For now, Democrats plan to attack Sen. Richard Burr on the economy.
Eric Schultz, a spokesman for the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, took issue with the headline of a previous post on Burr's chances in 2010.
He rattled off several criticisms of Burr: The controversial ATM statement and his votes against President Obama's stimulus package, the Senate budget resolution, and the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act.
"North Carolinians deserve two senators who will work to get this economy working again," he said. "Not one who stands in the way at every turn."
Several things were notable about the criticisms. They focused on contrasts between Burr and Obama, they centered on the economy and they were recent.
Of course, things change. At this point in the 2008 election cycle everyone thought the race would be about illegal immigration.




Re: DSCC: We have lines of attack
Still not a majority there Gosh - same line you earlier...
Gosh - Who would you prefer being our US Senator, currently in the debate to run against Burr, that you think would do a better job than Burr...
Because I think your answer will indicate that you are nothing of a blind liberal on the federal level and a "moderate" on the state level, because your arguments are so inherently flawed that you can no longer defend the Democrats on the state level.
I hate to tell you, but North Carolina Democrats are only following suit on the national level, only North Carolina's Democrats get caught much more frequently...
Again, not defending the Republican party as I am not a Republican, I am a conservative, and yes I would enjoy to educate you as to the differences.