<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://projects.newsobserver.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>newsobserver.com projects - Office of Management and Budget - Comments</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/tags/office_of_management_and_budget</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Office of Management and Budget&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Re: The biggest federal government ever?</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/the_biggest_federal_government_ever#comment-9990</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;101... that&amp;#39;s a number bigger than a hundred, right? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;— RTB &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 21:32:25 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ryanteaguebeckwith</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 9990 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: The biggest federal government ever?</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/the_biggest_federal_government_ever#comment-9989</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;If you need to consult the full Claims Department to make such a simple declaration of fact, you probably shouldn&#039;t be reporting on budget issues.  This is 101 stuff...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 21:08:33 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>dahedgehog</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 9989 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: The biggest federal government ever?</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/the_biggest_federal_government_ever#comment-9984</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Dome is reserving judgment until the full Claims Department fact check is complete. We&amp;#39;re still in the research phase. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At that point, we&amp;#39;ll state whether we think the claim is valid, and all of you will howl in protest that we should let the reader decide... &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;— RTB &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:51:49 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ryanteaguebeckwith</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 9984 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: The biggest federal government ever?</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/the_biggest_federal_government_ever#comment-9982</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;She said a better comparison is the percentage of the gross domestic product.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Why do you have to find someone to say it?  Why don&#039;t you just say it?  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m a dem, but this attack by Hagan is stupid.  The nominal level of government spending is irrelevant.  As a reporter, you should have the understanding (and balls) to simply say so. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Instead, your post is a &quot;he said/she said&quot; and your readers can decide whether they want to believe Hagan or the OMB spokeswoman.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:38:29 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>dahedgehog</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 9982 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: The biggest federal government ever?</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/the_biggest_federal_government_ever#comment-9979</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;27th largest budget per GDP in 78 years. That is in the lower half of all budgets since 1930. And actually less than 40% of all budgets since 1930. Hey Bat? What do you have to say now. Your distortion has been proven FALSE.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Democrats will do anything and apparently say anything.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:04:49 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>tangoz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 9979 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: The biggest federal government ever?</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/the_biggest_federal_government_ever#comment-9973</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;...and Kay Hagan has helped CREATE the BIGGEST most BLOATED, most CORRUPT NC state government in history too!!!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:07:59 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>FFC1304</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 9973 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
