Other negative N.C. nicknames

The Paradox of Tar Heel PoliticsNegative nicknames aren't new in North Carolina.

During the 1960 Democratic primary for governor, Terry Sanford was tarred with three nicknames by his political opponents: Terrible Tax Terry, High Tax Terry and Tall Talking Terry, according to Rob Christensen's recent book "The Paradox of Tar Heel Politics."

He won the primary and the governorship anyway.

But when he was running for re-election to the U.S. Senate in 1992, Sanford was given yet another nickname for the fact that he voted three different ways on a federal highway bill in 1987: Turnaround Terry.

He lost that election to Republican Lauch Faircloth.

Rob in Winston-Salem tonight

Rob ChristensenThe News and Observer's political columnist will be at the Barnes and Noble in Winston-Salem tonight at 7 p.m. discussing his new book, "The Paradox of Tar Heel Politics."

He will also be at the Barnes and Noble in Fayetteville on Saturday at 3 p.m

Rob in Charlotte Saturday

Rob ChristensenYou can catch Rob in Charlotte this weekend.

The longtime N&O political reporter and columnist Rob Christensen will be speaking Saturday at Park Road Books in the Queen City at 2 p.m.

He'll be reading from his book, "The Paradox of Tar Heel Politics," and answering questions.

Christensen in Asheville Saturday

The Paradox of Tar Heel PoliticsYou have another chance to ask Rob a question.

N&O reporter and columnist Rob Christensen will at Malaprop's Bookstore & Cafe in Asheville at 7 p.m. Saturday talking about his new history of 20th century state politics, "The Paradox of Tar Heel Politics."

Among other topics, Christensen will be talking about Asheville's own, U.S. Sen. Robert Reynolds, the five-time married playboy who became such a Nazi sympathizer that he became known as The Tar Heel Fuhrer.

For a previous Q&A with Christensen, see here.

Rob's answers to reader questions

The Paradox of Tar Heel PoliticsRob Christensen recently took Dome reader questions on his new book, "The Paradox of Tar Heel Politics."

Here are his answers to a few of those questions: 

Is the book you wrote the book you set out to write? If different, how so?

This is pretty much the book I set out to write. I wanted to write the book that I wanted to read: a book that connected the dots, that provided some context, and that involved some story-telling.

In reviewing the period covered, did you have any eureka moments? What were they?

A long the way, there were a number of surprises. Who knew that we almost had a governor lynched or that the first woman candidate for governor was a KGB agent, or that a North Carolina senator was a Nazi sympathizer? But what was most interesting to me is how the same issues play out time and time again. As Harry Truman once remarked, the only thing new in the world is the history you don't know.

Who was the most fascinating unheralded political figure you encountered or learned about?

Gov. O. Gardner, who was elected in 1928. He was a textile plant owner and a lawyer who pretty much invented state government as it exists today. After leaving office, he moved to Washington to become one of the first of the super lobbyists. But for 20 years he continued to run the state from his suite in the Mayflower Hotel.

Is there anyone who in your estimate should have but didn't achieve political success warranted by his or her ability? Who was the most memorable overachiever?

The memorable overachiever was two-term Sen. Robert Reynolds (1932-1944) who won election saying that the sitting senator, Cameron Morrison, a Charlotte plutocrat, ate fish eggs and red Russian fish eggs at that, and wasn't it time to elect a senator who didn't mind eating regular old North Carolina hen eggs.

What would be the subject of a book about N.C. politics that you have no intention of writing?

A boring history of the administration of each governor.

Syndicate content