<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://projects.newsobserver.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>newsobserver.com projects - Randy Glover - Comments</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/tags/randy_glover</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Randy Glover&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Affair to Remember?</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/u_s_attorney_will_look_for_new_charges#comment-27048</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Glover says in the article that &quot;everybody who was around me at the time knew about&quot; the affair. For years, there has also been talk about a relationship between Glover and another very high-ranking public official.  Given the revelations about Glover&#039;s past, the media should now ask those parties involved if these rumors should be put to bed or not.  How about some answers?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 10:32:03 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>concerned53</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 27048 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>No Ben, you&#039;re just dumb</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/at_their_age#comment-26432</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m sorry I called you disgusting.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I get it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We&#039;ve had law and order for 80 years and somebody screwed up so all State Troopers are not only octogenarians, but also rapists.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hi-lar-i-ous. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank you for your post.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 22:01:21 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>GiggleBox</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 26432 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Ben, you&#039;re digusting</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/at_their_age#comment-26430</link>
 <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Whoever thought you&#039;d have to tell an 80-year-old to behave?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Highway Patrol apparently has joined Hugh Hefner and Anna Nicole Smith&#039;s late-husband among octogenarians who were having too much fun. So it must have seemed to patrol leaders like a good time to reflect on past, um, accomplishments.uncil and Federal races. People actually care about that.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Did you read your own facts about this case or just want to make a case for moving to D.C. for Roll Call?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You&#039;re disgusting.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 21:38:27 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>GiggleBox</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 26430 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Captain&#039;s actions lead to new inquiry</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/captains_actions_lead_to_new_inquiry#comment-25084</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;How stupid does Reuben Young think we are? How stupid does he think the N&amp;amp;O&#039;s Dan Kane, who wrote the original story about the investigation, is? The answer is, Reuben thinks we&#039;re idiots, but we&#039;re not. Come on, Reuben, are you saying it was okay to &quot;delete records to clear up space,&quot; which was what was in the investigative report that you used to decide to send Trooper Melvin back to active duty - overseeing the department&#039;s computers? But, it wasn&#039;t okay if the administrative assistant said there wasn&#039;t a space problem. Young, you are an attorney and you should know better. It is a violation of state law to destroy public records, period. The investigative report showed that&#039;s what occurred.  You just thought you could continue the coverup. Remember, Reuben, the coverup is always worse than the crime. Are you still working for Mike Easley?  If you are, and that sure appears to be the case, Bev should show you the door. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:56:52 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>barbie50</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 25084 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Captain&#039;s actions lead to new inquiry</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/captains_actions_lead_to_new_inquiry#comment-25073</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;This lack of confidence applies to the Democratic leadership in the General Assembly. Do you really think the Democrats will not defend their own, even if they know they are corrupt?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 14:47:10 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>PaulTerrell</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 25073 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Jones Street Movie</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/patrol_head_wasnt_ready_to_retire#comment-22177</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;A movie about political inflence in NC State Government:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;By day I run the state and then it&#039;s &#039;Nights in Rodanthe&quot;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 08:25:19 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>domewatcher</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 22177 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Bev Perdue - Jones Street Movie</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/patrol_head_wasnt_ready_to_retire#comment-22167</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Given everyone avoiding questions around Perdue&#039;s past with Glover makes me believe that the rumors about Perdue &amp;amp; the SHP that have floated around for years might just be true.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If Perdue&#039;s tenure as Governor continues to turn into a bigger soap opera than either Edwards, Easley or Sanford, then Hollywood or Wilmington studios will for sure make it into a movie.  The actress they will likely choose to play Beverly is Florence Henderson (mirror images of one another).  Florence is the only one of the two that actually did grow up poor.  And they probably both feel the same age right now:  74&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 14:27:14 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>concerned53</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 22167 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Patrol head wasn&#039;t ready to retire</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/patrol_head_wasnt_ready_to_retire#comment-22164</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Transparency?  Only when it is convenient.  This promotion is strictly political.  Look and Glover&#039;s lack of experience.  SHP is full of corruption.&lt;br /&gt;
What is the connection between the guv and Glover?  Hey...Protzman why don&#039;t you liberals demand transparency.  You only pick and choose your issues.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 12:13:35 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>razor0397</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 22164 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Patrol head wasn&#039;t ready to retire</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/patrol_head_wasnt_ready_to_retire#comment-22162</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The citizens of North Carolina have become accustomed to these type stories coming from Raleigh.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We are fixated on the continuing soap opera and need a weekly installment.  This installment seems to be just another along that long road to the pits and depths of the other side……. the dark side of intrigue, suspense and chicanery.  It is just plain good ol’ fashioned entertainment for the working families who can no longer afford cable or the movies.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I’m thinking we’re ready for a “Jones Street Reality TV Series.”  This story makes it appear that someone has been booted off the island before they were ready to leave.  North Carolina is fast gaining a reputation…….maybe not the reputation we wanted but it’s nice to be noticed.  Stay tuned for another episode.  I’m sure it’s coming soon.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Maybe the film studios who are looking tax breaks will make a movie about North Carolina politics. Maybe &quot;Borat, Part Deux.&quot;  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 10:11:48 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>domewatcher</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 22162 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Patrol head wasn&#039;t ready to retire</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/patrol_head_wasnt_ready_to_retire#comment-22160</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Bev Perdue has the  lowest approval rating of any governess in the USSA.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 22:40:03 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>BitterEXdemocrat</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 22160 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>More answers needed from Perdue</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/patrol_head_wasnt_ready_to_retire#comment-22147</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Too many questions are being raised as a result of Perdue, Young, Wilson, Glover and Chrissy&#039;s no comments.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Why did Glover &quot;retire&quot; 6 months before receiving a great pension for working with the SHP for 30 years?  And why was he replaced with someone from New Bern with limited administrative experience and nominal educational background. What&#039;s the history between Glover and Perdue?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I agree Montcalm, what has happened to Beverly&#039;s promised transparency?  As if she wasn&#039;t creating enough problems for herself already. This is not the time for no comments!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 23:06:24 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>concerned53</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 22147 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Patrol head wasn&#039;t ready to retire</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/patrol_head_wasnt_ready_to_retire#comment-22129</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Where is the Transparency, Bev Perdue?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 12:11:24 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Montcalm</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 22129 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
