Who fired Debbie Crane?
In a meeting with newspaper editors Wednesday at the Executive Mansion, Gov. Mike Easley offered a new take on the recent firing of Crane, a former spokeswoman for the state Department of Health and Human Services, reports Matthew Eisley.
Easley said Crane’s firing wasn’t his idea, which contradicts the accounts of others involved.
“It wasn’t me,” he insisted.
Crane, 48, was fired March 4 amid the political fallout of a News & Observer investigation into failures of the state’s mental-health system. Her dismissal revolved around the Easley administration’s attempts to persuade Carmen Hooker Odom, the former health and human services secretary, to talk with The News & Observer about what the administration says was her opposition to 2001 mental-health reforms.
Easley on Wednesday said DHHS fired Crane at the urging of the governor’s chief of staff because she had inappropriately talked Hooker Odom out of being interviewed and she failed to produce agency documents.
Read more after the jump.
–––––
Dempsey Benton, who succeeded Hooker Odom as DHHS secretary, has said it wasn’t his idea to fire Crane, his agency’s top public information officer. He said she had done a good job.
The firing order, Benton said, came from Franklin Freeman, Easley’s chief of staff.
Freeman has confirmed that — but said he was acting at the governor’s direction.
And Crane, who worked for the state for 18 years, has said Benton told her Freeman told him the governor had “lost confidence in her” and wanted her fired.
But when asked about it Wednesday, Easley said Crane’s firing was Freeman’s idea all along.
"We had the [interview] worked out, and then [Crane] calls up there and essentially told [Hooker Odom] that it was going to be a witch hunt to make her look bad,” Easley said. “And that sent Franklin Freeman off the deep — I mean, not — he just was — he wasn’t going to put up with that.”
Easley said he thought it was common knowledge that Freeman “was fit to be tied.”
“We’re trying to get information out there, and you’ve got a public information officer who is undercutting it, undermining it,” he said. “That’s why Franklin said, ‘I don’t have any more confidence in her.’ He said he wanted her out of there, and that’s what they did. I think it was the right decision. I support what he did.”

Comments
Re: Easley: I didn't fire Crane
April 14, 2008 - 10:35pm — almanOur state is becoming the laughing stock of the country. This is ridiculous. He said he said he said. Accountability is lacking. Leadership is lacking. Can someone please take it on the chin and put the rest of us our of our misery?
ElectriCities is suffering from serious lack of accountability as well. Where is the leadership in this state that steps us and corrects what is wrong in the interest of the taxpayers?
www.bluenc.com
Electric Cities' Future at Stake
Re: Easley: I didn't fire Crane
April 11, 2008 - 9:29am — ryanteaguebeckwithComment deleted for mildly disturbing imagery and general poor taste.
— RTB
Re: Easley: I didn't fire Crane
April 11, 2008 - 9:08am — FFC1304Those are VALUES instilled in NC from the days of the VILE Jim Hunt, who still points and grunts. HOW did they EVER let HIM get so much manipulated CONTROL??? Sleazely is his child.
Re: Easley: I didn't fire Crane
April 10, 2008 - 8:46pm — Isaac136But "honorable and truthful" are not highly valued by Franklin Freeman and Mike Easley. What is wanted from state employees by the Easley administration is that each employee understands that his or her standing is directly related to how well he or she serves Easley, not the state, not the citizens. Forget public service; it's about service to Easley. I think he lost perspective about what it is to be a public servant long before he got to the governor's office. To him, "public service" seems to mean using public servants to cater to his interests. He doesn't seem to get the distinction between actions or statements that boost Easley's image as opposed to actions or statements that are meant to support state law. Crane did get the distinction -- and of course that meant she had to go.
Re: Easley: I didn't fire Crane
April 10, 2008 - 8:25pm — kearns3606Debbie Crane is an honorable and truthful individual.
Re: Easley: I didn't fire Crane
April 10, 2008 - 5:34pm — rudisill49C'mon Mike, start telling the truth, and things will get better.
Re: Easley: I didn't fire Crane
April 10, 2008 - 1:58pm — JohnHoodSorry, meant Freeman was "chief of staff." The chief of the state is, of course, Marc Basnight.
Re: Easley: I didn't fire Crane
April 10, 2008 - 1:58pm — JohnHoodI know the governor's latest story may seem confusing, but the truth isn't hard to figure out if you examine the situation logically.
Mike Easley did not fire Crane.
Franklin Freeman, his chief of state, did not fire Crane.
Dempsey Benton, his secretary of HHS, did not fire Crane.
So, actually, Debbie Crane was never fired. She and many others are under the mistaken impression that she is no longer an employee of HHS. As a matter of fact, she is. And Debbie should report to work tomorrow morning.
Though, after such a long and unauthorized absence, she might well get fired.
Re: Easley: I didn't fire Crane
April 10, 2008 - 1:37pm — j1c2kpso who is running the show, Frankie or Mikey?
Re: Easley: I didn't fire Crane
April 10, 2008 - 1:34pm — j1c2kpI think the honorable guv might need a larger shovel...
Re: Easley: I didn't fire Crane
April 10, 2008 - 1:23pm — Isaac136Oh please. What a colossal jerk.