<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://projects.newsobserver.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>newsobserver.com projects - Steve Metcalf - Comments</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/tags/steve_metcalf</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Steve Metcalf&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Re: 2007: Banner year for state lobbying</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/2007_banner_year_for_state_lobbying#comment-17635</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#39;s based on the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.secretary.state.nc.us/lobbyists/&quot;&gt;official reports&lt;/a&gt; filed by lobbyists with the Secretary of State. As I&amp;#39;ve noted in the past, those reports don&amp;#39;t include payments made for non-lobbying — the so-called &lt;a href=&quot;/blogs/arnold_close_consulting_loophole&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;consulting loophole.&amp;quot;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That said, the Democracy N.C. report is a fair reflection of what the lobbyists themselves reported. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;— RTB &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:19:46 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ryanteaguebeckwith</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 17635 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: 2007: Banner year for state lobbying</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/2007_banner_year_for_state_lobbying#comment-17634</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I haven&#039;t seen anything regarding the methodology of this study and an analysis of the validity of the methodology.  Can anyone help?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:14:25 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>PoliticalJunkie</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 17634 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
