<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://projects.newsobserver.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>newsobserver.com projects - Elaine Marshall - Comments</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/tags/elaine_marshall</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Elaine Marshall&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Re: Money request rankles lobbyists</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/money_request_rankles_lobbyists#comment-27729</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Minnie - You&#039;ve chosen to ignore a fairly key component of the discussion.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The only thing the lobbyists in question apparently signed up for was their registration with Marshall&#039;s OFFICE.  She REGULATES them.  She determines whether or not they can do whatever it is they do.  And now she&#039;s using that list, an official state resource, to send emails asking for money.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Oh well.  Its not like she flew around the state with Governor Easley on campaign trips or anything, right?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:52:56 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>SaintPinehurst</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 27729 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Money request rankles lobbyists</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/money_request_rankles_lobbyists#comment-27725</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Lobbyists receive invitations to fundraisers from legislators all the time. Why doesn&#039;t this &quot;rankle&quot; them?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 13:45:59 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>minnie</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 27725 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Money request rankles lobbyists</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/money_request_rankles_lobbyists#comment-27718</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Career politicians breed corruption and lies. Vote them out or they and their cronies either die in or retire from public office.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Option one....you win&lt;br /&gt;
Option two....you lose&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 06:05:15 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Kingixolib</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 27718 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Marshall = Sleeze</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/money_request_rankles_lobbyists#comment-27717</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Elaine Marshall, just another good old gal.  She likes to think she&#039;s above all the dirt and sleeze, but here she is, being caught again, right back in the mud.  We can do without another Democrat victory in 2010.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:19:24 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>kttechwriter</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 27717 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Money request rankles lobbyists</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/money_request_rankles_lobbyists#comment-27716</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Mr. Mills says: &quot;they had some sort of relationship with Secretary Marshall in the past.&quot; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mr. Mills means: &quot;they provided their email address to Secretary Marshall when they registered with the Secretary of State&#039;s Office.&quot; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;How many other times has Secretary Marshall emailed those people?  Is this really the first time its happened?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;We&#039;d be glad to remove their names&quot; doesn&#039;t address how they got on the list in the first place.  We&#039;re talking about official state resources... her office regulates lobbyists... and the implication is pay-to-play...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:17:11 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>SaintPinehurst</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 27716 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Money request rankles lobbyists</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/money_request_rankles_lobbyists#comment-27709</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;How old did she turn?   Time for new photos?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:50:55 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>BitterEXdemocrat</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 27709 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Money request rankles lobbyists</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/money_request_rankles_lobbyists#comment-27708</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Nothing like Busch league campaigning to inspire the DSCC to come here and spend the $10MM it will take to beat Burr. Here’s hoping that the campaign can get it together before the end of the 4th Quarter.  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:27:45 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>whatsnext</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 27708 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Marshall pollster: Yes she can!</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/malshall_pollster_yes_she_can#comment-27696</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;No, she can&#039;t.  Although Marshall is well-accepted in her current office, she trails Burr in the polls.  Since Marshall is such a well-known public official, it is unlikely that she can improve on her numbers even with a vigorous campaign.  On the other hand, Cal Cunningham is scarcely known in the state, and he can skyrocket in the polls after he launches a vigorous campaign.  The DSCC better start courting Cunningham very seriously if they want to defeat Burr next November.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 08:11:22 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>MalleusMaleficarum</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 27696 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Dome memo: Ethics and fence-sitting</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/dome_memo_ethics_and_fence_sitting#comment-27534</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;Hard work, perseverance and positive attitude will be rewarded. And if that doesn&#039;t work, a nice crisp $20 couldn&#039;t hurt.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At least the twenty bucks is reasonable.  Seems like state govenment payoffs cost a little more than that.  I don&#039;t mind the payoffs but couldn&#039;t we regulate them.  If the state would follow the suggestions of these kids then the price of payoffs would come down!  We are in a recession for heaven&#039;s sake!  Consult these children for an appropriate amount.  Show some mercy during these tough economic times.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;P.S.  You know of course that &quot;hard work, perseverance and positive attitude&quot; does not always work in politics and government.  Keep a roll of those crisp $20 handy just in case.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 11:16:38 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>captainjack</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 27534 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Poll: Burr&#039;s numbers up slightly</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/poll_burrs_numbers_up_slightly#comment-27529</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;giggles &quot;you do know that Senator Burr is our ONLY voice in the senate that voted FOR Bush&#039;s Wall Street Bailout.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And your point is?&lt;br /&gt;
And who are you calling a &quot;yankee&quot;?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 09:08:23 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Dogbyte</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 27529 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Poll: Burr&#039;s numbers up slightly</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/poll_burrs_numbers_up_slightly#comment-27527</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;there&#039;s not a qualified democrackkk in NC to run...thank God.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 06:32:20 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>BitterEXdemocrat</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 27527 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Poll: Burr&#039;s numbers up slightly</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/poll_burrs_numbers_up_slightly#comment-27524</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Dogbyte, you do know that Senator Burr is our ONLY voice in the senate that voted FOR Bush&#039;s Wall Street Bailout.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Once you grow up and get adult jobs, you won&#039;t be so off hand about throwing all your tax money away to the lazy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Goldman Sachs wasn&#039;t lazy? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On behalf of the good people we grow in small towns, up yours Yankee.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 22:39:53 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>GiggleBox</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 27524 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Poll: Burr&#039;s numbers up slightly</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/poll_burrs_numbers_up_slightly#comment-27523</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Looks like a lot of you socialists are running scared. Oh sorry, I meant liberals...naw, I am not PC so I really did mean socialists. But, in reality you are just a bunch of kids that don&#039;t know any better. Once you grow up and get adult jobs, you won&#039;t be so off hand about throwing all your tax money away to the lazy. Go ahead and back folks that will vote for a bill that murders children (abortions for you dense ones), steals from the seniors&#039; Medicare, mandates subscribing to insurance with threats of jail time, medical services rationing, higher premiums, etc. Oh, and less we forget the death panel is back in this bill. Argue all you want kiddies, but I back up what I say with fact, when all you do is bash the workers and producers. Hang in there kids, and we will take care of you, as always.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 22:21:39 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Dogbyte</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 27523 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Poll: Burr&#039;s numbers up slightly</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/poll_burrs_numbers_up_slightly#comment-27519</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s a strange thing to me the Democrats are having such a hard time finding an opponent for Burr if he is so weak.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t see anyone of the horizon in the Democrat world that can oust him, unless he stumbles terribly. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Reality must be raising it&#039;s ugly head and if things continue, Hagan will have trouble in her future.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Just my opinion, but I believe I have a lot of company.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:10:56 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Quigley</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 27519 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Poll: Burr&#039;s numbers up slightly</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/poll_burrs_numbers_up_slightly#comment-27517</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
 marcus_sthal&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; i am in 1000 % agreement with your posting on here anyone in this state that is stupided enough to continue to vote for an support any republican member of the us congress after the bush adminstration an their cohorts have just finished f---in the american worker an the citizens of this state an nation they have got to be totaly crazy thank you &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:23:46 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>beachbum3</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 27517 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
