Clinton's Easley ad

www.paulvclinton.com

Yes We Can!

First Question for the Governor, whom I respect and admire:

In 2004, in endorsing John Edwards in Iowa, you stated that you would be glad to finally have a Presidential nominee you could "run with, and not from."

At least two of the times you have been on the statewide ballot in North Carolina, Bill Clinton was the Presidential Nominee of the Democratic Party. Did you run with or from Bill Clinton, and would you run with or from Hillary?

Easley made such a point to not even been seen with others that HAD the dem nomination in the past now he chooses to end his career on a low note. I can kinda understand their connection. Easley has failed mental health and the mentally ill in this state and Hillary obviously has some sort of mental illness seeing how she constantly makes up stories or just can't remember the details. I believe whether "sleep deprived" or not one would know if they had been shot at or not. One would also know that their husband signed the NAFTA agreement that cost the United States including North Carolina many jobs. NAFTA gave us the SHAFTA Whether Governor Easley its your choice to support whom you wish, but by supporting Senator Pinoctress you are only showing your lack of integrity in that she has none and you think that is so great! Like I said way to go to end your Governorship of NC on a low note!
Since Hillary is so big on the gas tax holiday let's see if she can talk Easley into doing away with the NC gas tax which is almost twice the federal tax and by the way one of the highest of all states!

How much money has Clinton herself taking from PACS?
How many years have Hillary and Bill been married? Longer than Obama was a member of UCC. So does it really make you a strong woman to stay with a man that blatantly disrespects you? Is it sound judgement to take that kind of abuse over and over? Are you really strong or dumb and desperate?

Please refer to:
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/05/01/the-early-word-former-dnc-chair-to-support-obama/#more-4985
By the recent denunciation of Rev. Wright, Obama raises more questions than answers them and reinforces what Rev. Wright said about him in that he is a politician who does what a politician does to get elected. One, I thought Obama considered Rev. Wright to be like an uncle who occasionally says crazy things. If that's true, how can he disown an uncle? Second, according to New York Times, Obama was under pressure "from uncommitted superdelegates, several demanding that the candidate speak out more forcefully", therefore, the main reason for denouncing Rev. Wright was to revive his faltering campaign. Third, according to New York Times, "Theirs (Obama and Rev. Wright's)was a long and painful falling out, marked by a degree of mutual incomprehension, friends and aides say. It began at the moment Mr. Obama declared his candidacy, when he abruptly uninvited his pastor from delivering an invocation, injuring the older man’s pride and fueling his anger." This again proves the point that Obama is just like any other politician who will do anything to get elected and he has the nerve to criticize Hillary when she acts like a politician! Fourth, it is disconcerting and a reflection on Obama's character that he can break the bond of a 20 year relationship just to make some political points. Fifth, I wonder about Obama's judgment that he never ceases to brag about. How come he kept going to Rev. Wright's church for 20 years and kept listening to his hateful, anti-patriotic, racist and anti-Semitic sermons and even allowed his little children with impressionable minds to listen to all the trash talk? Sixth, in his now famous "race speech", not too long ago, Obama clearly said that he could not disown Rev. Wright anymore than he could disown the black community and that he could not disown Rev. Wright anymore than he could disown his white grandmother, so how come he found it so compelling to disown now Rev. Wright---a pastor who has been his spiritual mentor for 20 years? If that's not a poltical move, I don't know what is! We are so much into political correctness that we will support a black candidate at any cost, even if he is hypocritical, speaks from both sides of his mouth and will say and do anything just to get elected. If Hillary were attending a church where the pastor spewed hateful, unpatriotic, anti-Semitic and racist remarks, we would raise a hell like there is no tomorrow and also punish her at the polling booth. I see a phenomenon of reverse discrimination at work and will pay a heavy price for it in the long term if we end up nominating the wrong Democratic candidate for the general election. Republicans will definitely "swiftboat" the Rev. Wright issue in the general election, for they are known to play dirty and Democrats are known to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.

You won't see this on any ad but pay attention!

Want to Buy a Superdelegate? They are for Sale and Obama Spends up Big!
Superdelegates can accept PAC donations from candidates. As expected, Obama is the biggest donater to the superdelegates. So yes, SD can be purchased and Obama has bought a lot of them with fat donations. So the King of Lies & Division who likes to fool people into thinking he is so ethical "without ties to lobbyists" (thats a lie) has no problem in BUYING superdelegates.

http://www.upi.com/NewsTrack/Top_New...onations/6691/

Quote:
The Illinois senator's political action committee has donated $710,900 to superdelegates since 2005, compared to his New York colleague's PAC donations of $236,100, McClatchy Newspapers reported Saturday.
http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/a...52/1215/NEWS15

Quote:

The study found that the presidential candidate who gave more money to the superdelegates received their endorsements 82% of the time. That's based on a review of elected officials who are serving as superdelegates and who had endorsed a candidate as of Feb. 25.

I think Hillary's ads have been wonderful and completely agree about Obama and Wright. But come on, have a sense of humor, I couldn't help but laugh when I heard Easley use that word. He obviously meant it as another word for wimp, not anything to do with sexual orientation, but I knew as soon as I heard it that he would take some heat for it.

Whether Easley used the wrong word or not is besides the point. Hill's got real courage and fight. By contrast, Obama's late and feeble handling of the Wright issue utterly looks like exactly what wright said: Obama making political decisions after working out the spin with axelrod. Its painfully obvious: Wright keeps saying the same things -- for 20 years, on the tapes Obama took to Harvard to study him, in the clips last month and this weekend. Obama just now, when it's hurting him big time while he's already tanking, decides to divorce him. Oh, sure, that's a principled stand on the issue.

I'm not able to watch on my computer now, but I trust the "pansy" line didn't make the cut.