Burr keeps pushing his GI bill


Republican Sens. Richard Burr of North Carolina and Lindsey Graham of South Carolina cribbed a few details today from a Democratic colleague for their version of the GI bill, which helps pay for college for military veterans.

But both men say their version is still superior to the one offered by Sen. Jim Webb, a Virginia Democrat, which is wrapped inside the massive war supplemental package being considered in the Senate, reports Barb Barrett.

The pair, along with Sen. John McCain of Arizona, increased the annual payment for books to $1,000, allowed Guard and Reservists to more easily qualify for benefits and eliminated the $1,200 join-up fee for military members to participate in the program.

All match details of the Webb bill.

But in a news conference today, Burr and Graham said their bill will better help retention in the military. It allows military members to transfer half their college benefits to a spouse or child after six years, and 100 percent of the benefits after 12 years.

“I am not going to sit on the sidelines and under feel-good politics create a program that will hurt America’s ability to retain its force,” Graham said. “Now is not the time to put a benefit on the table that incentivizes people to leave the military.”

Read more after the jump.

–––––

Retention was a key issue for Secretary of Defense Robert Gates when he cited his opposition to Webb’s bill earlier this year. Gates worried that members of the military would get out in order to take advantage of the generous benefits.

Webb’s bill, co-sponsored by a bi-partisan majority of both the House and Senate, would allow veterans with three years of service to go to the most expensive in-state public college from their home state. They also would receive a housing stipend.

It has been wrapped into the war supplemental package that could be voted on today in the Senate, but President Bush has threatened to veto the package.

Bush said Tuesday he supports the McCain/Burr/Graham alternative.

Burr and Graham plan to bring their bill back up after the Memorial Day recess. The pair said they made the changes after listening to veterans’ groups.

Their bill increases monthly payments from about $1,100 a month to $1,500 a month. Burr said that is more equitable and easier to manage than a state-by-state system proposed by Webb.

“We’re trying to apply a benefit that has as minimal unintended consequences as possible,” Burr said.

Webb on Tuesdsay offered a free-standing amendment including transferability in his bill, but only as a two-year pilot program for certain military members re-enlisting in the service.

You must be logged in to post a comment on this blog. If you already have an N&O online user account, click here to log in. Otherwise, click here to register (it's free!).

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Re: Another Vet Voice...

"I feel bad for the enlisted folks who have gotten out, who don't live near their parents, who don't have savings, how are we setting them up for success???"

Ding! Ding! Ding!!

What's worse is that some schools don't defer tuition payment for the receipt of GI Bill cash. Veterans have to pay in advance for books, supplies, and tuition. That's easily a $500 bill for one single class, much less a full-load.

The current GI Bill plan has failed the American veteran. Any plan short of full tuition and books fails the American veteran.

Another Vet Voice...

As an Iraq vet, I think any Senator who does not support the Webb-Hagel bill is turning their backs on Iraq/Afghanistan vets, telling us that we are "not worthy" of the benefits of the WWII generation.

Unlike most others who speak about this, I'm an actual GI Bill recipient, currently receiving benefits. Luckily I'm going to school near home, so I live with my parents, and as a former officer, I had a decent amount of savings to feed off of for living/tuition/books/gas expenses. Don't get me wrong, my GI Bill monthly check helps, but it is truly a drop in the bucket. The "Greatest Generation" had 100% of their education paid for. But I have 8% percent of mine paid for, so I guess my service is only 8 percent "as great." I feel bad for the enlisted folks who have gotten out, who don't live near their parents, who don't have savings, how are we setting them up for success??? It isn't just for college...it's for community college and technical schools.

This is the message that the American people and the U.S. Senate wish to send us vets and currently serving military? Instead of spending $1.35 on a stupid yellow ribbon sticker that's most likely made from another country, how about we spend money on our vets and support them when the LEAVE they combat zone??


Re: Burr keeps pushing his GI bill

I don't have a problem with either bill per se, but I wish Burr's bill would get a fair shake on here. There are a few aspects of the Burr bill that would make the Webb bill stronger and it doesn't appear that they will get a hearing or be voted on if offered as amendments.

It's also nice to have actual debate on the issue. I have great respect for all the veterans, especially the ones I've had the opportunity to meet in school since I've been in college.

MattM, have you served in the military?

n/t

Re: Burr keeps pushing his GI bill

Thomas, that myth has been disproved time and again by people who actually do the research. The people at the lowest levels you speak of make up a slim minority of active military members, the majority come from the middle-class. Oops, bet you didn't know that, as your liberal victimhood blinders refuse to let you see truth, only hollow platitudes and sweeping generalizations.

Thank you, Senator Burr!

Senator Burr,

Thank you for doing what you can to keep the uneducated military uneducated.

How dare any the lowly folks that enlist believe that American dreams of education, good paying jobs, and financial security should be available to them? After all, aren't they fighting and dying for your right to the American dream?

Everyone knows that the majority of military enlistees are from the lower socio-economic levels of American society. They should stay there, because that's where they belong.

Right, Senator Burr? Right?