<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://projects.newsobserver.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>newsobserver.com projects - Charles Perusse - Comments</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/tags/charles_perusse</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Charles Perusse&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Re: Economy may rebound, but not budget</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/economy_may_rebound_but_not_budget#comment-17010</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The state doesn&#039;t fund college sports or pay coaches salaries, not the big dogs anyway.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:41:27 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Thinking</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 17010 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Economy, Revenue and Budget</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/economy_may_rebound_but_not_budget#comment-16989</link>
 <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;If the economy rebounds, then more tax revenue will be received, both because more people are back at work, and because businesses are making a profit.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You&amp;#39;re right, but you&amp;#39;re missing the point. The fiscal year begins in July, and he doesn&amp;#39;t anticipate the economy rebounding until early 2010. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Given a lag of several months between a better economy and increased tax revenue, there won&amp;#39;t be additional revenue by the end of the budget year.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;— RTB &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:05:51 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ryanteaguebeckwith</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 16989 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Economy may rebound, but not budget</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/economy_may_rebound_but_not_budget#comment-16986</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Save the state budget over 200 million every year.&lt;br /&gt;
Fire all the UNC System coaches.&lt;br /&gt;
College sports, the biggest taxypayer and student rip-off around.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 11:41:07 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>igliigli</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 16986 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Economy, Revenue and Budget</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/economy_may_rebound_but_not_budget#comment-16985</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Who are we trying to fool here? If the economy rebounds, then more tax revenue will be received, both because more people are back at work, and because businesses are making a profit. &quot;Projections&quot; are best guesses based on the incomplete information available and historical records - and in my experience does not fall within 20% of reality -good or bad. The budget, on the other hand need not be designed to spend all available revenue, and in fact should provide for savings for emergencies, down turns in the economy like this one, and projects that are so enormously expensive that an increase in cost due to the length of the project is guaranteed.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 11:35:05 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>night_hunter</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 16985 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
