campaign team of Sen. Hillary Clinton is seeking to do in behalf of her own presidential effort.

David McKnight

This is the most disgusting activity and should be investigated!

On taylor's site someone found threating statments against Sen. Hillary CLinton.... these messages were ON OBAMA's OFFICIAL WEBSITE....
something to the effect of: "slit her throat and dump her body in the river".

These are the links, fortunatley, someone took screen shots...how can we let hillary;s camp know about these threats?? AGAIN THESE ARE ON OBAMA's OFFICIAL WEBSITE!!!

GUYS/GALS/////CALL THE DNC..>GIVE THEM THE WEBSITE BELOW(not the screenshots site, but the url for the my.barack....)...ITS THE THIRD ONE... AND TELL THEM THIS IS WHY WE WILL NEVER SUPPORT OBAMA AND HIS THUGS.... 877-336-7200

THE SCREENSHOTS:
http://tinyurl.com/699blo

http://tinyurl.com/5o56kk

THE ACTAUL PAGE:
http://my.barackobama.com/page/commu...ntary#comments
Last edited by s

Go Linda! Can hardly wait till Tuesday. Hey, Libs, Linda Daves got a standing ovation at the Republican 3rd District Convention on Saturday at just the mention of her name. But then who cares what bunch of gun toting,hymn singing right wing cable/satalite TV addicts think?

Right, "the cow jumped over the moon" also. Wright and Moyers, sort of like Hans Christian Anderson writing about interviews with Lucrica Broga and Machiavelli. Only problem is you liberals can dish fairy tales out to each other, but can't take a spoon full of truth from the Right. Linda Daves is right on target, Perdue and Moore are supporting an extream liberal who is about one step from socialism/nationalism.

No media except Bill Reilly have had the courage to show this!

Oh, but you WILL listen to Dan Rather, Moyers, Cronkite, Carter, Couric,
Rosie, etc. Right? STRIVE to be SMARTER...

Kudos to Senator McCain, WRAL, WSOC, and WBT. Deciding not to run this ad is an indication of real moralist integrity and the courage to focus on real issues; rather than distorted lies.

The truth is the only thing to fear is fear itself. If you think that all liberals lie, then one can say that Senator McCain is a liar. And that's not true. He asked to not have it played. Like Senator Obama said McCain is better than Hillary.

As far as the Rev goes, a viewing of Bill Moyer interview with the Rev can be seen on Comcast On Demand until 5/6/08.
I am a liberal; but I take into account what the controversy is and then decide. Most uniformed people do the same. rather than let Sean Hannity. Bill O'Reilly, Pat Buchanan tell me how to think!

Excellent! WILL SEND MO MONEY!!! Was waiting to see it first...

Folks the lieberal media has been tapped to pander to Rev. Wright and make him SEEM nice and easy...ITS A LIE, thats what lieberals DO! THEY LIE to try to explain themselves...Moyers is an IDIOT also!

Rev. Jeremiah Wright was on Bill Moyer's Journal last night. Full video, in two 1/2 hour segments, and transcript on the site.

If Daves ever bothered to watch she would not run this ad.