Under the Dome

Audit finds lack of verification in JDIG grants

The state Department of Commerce issued $20 million in job-creation grants in 2010 without performing audits or onsite visits to confirm that the companies met the requirements of the grants, according to a state audit released Monday.

The department instead relied on withholding records from the Department of Revenue to confirm the accuracy of the wage and tax information being reported by companies, while also requiring companies to submit and certify annual reports.

“Relying on a company that is receiving grant payments to confirm that the company is in compliance with the grant requirements does not meet the definition of an objective and independent process,” the auditor’s report concluded.

The audit identified several other problems with the way Commerce officials administer the state’s Job Development Investment Grant program, which returns to companies a portion of withholding taxes paid by new employees. Companies that receive JDIGs are required to meet annual investment and job-creation milestones to receive payments.

The audit found that Commerce staff did not provide information about some potential JDIG grants to the Economic Investment Committee, a 5-member body that oversees the program. The department also lacks a measureable criteria for determining the size of the JDIGs awarded for different projects.

In a written response to the audit, Commerce Secretary Sharon Decker said the department will come up with possible solutions to improve the verification process for grant compliance. It also plans to come up with a better formula for determining the size of JDIGs that is expected to be presented to the Economic Investment Committee before Aug. 15.

The new model will also provide the committee with quarterly reports that include the list of projects that were not presented for consideration, as well as the rationale for why they were not being considered for a JDIG

While Commerce agreed with some of the auditors findings and recommendations, it disagreed on other points.

Commerce staff noted in the audit report that they believe onsite audits were never contemplated as part of the JDIG, nor was there funds allocated for such efforts. They also believe sufficient protections exist within the program to obtain accurate reporting from the companies.

Staff also noted that there are a variety of reasons that a potential JDIG project are never presented to the committee for consideration. A company may decide to locate in another state, cancel a planned move or expansion, or fail to meet the requirement that they be considering another state or country besides North Carolina.

As for the size of JDIGs, Commerce staff said the amount is determined by what is needed to win the project as well as previous grant amounts for comparable projects.

The $20 million in payments identified in the audit were issued for 35 different grants. Since its inception in 2003, the state has awarded 145 JDIGs totaling $600 million.


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

“Relying on a company that is receiving grant payments..."

Of course you can rely on the company that received the grant. After all this is a transaction among "good ol' boys." They would never mislead each other. You must not understand the code of the good ol' brotherhood of government grants. You give your buddy a grant and he tells you what you want to hear. It is a perfect system.

This is entirely the fault of the auditor. And looking closely at the figures can cause headaches and strain your eyes.

Lighten up!

Cars View All
Find a Car
Jobs View All
Find a Job
Homes View All
Find a Home

Want to post a comment?

In order to join the conversation, you must be a member of Click here to register or to log in.