Easley got what he wanted


Former Gov. Mike Easley's attorney said Easley got what he asked for in a referral to prosectors.

"I got what I asked for," said Thomas Hicks, an attorney for Easley

Hicks surprised the Board of Elections on Thursday by asking them to refer the case to the Wake County District Attorney. Board chairman Larry Leake mentioned Easley by name as someone who may have committed criminal acts.

Hicks told reporters that investigators should focus on Easley friend McQueen Campbell, who testified that Easley asked him to falsify invoices to pay for repairs to Easley's Raleigh home. Easley said the allegation is false.

Board chairman Larry Leake said the board had received evidence that suggests Easley or others may have committed a crime.

"This board has received evidence which, if believed, would tend to indicate that criminal violations of our election laws and campaign finance laws have occurred on the part of Mike Easley and perhaps others," Leake said.

Easley supporter and friend McQueen Campbell testified that Easley told him to file a false invoice for campaign flights to pay for repairs done to Easley's Raleigh home. Easley said the allegation is false.

Campbell has essentially admitted to a crime. The question is whether Easley was involved.

"I think McQueen Campbell is where the emphasis should be placed," Hicks said.

You must be logged in to post a comment on this blog. If you already have an N&O online user account, click here to log in. Otherwise, click here to register (it's free!).

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Re: Easley got what he wanted

I wonder if the Campbell family will change their voter registration to Rebublican now that the Easley group has tried to switch all the attention to McQueen. Be a big boy Mikey and accept responsibility for your actions.

Re: Easley got what he wanted

Does anyone actually think that Easley wanted this to go to DA? No, he had a heads up that it was going anyway so they tried to get out ahead of the story. SO TRANSPARENT. That's bad PR - at best.