The N.C. Department of Justice says it will be an ally to northeastern North Carolina in its fight against the U.S. Navy's proposed Outlying Landing Field.

A letter from the Attorney General's office to U.S. Rep. Walter Jones, a Farmville Republican, indicates the department would enforce laws by which the state would retain some jurisdiction over lands seized for an OLF in counties that do not already have military bases. That would allow the counties to enforce noise ordinances, for example, on the Navy.

"Without full jurisdiction over property acquired for an OLF, it appears that the Navy would have difficulty in operating a military base," wrote Chief Deputy Attorney General Grayson Kelley. "The Attorney General's office will therefore continue to carefully monitor all legal issues related to the OLF siting process and be prepared to act as necessary to protect the economy and environment of eastern North Carolina."

The Navy is considering sites in Camden and Gates counties for a nighttime practice landing field for its pilots from Oceana Naval Air Station in Virginia Beach. Camden and Gates residents have opposed the Navy's proposals.

A legal battle involving the State Ethics Commission and the Office of State Auditor could end up costing taxpayers $40,000.

The N.C. Attorney General's Office has determined that it has a conflict in representing either party in a lawsuit the commission filed earlier this month, reports Dan Kane.

So both sides are hiring private lawyers to handle the matter. Gov. Mike Easley authorized an initial cap of $20,000 for each party.

Noelle Talley, a spokeswoman for the attorney general, said chief deputy Grayson Kelley had unsuccessfully sought to mediate the dispute.

The battle is over whether the commission has to comply with the auditor's investigation into an allegation of preferential treatment for Lt. Gov. Beverly Perdue, the Democratic nominee for governor. A Perdue aide visited the commission's office to review Perdue's financial disclosure statements and was allowed to look at them alone in a vacant office.

Since then, a log noting the arrangement was altered and the employee who made the notation has been fired. Ethics commission officials say nothing was improper in the visit and the employee was not fired as a result of the notation.