Cowell reforms ethics policy


State Treasurer Janet Cowell has announced a series of policy changes meant to increase transparency into her office.

Cowell announced four policy changes meant to increase public insight into the areas where the state's money managers interact with the private sector.

"The top priority for this administration is transparency, ethics and accountability," said Cowell, a Democrat. "These policies represent additional steps in instilling public confidence in our investment-making decisions."

The changes come after disclosures that Cowell fired her chief investment officer, Pat Gerrick. The termination came after Gerrick reimbursed Cowell's office $3,000 for personal phone calls and updated her state ethics disclosure to show that she had travel paid for by non-state employees who were managers of the state's retirement fund.

—————

The changes are:

* Two-year revolving door ban: The treasurer, senior executive staff and key investment division staff are prohibited from doing business with the treasurer's office for two year years after they leave employment.

* Disclosure of third-party reimbursements: Requires the treasurer, senior executive staff and key investment officers disclose third party-reimbursements for travel.

* Travel Policy changes: Prohibits third party reimbursements from a contractor or investment manager doing business with the state, requires full disclosure of reimbursements for all employees and moves approval and retention of all travel records to the Financial Operations office.

* Placement Agency policy: Requires full disclosure of external investment managers to disclose the names of placement agents as well as any fees paid to those agents.

You must be logged in to post a comment on this blog. If you already have an N&O online user account, click here to log in. Otherwise, click here to register (it's free!).

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Re: Cowell reforms ethics policy

Pat Gerrick was also fired by the State of Indiana prior to the NC position. And, who knows if she had "problems" with other employers in the interim? Just remember that the dems gave Gerrick a nice $51,000 bonus, in addition to her $350,000 annual salary, while her investments in the state pension plan lost $17 Billion last year (20% of the pension fund's value) and lost another $4 Billion during the first quarter of this year. Don't you just love those affirmative action hires?

Re: Cowell reforms ethics policy

I am just wondering whe they are going to get around to real ethic reform within the ncdot an also amoung the state senators & respresentives in the state legisture so as to get completely rid of the special instrest camapign contributions that buys most any state legisture in the legisture votes for any agenda that they see fit to purchase . an the taxpayers considerations be damned the legisture has been sent to RALEIGH TO RESPRESENTE THE PEOPLE OF THIS STATE AN NOT JUST THE SPECIAL INSTREST BUSINESSES LOBBYIST. BIG MONEY BIG CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS & BEGET BIG FAVORS IN THE LEGISTURE THANK YOU

Re: Cowell reforms ethics policy

don't you think that we have carried this affirmative action a little bit too far

$340,000 for an individual who cannot get her own cell phone and doesn't have the brains to pay her own way on trips AND has other things we are not aware of such ala Mike Easley. Or is that stuff going to be pushed under the rug for affirmative action reasons.

This reminds me a lot of the United Way of Charlotte Director being fired
Richard Moore has a lot of explaining to do about this hire.
gee

Re: Cowell reforms ethics policy

not true if she increases investments
add the terms "in an ethical and upfront manner"
In this case like the rest of the world the state's investments have gone down.
By the way, why would an individual, who makes over $300,000 a year, mickey mouse around for this little amount, You know what this shows- the fired employee was there because she knew somebody and was female not because she had the brains, which she showed she did not have losing a $300,000 job for $3000 in personal phone calls... gee

The show is great

...as long as she increases the state's investments...she's doing her job.