<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://projects.newsobserver.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>newsobserver.com projects - Darren Jackson - Comments</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/tags/darren_jackson</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Darren Jackson&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Re: Bill would limit judge-shopping in pleas</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/bill_would_limit_judge_shopping_in_pleas#comment-19452</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;...but with the leftwing liberal judges and loiwyers operating hand n hand in all NC counties, wouldnt it be PRUDENT that each party knows?  there is a gross amount of protectionism in NC.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 08:00:50 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>BitterEXdemocrat</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 19452 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Bill would limit legislators&#039; stipends</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/bill_would_limit_legislators_pay#comment-15521</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;This is just the Senate&#039;s way of creating time limits for legislative sessions. Trust me, this will never see the light of day in the House. The Senate only has 50 members, so they don&#039;t mind having time limits...but when you have 120 members of the House, they like to be a bit more deliberative and ensure that all the people&#039;s representatives have a voice, so I doubt they&#039;ll take kindly to this.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 08:50:07 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>captsfufp</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 15521 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Bill would limit legislators&#039; stipends</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/bill_would_limit_legislators_pay#comment-15488</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Fixed. Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;— RTB &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 16:02:45 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ryanteaguebeckwith</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 15488 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Bill would limit legislators&#039; stipends</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/bill_would_limit_legislators_pay#comment-15487</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Ryan,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s ROGER West, not Thomas.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 15:41:07 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>cthayes75</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 15487 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Bill would limit legislators&#039; stipends</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/bill_would_limit_legislators_pay#comment-15485</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Post slightly reworded to avoid calling per diems &amp;quot;pay&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;salary,&amp;quot; which they are not.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;— RTB &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 14:58:08 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ryanteaguebeckwith</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 15485 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Bill would limit legislators&#039; stipends</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/bill_would_limit_legislators_pay#comment-15481</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;This is a great plan! I worked for the General Assembly in Iowa and there was no constitutional provision for length of session. Lawmakers could stay in town as long as they liked, but they would be paid during the long session for 110 days and during the short session for 100 days. It was amazing to see how things wrapped up when the money was running out. Kudos to Sen. Rand!!!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 13:34:33 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>beagletwinsmama</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 15481 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Perdue appoints legislator</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/perdue_appoints_legislator#comment-15275</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Hot Diggidy Hussein--just what we need in Raleigh--another lawyer. Some more change we can believe in--Right! Bev is definitely a koo aid drinker.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 20:53:30 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>alaskan1</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 15275 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Dems consider Coleman&#039;s replacement</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/dems_consider_colemans_replacement#comment-14893</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Donald Mial and James Roberson are state employees so the employment factor presents itself. Jackson, Bonds and Brown do not have that issue. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 20:35:50 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>brg78days</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 14893 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Dems consider Coleman&#039;s replacement</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/dems_consider_colemans_replacement#comment-14894</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;When I assess the demographics of the district, I think the obvious choices are Lindy Brown or Jeanne Bonds. There is a majority women. James Roberson was just elected to a town council and has not track record. Bonds and Brown have been elected and have track records to look to. Bonds&#039; resume shows a lot of statewide involvement and Brown has county wide involvement. I heard Republicans say they would support Bonds. I think these two women could raise the money. Sorry guys, but there will be a battle for this seat and you have to go with the women and the money. I hope the committee is going to let these folks speak and add some objectivity to it.  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 20:34:10 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>brg78days</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 14894 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Dems consider Coleman&#039;s replacement</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/dems_consider_colemans_replacement#comment-14849</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Mayor Jeanne Milliken Bonds won her elections as the top vote getter each time. She is a proven record of success and she gets things done. We have good, planned development because of her leadership in Knightdale. In the words of the current Mayor Pro Tem &quot;she put Knightdale on the map.&quot; Literally. She got maps out there showing our little town when we were 1500 with big plans. Parks, roads, she did it all and has a record. I think she helped Donald and Darren and they are great guys. But she can win and they may not be able to against a tough Republican. She is a proven fundraiser. Several high ranking democrats have been working to convince her to do it along with those of us who supported her previously. She has been asked to do it before and we are working to convince her to go for it. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:56:44 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>DonnaM52</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 14849 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Dems consider Coleman&#039;s replacement</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/dems_consider_colemans_replacement#comment-14822</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Who among us isn&#039;t looking for the &quot;next step up?&quot; It&#039;s our job to prepare for opportunity and be ready to say &quot;yes&quot; when opportunity knocks.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:42:12 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>lorrinda</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 14822 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Dems consider Coleman&#039;s replacement</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/dems_consider_colemans_replacement#comment-14792</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;How about her Republican opponent Duane Cutlip? He actually ran against her with the desire to represent the people of State House 39. If Linda Coleman had any inkling about serving our next Governor, why did she run? Was Linda just looking for that next step up? &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:43:13 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>tangoz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 14792 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
