Under the Dome

Poll worker mistake caused fears of fraud, but no double-vote

Updated: After taking a closer look, elections officials are convinced that a Sampson County man did not, as previously suspected, cast two ballots – one during early voting and another on Election Day – and instead think a mistake by a poll worker created confusion.

Sylvia Thornton, chairwoman of the county elections board, said a poll worker gave a voter the ballot of someone with the same last name and had voted early. That sparked concerns that a person had voted twice.

"It was a mistake, but we've taken care of it, and every vote has been counted correctly," Thornton said.

The votes could get a closer look during canvass, when county boards meet to overlook unofficial results released Election Day to make sure there are no irregularities.

Donna Mashburn, Sampson County elections director, said a precinct official notified her of the complaint immediately after the problem was realized the morning.

13,649 ballots were cast at one-stop sites in Sampson during early voting, and the complaint was the first of its type in the county so far this election, Mashburn said.

Johnnie McLean, deputy director of the state Board of Elections, said  people casting multiple ballots has happened in the past, but only infrequently and usually as a result of a mistake by a poll worker or by elderly people who vote twice by accident.


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Glad to know they caught this ONE, however....

...this only stops a person from voting more than once. It does NOT stop one person voting for a registered voter who has not voted, or for voting for a recently deceased voter who is still listed as "eligible".

Voter ID

And this is why there must be voter ID. This is not the only case of this happening, so the election is flawed to say the least. I hope voter ID will be required by 2016.

Did not work...

someone got to vote who was  not registered.  An ID woulda shown

that the person was not the voter and the voter coulda voted a regular


It's good to know...

... that the checks and balances we currently have in work. Glad the suituation was flagged so quickly. It's proof we don't have to invest millions and millions of taxpayer money while disenfranchising people just to satisfy rightwing voter suppression desires masquerading as concern for ballot integrity.

Cars View All
Find a Car
Jobs View All
Find a Job
Homes View All
Find a Home

Want to post a comment?

In order to join the conversation, you must be a member of Click here to register or to log in.