newsobserver.com projects - SBI - Comments

Re: Lobbyist cleared, Blue Cross says

ishley — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 11:17:09 -0400

Actually Glazier turned it over to the Wake DA and commended the Republican legislator for bringing the matter before the Ethics Commission. There are plenty of cover-ups going on at the NCGA, but this probably isn't one of them.

@BitterEXdemocrat: you really do sound insane. Also, your posts almost never contribute anything of substance. You're vying with Paul Terrell for worst poster on here.

Re: Lobbyist cleared, Blue Cross says

Kingixolib — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 06:15:51 -0400

And the SBI referenced in this article is the same one that works for Roy Cooper?

And a Democratic co-chair on the ethics committee signed off on it?

Nothing to see here, please move along.

Re: Lobbyist cleared, Blue Cross says

BitterEXdemocrat — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 03:06:49 -0400

*spelled with 3 Ks to characterize and honor the ORIGINAL 'party' of SLAVERY, as they continue to ENSLAVE us all...

STRIVE to be SMARTER than a VILE CORRUPT NC democrackkk!

Re: Lobbyist cleared, Blue Cross says

pinestate78 — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:19:43 -0400

"democrackkks." you know you sound insane, right?

Re: Lobbyist cleared, Blue Cross says

BitterEXdemocrat — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:01:03 -0400

This smells from the sidelines...probably an inside coverup here...democrackkks at work...

Better late than never?

CitizenOpinionated — Wed, 24 Jun 2009 11:55:40 -0400

"Attorney General Cooper earlier this year directed the State Bureau of Investigation to investigate matters related to the former Governor and other issues," wrote Kristi Hyman

"Earlier this year" - as in a few days ago after it was clear that Easley was going down and Cooper did not want to join the ranks of Bev Perdue in the eyes of the public perception...

Re: SBI investigating Easley, too

cdtew — Wed, 24 Jun 2009 10:59:13 -0400

Here goes Cooper, charging in on his white stallion, only after the FBI has done all the footwork and basically trapped him into getting involved.

No, he certainly never could have discovered any wrongdoing say, oh, 3 years ago.

Re: Christian won't face charges for portrait

ryanteaguebeckwith — Thu, 04 Sep 2008 08:47:41 -0400

Comment deleted for profanity.

— RTB

Re: Christian won't face charges for portrait

FFC1304 — Wed, 27 Aug 2008 06:21:55 -0400

Dempsey Benton should be fired before sunset.

Re: Christian won't face charges for portrait

workerbee4 — Wed, 27 Aug 2008 02:11:23 -0400

What kind of world do we live in that makes it o.k. to steal from mentally ill patients?? Many of them have so little to start with, many look forward to obtaining clothes from the clothing room. I bet they'd think they had won the lottery if they had $572.oo. Some families don't even visit because they don't have the gas, even before prices went up. Patients are often readmitted because they can't afford their meds......But she's sent to CH to help "fix" things?? Where are the patient advocates when you REALLY need one????

Re: Christian won't face charges for portrait

workerbee4 — Wed, 27 Aug 2008 02:06:09 -0400

But Ms. Sudderth is Reassigned?????????????? Maybe CH does need to close.

Re: Christian won't face charges for portrait

workerbee4 — Wed, 27 Aug 2008 02:03:25 -0400

Let's see now. Jackie S. hasn't been charged with obstruction of justice. Dr. Berg hasn't been charged with assault. It's o.k. that the former DIRECTOR of the hospital took money intended to benefit patients. I've had staff be investigated for an alleged missing nutty bar. What's wrong with this picture????

Re: Christian won't face charges for portrait

Atnor — Tue, 26 Aug 2008 18:25:57 -0400

Considering the weak "discipline" the state has bandied about at Cherry and these hospitals in general, I'm not really surprised at all.

Re: Christian won't face charges for portrait

ccc5437 — Tue, 26 Aug 2008 17:40:34 -0400

No lets just allow her to continue working for the state at 95 % of her salary. As a private provider should something like this happens in and agency I would fire the person. Because it is embezzling , stealing etc. etc. etc.

Re: Christian won't face charges for portrait

is_anyone_listening — Tue, 26 Aug 2008 17:11:21 -0400

Any one to use patient money for their own "blown out of proportion" ego should be charged with stealing or exploitation, not transferred. That money is for "forgotten" patients...for patients that have nothing and there are many of them. And it's all that Cherry hospital needs...someone who doesn't give a hoot about patients to give advice on how to get out of the trouble they're in.