A bill would allow insurers to not pay for contraceptive services and abortions for religious reasons.
Rep. Mark Hilton, a Catawba County Republican, said he filed the bill after hearing from churches and other religious groups that provide insurance.
The state currently allows insurers to not include RU-486 and other so-called morning-after pills that provide emergency contraception.
The bill would extend that to "any drug or device that interferes with the development o an embryo after fertilization," which would include birth-control pills and other methods such as hormone injections.
It also includes a "conscience clause" that would allow businesses and insurance providers to avoid paying for contraception if it was against their "religious beliefs or moral convictions."
"They should have the discretion to decide what's covered," he said.
He said he did not have much hope that his bill would pass, though he thinks there's an outside chance it may get a hearing.
Blog RSS feed
Re: Bill would extend conscience clause
Religious exemption or "conscience clause is an awful idea and dangerous. What happens if a Scientologist becomes a pharmacist, many of them don't believe in psychiatric medications. How about someone who feels that premarital sex is a sin and refuses to fill prescriptions for not only birth control but medications for STD's or HIV? Also if you define something as interfering with implantation then IUD's are also out of the question.
Bad Idea!