<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://projects.newsobserver.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>newsobserver.com projects - Bill O&amp;#039;Reilly - Comments</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/tags/bill_oreilly</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Bill O&#039;Reilly&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Re: Claims Dept: Dole&#039;s &#039;Promises&#039; ad</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/claims_dept_doles_promises_ad#comment-12636</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;yeah, this is definitely pants on fire territory. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:47:51 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Atnor</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 12636 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Claims Dept: Dole&#039;s &#039;Promises&#039; ad</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/claims_dept_doles_promises_ad#comment-12611</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;With diplomacy skills like that, RTB and Barbara Barrett should really consider a change of careers. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It doesn&#039;t make you less of a journalist to call lies, lies. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 10:03:48 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>natdug</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 12611 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Claims Dept: Dole&#039;s &#039;Promises&#039; ad</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/claims_dept_doles_promises_ad#comment-12608</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Oh c&#039;mon, if this isn&#039;t a &quot;pants on fire&quot; ad, I don&#039;t know what is!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 09:38:04 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Isaac136</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 12608 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Letterman for Edwards?</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/letterman_for_edwards#comment-3477</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I dunno, always liked his show better than Leno&amp;#39;s...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Wait, we&amp;#39;re talking about Letterman, right?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;— RTB &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 13:30:34 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ryanteaguebeckwith</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3477 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Letterman for Edwards?</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/letterman_for_edwards#comment-3474</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;What is your fascination with this guy?  Are you just partial to clowns?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 10:08:56 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>cornax</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3474 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Edwards v. O&#039;Reilly on homeless vets</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/edwards_v_oreilly_on_homeless_vets#comment-3389</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The post has been corrected.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;— RTB &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:00:45 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ryanteaguebeckwith</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3389 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Edwards v. O&#039;Reilly on homeless vets</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/edwards_v_oreilly_on_homeless_vets#comment-3385</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;You question the current Administration&#039;s concern for Vets...&lt;br /&gt;
Wasn&#039;t Bill &amp;amp; Hillary President in 1996??????&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:44:37 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>mickiep</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3385 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Edwards v. O&#039;Reilly on homeless vets</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/edwards_v_oreilly_on_homeless_vets#comment-3353</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the clarification...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For the record, O&#039;Reilly&#039;s still an idiot...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:25:20 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>KPeddi</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3353 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Edwards v. O&#039;Reilly on homeless vets</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/edwards_v_oreilly_on_homeless_vets#comment-3349</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Actually, Rob wrote the item and he was just noting what the alliance said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;From my reporting on the Wake County beat, many of the men at the Raleigh shelter are veterans.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;— RTB &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:36:51 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ryanteaguebeckwith</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3349 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Edwards v. O&#039;Reilly on homeless vets</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/edwards_v_oreilly_on_homeless_vets#comment-3348</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;If this number is from 1996, chances are the number of homeless veterans is astronomically higher... with record foreclosure rates, PSTS syndrome tripling since 2001, the current economic downturn, then the 200,000 number could be just the tip of the iceberg...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think we&#039;ve seen just how much this Administration cares about our Vets...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ryan, just wondering. Are you trying to marginalize the Edwards claim by stating the numbers supposedly come from 1996? Or am I just reading too much into this?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:19:05 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>KPeddi</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3348 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: The Orange County factor</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/blogs/the_orange_county_factor#comment-520</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;What?  O&#039;Reilly said he interviewed residents of a trailer park, none of whom actually live in a trailer park.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Just because there is one down the street doesnt mean he is correct.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 21:45:06 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>lefaim</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 520 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: The Orange County factor</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/blogs/the_orange_county_factor#comment-519</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;So you say O&#039;Reilly is wrong, that there isn&#039;t a trailer park across the street. Then you say there are &quot;manufactured homes&quot; down the street. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Me thinks thou dost protest too much. If your house wasn&#039;t built on your property, you live in a trailer park. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 20:39:59 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>loadofcrap</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 519 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: The Orange County factor</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/blogs/the_orange_county_factor#comment-508</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Bill O a liar and an idiot?  Why that has never happened before!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Im shocked Bill talked to the guy, though.  Is Bill a fan of Rudy?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 10:28:22 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>lefaim</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 508 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
