Christian won't face charges for portrait


The SBI has ended its probe into the purchase of portrait by former state mental hospital director Patsy Christian without action.

The investigation was requested by the state Department of Health and Human Services in June following reports in The News & Observer about a painting of herself that Christian commissioned from J. Lee Harris, a hospital nurse who sidelined as an artist, reports Michael Biesecker.

The artwork was paid for using vending machine revenue from John Umstead Hospital that the state budget manual says should be spent to benefit patients.

Following public uproar about the portrait, Christian resigned her position as chief executive officer of Central Regional Hospital in Butner and was reassigned to a newly created position within the department at 95 percent of her former salary.

DHHS Secretary Dempsey Benton ordered that the portrait not hang in the new hospital for which it was commissioned and that state money paid for the artwork be recovered. Harris refunded the $572 she was paid for the "executive portrait" and its gilded frame.

Though state law explicitly forbids the awarding of state service contracts to state employees, Erik Hooks, an assistant SBI director, wrote in an Aug. 14 letter that he had concluded "no further inquiry by the SBI is necessary at this time."

More after the jump.

–––––

Hooks wrote that he "will rely on DHHS to continue to evaluate internal controls" and that the department should contact him if "information regarding criminal activity" comes to the attention of administrators.

Wake County District attorney Colon Willoughby, who was consulted by Hooks about the potential for criminal charges in the case, said he saw no need to prosecute Christian or Harris.

"It looked like more of a management issue to me than something that rose to the level of a criminal matter," Willoughby said.

Last week, Christian was dispatched to Goldsboro as part of a two-person team sent to help at Cherry Hospital, which is in trouble with federal regulators following the death of one patient and the assault of another.

As for what may now be the most infamous portrait in state government, the department will now say only that it is in private hands.

You must be logged in to post a comment on this blog. If you already have an N&O online user account, click here to log in. Otherwise, click here to register (it's free!).

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Re: Christian won't face charges for portrait

Comment deleted for profanity.

— RTB 

Re: Christian won't face charges for portrait

Dempsey Benton should be fired before sunset.

Re: Christian won't face charges for portrait

What kind of world do we live in that makes it o.k. to steal from mentally ill patients?? Many of them have so little to start with, many look forward to obtaining clothes from the clothing room. I bet they'd think they had won the lottery if they had $572.oo. Some families don't even visit because they don't have the gas, even before prices went up. Patients are often readmitted because they can't afford their meds......But she's sent to CH to help "fix" things?? Where are the patient advocates when you REALLY need one????

Re: Christian won't face charges for portrait

But Ms. Sudderth is Reassigned?????????????? Maybe CH does need to close.

Re: Christian won't face charges for portrait

Let's see now. Jackie S. hasn't been charged with obstruction of justice. Dr. Berg hasn't been charged with assault. It's o.k. that the former DIRECTOR of the hospital took money intended to benefit patients. I've had staff be investigated for an alleged missing nutty bar. What's wrong with this picture????

Re: Christian won't face charges for portrait

Considering the weak "discipline" the state has bandied about at Cherry and these hospitals in general, I'm not really surprised at all.

Re: Christian won't face charges for portrait

No lets just allow her to continue working for the state at 95 % of her salary. As a private provider should something like this happens in and agency I would fire the person. Because it is embezzling , stealing etc. etc. etc.

Re: Christian won't face charges for portrait

Any one to use patient money for their own "blown out of proportion" ego should be charged with stealing or exploitation, not transferred. That money is for "forgotten" patients...for patients that have nothing and there are many of them. And it's all that Cherry hospital needs...someone who doesn't give a hoot about patients to give advice on how to get out of the trouble they're in.

Re: Christian won't face charges for portrait

Thank goodness. This was the dumbest case ever, blown completely out of proportion.

Re: Christian won't face charges for portrait

wow what a surprise I have been investigated at Cherry because out of over a thousand bucks a patient spent while I was supervising his shopping trip, a mere 60 cents was unaccounted for ( he put it in a vending machine, which do not give receipts) but this employee admittedly took money earmarked for patients and no charges are forthcoming. now the public knows that an honest employee has no chance at Cherry or any state facility

View All » Top Jobs
Quick Job Search
Enter Keyword(s):
City:  State:
Select a Category: