Judges hear video poker arguments


The lawyer for a Fayetteville amusement machine vendor said in court Wednesday that North Carolina lacks a consistent public policy toward gambling when it allows Cherokee Indians to run video poker machines while banning such gaming everywhere else.

Lawyers for the state and the vendor traded arguments before the state Court of Appeals over the legality of a 2006 state law that made machines illegal except on the Cherokee reservation, west of Asheville. A trial court judge in Wake County overturned the law in February.

The three-member appeals panel grilled vendor attorney Hugh Stevens, asking pointed questions about a federal American Indian gambling law that provides the basis for the state's agreement with the Cherokees that allows the tribe to operate a casino. At several points in the hearing, the judges appeared openly skeptical of Stevens’ position that the state law should be struck down.

—————

Special Deputy Attorney General Mark Davis, representing Gov. Beverly Perdue, said the ban is legal and consistent with the federal gambling act and that state legislators had acted well within their discretion to set public policy for the state.

With the court’s usual quarters across from the Old State Capitol under renovations, the hearing was held in a small conference room in a Fayetteville Street office tower. More than 20 county sheriffs from across the state packed the temporary courtroom to show their opposition to overturning the state’s ban on poker machines, while members of the media were relegated to watching the court proceedings on television monitors in a nearby kitchen.

It could be weeks or months before the judges rule in the case, which could have far-ranging implications on the legality of gambling in the state.

You must be logged in to post a comment on this blog. If you already have an N&O online user account, click here to log in. Otherwise, click here to register (it's free!).

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Re: Judges hear video poker arguments

Sheriffs? For serious? There have been a bunch of sheriffs in NC that have been convicted of doing business with these machine owners, one in Asheville comes to mind and here in New Hanover County for years the sheriff has looked the other way. Not saying he was taking money but an ex-boyfriend of mine used to work at a place here and he told me a thing or two about how they were able to do what they did. After all the Southland Amusements company that worked to get Jim Black money is out of Wilmington. These places rake in the money, I know for a fact that one man lost $20,000 in less than 24 hours at one place. That's cash money!