Claims Dept: Pittenger on pigging out

bkrueger — Thu, 30 Oct 2008 11:29:07 -0400

Former N.C. Sen. Robert Pittenger, Republican candidate for lieutenant governor, is running a TV ad against his Democratic challenger, state Sen. Walter Dalton.

What the ad says: Announcer: "Raleigh's pigging out. Take Senator Walton Dalton. Dalton gave Goodyear tax breaks...after they hired his brother-in-law. Dalton made state insurance pay for erectile dysfunction drugs...while Dalton's daughter was the drug company's lobbyist. Dalton gave Dell special tax breaks...while he owned Dell stock. Wasteful Walter Dalton. He made government work...For Walter Dalton."

"I'm Robert Pittenger, running for Lieutenant Governor, and I sponsored this message."

The ad features cartoon images of pigs prancing around with bags of money.

The background:

- In September 2007, the legislature passed an economic incentives bill that would give Goodyear more than $24 million over 10 years. On a strictly party-line vote, Dalton voted in favor; Pittenger against.

Goodyear hired Dalton's brother-in-law - former Republican legislator and gubernatorial candidate Chuck Neely - on Aug. 31, a day after Gov. Mike Easley vetoed an early version of the incentives bill. Dalton publicly supported that version. But when it passed the Senate overwhelmingly, he was absent.

- Under one version of the 2004 budget, drugs such as Cialis -- after a four-year absence - reappeared on a list of those eligible for coverage under the state health plan. Dalton, a chief budget writer, said at the time that the suggestion came out of a subcommittee. The measure passed the Senate but never became law.

Dalton's daughter, Elizabeth Dalton, was a lobbyist for Eli Lilly, which manufactured Cialis. Aides say Dalton also has voted against his daughter's clients, such as the N.C. Retail Merchants. And they say he voted for a similar drug provision in an earlier budget, when his daughter was still in college.

- In 2004, Dalton was among a majority of lawmakers who voted for $242 million worth of incentives to computer-maker Dell. Dalton had bought $10,000 worth of Dell shares in 1999. While the stock value rose after the incentives deal, he later sold it at a loss.

Dalton spokeswoman Kimberly Reynolds said the stocks were in a managed account and "daily decisions are made by his financial advisor without input from Sen. Dalton." She said Dalton has long supported measures he believes will create jobs.

Is the ad accurate? The votes are accurate. But the implication that Dalton voted because of family ties or personal benefit is subjective.

- Jim Morrill, The Charlotte Observer

Hagan seeks women, labor vote

bkrueger — Mon, 27 Oct 2008 14:21:29 -0400

CHARLOTTE - Democratic U.S. Senate candidate Kay Hagan sought to woo women and labor votes today at appearances with an Alabama woman who sparked a Supreme Court case over equal pay.

Lilly Ledbetter was a longtime employee of the Goodyear Tire plant in Gadsden, Al., who discovered after years that her male counterparts were paid more for the same job. She filed a discrimination suit and won in lower courts. But in 2007, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that whatever the merits of her case, she'd waited too long to sue.

Ledbetter and Hagan ripped Republican Sen. Elizabeth Dole who, in April, voted against a bill known as the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2007, reports Jim Morrill of The Charlotte Observer. It would have allowed suits such as Ledbetter's to stand.

"I don't understand how Liddy Dole could have voted against it,"Ledbetter said. "But she did."

The two spoke to a small audience at Queens University that included a dozen Teamsters from Local 71.

Dole spokesman Dan McLagan noted that Hagan, a state senator, last year voted to give Goodyear incentives to persuade it to keep its North Carolina plant open.

"Is it me, or is it a bit hypocritical of Hagan to be campaigning with a woman who is suing the same company that Hagan voted to give a taxpayer handout to?" McLagan said. "Also, is it hypocritical for Hagan to be giving tax breaks to a company that has had previous issues with pay discrimination?"