<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://projects.newsobserver.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>newsobserver.com projects - Richard Petty - Comments</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/tags/richard_petty</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Richard Petty&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Re: Marshall running for U.S. Senate</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/marshall_running_for_u_s_senate#comment-25921</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;...and by outstanding caliber, I&#039;m talking about Elaine Marshall!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 16:03:09 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jenthar</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 25921 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Marshall running for U.S. Senate</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/marshall_running_for_u_s_senate#comment-25919</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Why do you conclude that people vote for women solely based on their sex?  So by this reasoning, when people vote for men, it&#039;s simply because they are men, right? This type of simplistic logic is just erroneous (even though there are surely a few that may do this).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think voters, like myself, are increasingly choosing women because so many of the female candidates are competent, fair, and reliable!  Also, they are often not embroiled in a whole lot of ethics violations.  This isn&#039;t to say all women are virtuous and all men are lousy legislators.  Women are still a minority as far as elected officials go in the state and nation as a whole; but the ones that do tend to run and make a difference are often of outstanding caliber!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 16:01:23 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jenthar</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 25919 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Marshall running for U.S. Senate</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/marshall_running_for_u_s_senate#comment-25907</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Hey, if you look at the last election, whether it was governor or city council positions, women always win when up against a man on the ballot. Hopefully that trend of voting for someone because of their sex will end.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 23:57:50 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>im4unc23</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 25907 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Marshall running for U.S. Senate</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/marshall_running_for_u_s_senate#comment-25898</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Isn&#039;t it about time we seriously look at term limits in Congress. Senators get 2 terms if lucky and congress people get 3.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 20:21:15 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>senex24</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 25898 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Marshall running for U.S. Senate</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/marshall_running_for_u_s_senate#comment-25897</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Elaine Marshall is about as close to a &#039;nothing candidate&#039; as you can get.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;yeah and Richard Burr has been a &quot;Ball of Fire&quot;   voting about 95% along party lines. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 20:19:17 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>senex24</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 25897 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Marshall running for U.S. Senate</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/marshall_running_for_u_s_senate#comment-25894</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;With all these democrats running its time for Gerry manding, they like to have the deck stacked by redrawing voting districts. if that fails they can enlist acorn.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 17:27:21 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>henrye</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 25894 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Marshall running for U.S. Senate</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/marshall_running_for_u_s_senate#comment-25890</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Career politicians breed corruption and lies. Vote them out or they and their cronies either die in or retire from office.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Option one.....you win&lt;br /&gt;
Option two.....you lose&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 17:14:38 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Kingixolib</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 25890 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Marshall running for U.S. Senate</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/marshall_running_for_u_s_senate#comment-25887</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;How old is that photograph? The photo on her own campaign website makes her look about ten years older than that photo.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:03:51 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>GrayJ</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 25887 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Marshall running for U.S. Senate</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/marshall_running_for_u_s_senate#comment-25884</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;())))))))  YAWN....and....DOUBLE YAWN  (((((((()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Elaine Marshall is about as close to a &#039;nothing candidate&#039; as you can get.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 15:30:58 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Debrah</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 25884 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Marshall running for U.S. Senate</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/marshall_running_for_u_s_senate#comment-25883</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;If she does not win the Democratic Nomination, then the NCDP is truly a sexist organization.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 15:26:16 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Montcalm</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 25883 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Marshall running for U.S. Senate</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/marshall_running_for_u_s_senate#comment-25881</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Here we go with another government official running for another office without resigning from her current office. She should resign as Secretary of State the day she formally enters the US Senate race. By the way, she&#039;s getting in now to try to keep the other, better candidates out.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 15:10:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>smithfieldsam</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 25881 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Marshall running for U.S. Senate</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/marshall_running_for_u_s_senate#comment-25874</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;And then there will be a candidate who will offer a real alternative to the Twettledumb and Twettledumber professional politicians offered by the  Democratic-Republican duopoly - &lt;b&gt;Mike Beitler&lt;/b&gt; on the &lt;b&gt;Libertarian&lt;/b&gt; ticket. He will announce Sept. 17, fittingly on Constitution Day.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Brian Irving, Press Secretary&lt;br /&gt;
MIKE BEITLER for US SENATE&lt;br /&gt;
www.beitlerforsenate.org&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 13:25:38 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>libertypoint</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 25874 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Marshall running for U.S. Senate</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/marshall_running_for_u_s_senate#comment-25868</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Yawn...what has she done for NC businesses lately?  nothing?  surely you jest, she&#039;s a bailout democrackkk, aint she?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 13:16:56 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>BitterEXdemocrat</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 25868 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Marshall running for U.S. Senate</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/marshall_running_for_u_s_senate#comment-25867</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Mills is brilliant by the way, so how&#039;s Senator Gay Guy doing in the polls?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Oh, that&#039;s right, he LOST and Kay Hagan won.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Huh...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This just in to N&amp;amp;O!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;I had nothing to do with that,&quot; said Thomas Mills, &quot;Plus, this time will be different.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 12:40:54 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>GiggleBox</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 25867 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Bill would give Nascar drivers a break</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/bill_would_give_nascar_drivers_a_break#comment-15758</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;If Nascar gets a break from the rules, who is next?  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:04:13 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>j1c2kp</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 15758 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
