Comp time bill coming due

Excuse my ignorance, but since when is being compensated for time worked a "PERK"??? If I work a sixty hour week in the public sector, I just made twenty hours of overtime pay, at time-and-a-half. If I work sixty hours on my state job, I don't get overtime, I get comp time, at 1:1. I'd rather be getting paid for it, so how is this a perk? Most state employees who are earning overtime, because of more work to do with less staff, and the one's who are there, now have furlough time to get off the books!

"To clarify, comp time is NOT used towards retirement, it is forfeited at the end of the year or sooner. Unused sick leave is used for retirement. Effectively, you get to use all of your sick leave before you turn in your retirement paperwork."

That is addressed in the article:

All employees can substitute comp time for sick leave or vacation time, protecting those balances for the future. They can also use comp time to protect weeks of bonus leave that many state workers have received in lieu of raises since 2002.

Which, if you read the article the way the writers want you to, appears as if state employees are "gaming" the system. But what the writers of this article so casually refused to acknowledge is: if an employee is in a department that is so understaffed that extra hours of work are demanded (however it's compensated), actually using the hours of vacation, sick or comp time that have accrued is not as easy as it sounds.

In other words, there is hardly ever a "good" time to take the days off, and regardless of rules and regulations protecting an employee from arbitrary termination, someone who does take time off frequently, even authorized time, is flirting with unemployment. There's more than one way to skin a cat, and there's more than one way to get rid of an employee who seems to be less "dedicated" than others.

So, my question for Dan Kane and David Raynor (or Mark) is: if an employee finds his or herself in a situation where they can't use (all) their comp time before it expires, do you think it's fair that they lose said compensation? That would mean that the State was able to work them for nothing, wouldn't it?

Comp time is not a perk, it is deferred compensation. The State is basically saying, "I will gladly pay you later for work you do for me today." Rolling those deferred dollars into the State's accumulated debt total is fine and even accurate, but trying to portray this as a "benefit granted" to "powerful special interests" is patently unfair and inaccurate.

It seems by the number of comments, that the N&O article has misled the public on this subject. I was especially taken aback when someone retires that the comp time is added to their retirement. It seems that the N&O article raises more questions than answers. I'm not a state employee, but why raise these questions knowing that NC is going through its worst economic period in its history. The lawmakers know about this, but no one wants to challenge it because they do not want to be the one who ends this practice. But something must be done. I feel for state employees because they are getting squeezed from all different directions, even giving up some of their pay and taking unpaid time off to help with the budget, while the state is going up on health benefits. They should have saw this coming down the road.

This article was very misleading. Many state employees are not permitted to accrue comp time. I often work 60+ hour weeks but do not receive any compensation for it. Also, comp time is still saving the state money. Overtime or additional shifts would cost much more.

Also, I don't know what whack job would look at SAS's unlimited sick leave policy and say that state employees have a better deal. State employees earn 1 sick day per month. Sure, they can count as time worked towards retirement, which encourages employees not to take sick days unless they have to. SAS encourages employees to take sick days whenever they feel bad as a precaution. Also, what are the odds that younger employees will even get their pension?

The truth is state government is understaffed, with workers that are underpaid and have poor benefits. State government continues to lose its best workers to private industry, which is largely to blame for the inefficiencies in state government.

ktuscan, pure FUD. Back up your wide flung net with facts, not misinformation. Which agency do you work for, and how much waste is there? This article is right on when it states the Legislature is reluctant to take take on State employees.

There has to be limits. State workers have always complained that their pay is less than the private sector. I would love to have a comp system like this but I don't. Keep up the good work exposing the truth.