Blogs

newsobserver.com blogs

Under the Dome

Inside the Dome Who's who Polling central

Ethics commission takes Merritt to court

The State Ethics Commission is asking a Superior Court judge to prevent State Auditor Les Merritt from investigating a claim of preferential treatment for Lt. Gov. Beverly Perdue, the Democratic nominee for governor.

The suit claims that Merritt's office has a conflict of interest because its investigations chief, Frank Perry, left the ethics commission a year ago. The suit also claims that Merritt, a Republican seeking re-election, "denigrated" the commission in an hour-long interview with a radio station.

It is a rare case in which one state agency is suing another, reports Dan Kane.

"The commission welcomes an independent and impartial investigation by an appropriate entity that is free from actual and/or perceived conflicts of interest," the suit said.

More after the jump.

–––––

The auditor began investigating the commission after receiving a hotline tip in the fall of 2007 that Will Polk, Perdue's general counsel, visited the office and was allowed to look at her financial disclosure statements alone in a closed office. Ethics commission officials said visitors typically review the files in an open conference room, at times with a staffer observing, but in Polk's case the conference room was in use, so he was allowed to use a vacant office.

The financial disclosure statements are intended to inform the public about possible and potential conflicts of interest that public officials may have. Recent scandals in state government led to a new ethics law that requires public officials to disclose their financial interests, and the officials can face criminal penalties for lying or providing misleading information on their statements.

The News & Observer inquired about Polk's visit and found that a staffer, Amanda Thaxton, had made a notation about Polk's closed-door review in an electronic visitor's log. That notation was later removed by Kathleen Edwards, an assistant commission director, who said it didn't belong in the log.

Hours after the N&O's initial inquiry about the log, commission Executive Director Perry Newson fired Thaxton. She said she was given no explanation for the firing, and thinks it was in part retaliation for making the notation.

Newson has said Thaxton was not fired in retaliation. Newson could not immediately be reached for comment today.

Kris Bailey, the deputy state auditor leading the investigation, said the lawsuit is without merit. He said that Perry has recused himself from the case and that the commission is misrepresenting Merritt's radio interview.

"The issue here is that the state auditor's office is conducting an investigation that I believe we are by statute obligated to conduct," Bailey said. "I believe that at the end of the day, they don't want this investigation completed, therefore they are not making people and records available. We believe there needs to be cooperation and transparency."

The commission suggests that the investigation be turned over to the "Legislative Services Officer." That would be George Hall, the longtime legislative services director. He does not typically conduct investigations.

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Re: Ethics commission takes Merritt to court

North Carolina has an Ethics Commission? Do Jim Black's unindicted co-conspirators know about this?

JAT

Re: Unethical Ethics Commission

they cannot shed business as usual, because that's the way its been for 100+ years in Rawleigh. Crookedness and criminals run the show in Rawleigh, and everyone knows it now.

dont EVER vote for another NC democrat, they've RUINED our once great state!

Unethical Ethics Commission

It would be one thing to block tainted results from an investigation, but why fear an investigation? Incredible.

This is why I'm beginning to subscribe to the politics of a bumper sticker I saw on the back of an old pick-up in Texas. It said, "Don't re-elect nobody, not even your momma!"

When are people going to get tired of the arrogant, business-as-usual in Raleigh?

Re: What are they afraid of?

A couple of years, Isaac? Try a couple of months.

Some of the State Ethics Commission upper management is engaging in VERY questionable behavior. First they give preferential treatment to a member of a gubernatorial candidate's staff, then they fire an employee for making a factual notation in a log?! Something doesn't add up. Let's leave politics out of this and look at it objectively. The executive director and assistant director obviously have something to hide. If you can't see that then you are being blinded by partisanship...and this is coming from a hardcore Democrat!!

They should have to play by the rules like everyone else. Let's not forget what we should have learned from Jim Black's case. Whether he was investigated by a Republican auditor or not...the fact remains that he is GUILTY!

Yup, THAT state auditor!

And this from an auditor!

Folks think that his investigation of the Ethics Commission would be fair and square? I sure don't.

Re: Ethics commission takes Merritt to court

You mean this auditor?

The North Carolina Democratic Party would like to extend best wishes to State Auditor Les Merritt on the retirement of his side business.

Mr. Merritt announced in May that on June 30th he would end on the practice of providing investment advice to private clients.

This followed scorching public scrutiny after Mr. Merritt approved a press release advertising his public job to lure clients at an investment firm through which he and his son provide services. The state’s largest newspapers joined NCDP Chair Jerry Meek in 2005 in calling for Merritt to stop compromising his public job with ads featuring a coupon to receive a free hour of consultation services.

Merritt earns $115,000 a year, three times the annual income of the average North Carolina family. Now that Merritt has decided to stop moonlighting, maybe he could give the people of the state his undivided attention.

When we have a Democratic Auditor, Les Merit will be the first one investigated.

Re: What are they afraid of?

Whether or not they have an ethics problem, they have good reason to worry about an "investigation" from an admittedly hostile agency with whom they've been engaged in a feud over the past couple of years. Under that circumstance, they should worry that even if they didn't already have an ethics problem -- one would be found.

Re: Ethics commission takes Merritt to court

smellin more coverup here...

it is clear that the democrats do NOT like having a republican AUDITOR, especially with his great performance. they will do whatever they can to keep facts and truth from being exposed. it's obvious.

dont EVER vote for another NC democrat!

What are they afraid of?

Seems like the Commission may think they have an ethics problem - or two.

Cars View All
Find a Car
Go
Jobs View All
Find a Job
Go
Homes View All
Find a Home
Go
Advertisements