<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://projects.newsobserver.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>newsobserver.com projects - National Enquirer - Comments</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/tags/national_enquirer</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;National Enquirer&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Re: Edwards talks about poverty, not affair</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/edwards_talks_about_poverty_not_affair#comment-16969</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I find it hard to take his comments seriously.  That $400 haircut is hard to forget.  And his plush lifestyle.  But he has guts to get back into the fray after what happened.  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 08:39:44 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Prototype</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 16969 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Students line up for Edwards speech</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/students_line_up_for_edwards_speech#comment-16967</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Comments deleted for general tackiness.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;— RTB &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 07:49:30 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ryanteaguebeckwith</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 16967 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Birth certificate does not name father</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/birth_certificate_does_not_name_father#comment-16256</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;If my name is not on the birth certificate, can I still get custody of my child. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:14:24 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>alalcan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 16256 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: John Edwards: ALWAYS a punchline</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/john_edwards_still_a_punchline#comment-15620</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Edwards will always be a punchline!  He cheated on his wife who is struggling with cancer?  He has two little children, a grown daughter, and a son that died as a teen.  This ego maniac thinks he can make a comeback?  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The sad thing is that some lonely woman somewhere, will always be willing to say yes to this loser.  He has left a stain on North Carolina.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mayor Marion Barry, call your office!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 23:45:28 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>kttechwriter</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 15620 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Some Edwards delegates unhappy</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/some_edwards_convention_delegates_unhappy#comment-9224</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Edwards campaign DONORs are asking for their donations to be refunded!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;How&#039;s that going in NC?  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Whats the most efficient way to collect your refunds?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 09:48:27 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>FFC1304</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 9224 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Some Edwards convention delegates unhappy</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/some_edwards_convention_delegates_unhappy#comment-9217</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Not that anyone has spoken about it, b/c everyone assumes all of Edwards delegates will vote for Obama...but they could have real power at the convention if they actually organized and said they would not commit their votes unless demands were met in the platform and elsewhere about issues concerning poverty and health care. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Oh well, a lost opportunity!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 08:56:38 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>captsfufp</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 9217 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: ABC: Enquirer offered sources $50k</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/abc_enquirer_offered_sources_50k#comment-9087</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Did he ask Andrew Young?&lt;br /&gt;
Young&#039;s wife?&lt;br /&gt;
Roxanne Druck Marshall?&lt;br /&gt;
Elizabeth Edwards?&lt;br /&gt;
Rielle?&lt;br /&gt;
Fred Baron?&lt;br /&gt;
Silky Pony&#039;s campaign staff?&lt;br /&gt;
Silky Pony?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I didn&#039;t think so.  None of those people are money grubbers.  Well, except maybe for Rielle.  Oh, and maybe her sister.  Of course most of the others are lawyers, so...damn.  That didn&#039;t work either  Wait!  His staff they were only there because they wanted to ... never mind.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Boy...you really got me with that one.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 09:47:02 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>SpocksBrain</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 9087 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Pearce: Edwards&#039; confession a &#039;failure&#039;</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/pearce_edwards_confession_a_failure#comment-9083</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The Enquirer does have more credibility than Edwards. More than the N&amp;amp;O, too.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But that&#039;s not saying much in either case.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Charlotte Observer beat the pants off the N&amp;amp;O at every turn.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As late as Aug. 8 the N&amp;amp;O was still making the false claim the Enquirer&#039;s July 22 story was anonymously sourced.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And on the front page!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;John in Carolina&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 01:18:18 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jwmakm</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 9083 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: ABC: Enquirer offered sources $50k</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/abc_enquirer_offered_sources_50k#comment-9079</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Ross says that they did ask the question; but wouldn&#039;t use money to entice an answer.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 20:47:56 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>meschreiner</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 9079 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: ABC: Enquirer offered sources $50k</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/abc_enquirer_offered_sources_50k#comment-9072</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Maybe you are at a disadvantage, Ross.  But here&#039;s a clue -- for free.  They ain&#039;t gonna tell you squat if you don&#039;t ask the questions.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 18:30:56 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>SpocksBrain</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 9072 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Edwards&#039; statement on affair</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/edwards_statement_on_affair#comment-8989</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Yes...you can include &quot;poverty pimp&quot; along with Edwards other bogus&lt;br /&gt;
platitudes....none of which anyone with any common sense believed anyway.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 12:34:04 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>mickiep</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8989 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Edwards&#039; statement on affair</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/edwards_statement_on_affair#comment-8978</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I must have missed the part where Edwards claimed to be the &quot;world&#039;s greatest family man.&quot;  Here I was all these months thinking that Edwards was running on a platform focusing on poverty reduction.  Now I learn that he was the first-ever Democrat to be the family values candidate.  I learn new things every day here!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 12:04:31 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>dahedgehog</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8978 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Edwards&#039; statement on affair</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/edwards_statement_on_affair#comment-8973</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;dahedgehog,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am fully aware of McCains infidelity but I do not recall his hypocritcal self promotion as &quot;world&#039;s greatest family man&quot; or the humiliation of his family on a national/world stage like Clinton or Edwards.  Do not assume my blind support of McCain. &quot;Empty suits&quot; can apply across the board.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 11:18:17 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>mickiep</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8973 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Edwards&#039; statement on affair</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/edwards_statement_on_affair#comment-8968</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;mickiep,&lt;br /&gt;
You know John McCain cheated on his first wife, right?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 10:19:22 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>dahedgehog</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8968 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Faircloth: Edwards knows &#039;trash&#039;</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/faircloth_edwards_knows_trash#comment-8967</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;A journalist should ask Faircloth what he thinks of adulterer John McCain.  If Edwards is trash, what does that make McCain?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 10:13:22 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>dahedgehog</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8967 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
