<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://projects.newsobserver.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>newsobserver.com projects - Charlotte-Mecklenburg League of Women Voters - Comments</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/tags/charlotte_mecklenburg_league_of_women_voters</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Charlotte-Mecklenburg League of Women Voters&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Re: WSOC invites Munger to debate</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/wsoc_invites_munger_to_debate#comment-8685</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;BECAUSE THEY ARE COMPLICIT with the controlled AGENDA and CORRUPTION!!!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;THEY defend the activities in many ways, and always have!  Its why we are so thankful for some alternative media now available in our once great state...too bad so many NC voters dont have a clue and remain too ignorantly indoctrinated to find the truth.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 13:32:14 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>FFC1304</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8685 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: WSOC invites Munger to debate</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/wsoc_invites_munger_to_debate#comment-8684</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Good for WSOC! Who says the staid Charlotte media can&#039;t strike a blow for justice and fairness in press and politics every now and then!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Professor Munger will bring along loads of good suggestions about streamlining state government when he visits Charlotte for the debate. And if he has some ideas on how to get the Carolina Panthers back on track in 2008, maybe he could drop those off in the WSOC Sports Department.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In fact, one of these days, they ought to let some sportswriters and sportscasters host a big political debate. This might bring a much-needed deree of politeness, civility and sense of fair play to the proceedings. Can you imagine how nice it would be if a couple of Raleigh&#039;s sports journalism dignitaries served as debate moderators:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[A.J. Carr, The News &amp;amp; Observer]: &quot;Wonder if I could ask you this one question...&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[Tom Suiter, WRAL]: &quot;Let&#039;s go to the videotape! Folks, this could be the Boast of the Day.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;David McKnight&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 04:52:22 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Proctor</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8684 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: WSOC invites Munger to debate</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/wsoc_invites_munger_to_debate#comment-8680</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;Munger is a Duke University professor best known for his comical critiques of the other candidates and their positions.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I know I&#039;ve been kind of picky of your wording lately Ryan, and I realize the &quot;best known&quot; is referring to the what the average voter might know. But this description is both unfair and inaccurate. He&#039;s more than just a professor at Duke, he&#039;s Chair of the Poli Sci Department and he&#039;s got a list of publishing credits that should impress even a seasoned journalist.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Why don&#039;t we help the average voters get to know a little more about this guy?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 21:44:41 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>scharrison</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8680 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: WSOC invites Munger to debate</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/wsoc_invites_munger_to_debate#comment-8679</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;For the record, why didn&#039;t the NC Press (sic) Assn. invite Munger to Asheville?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://charlotte.johnlocke.org/&quot;&gt;JAT&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 20:56:19 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>MeckDeck</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8679 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: WSOC invites Munger to debate</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/wsoc_invites_munger_to_debate#comment-8664</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;He got invited to a debate.  I&#039;m sure that still isn&#039;t good enough for the nuts supporting him, hell they probably want everyone else to raise money for him too since he can&#039;t do it on his own.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 13:06:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>MattM</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8664 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: WSOC invites Munger to debate</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/wsoc_invites_munger_to_debate#comment-8659</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;that should effectively turn the last debate of the cycle into a circus with Munger serving as ringmaster.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;it is too bad he wasn&#039;t invited to all the debates, he could have articulated the libertarian postion and gotten positive attention.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;this debate being his only real chance to garner publicity, he&#039;s going to have to throw political hail marys.  So the debate should be entertaining but not particularly informative regarding Perdue and McCrory&#039;s positions and differences.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 11:04:32 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Senate</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8659 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
