<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://projects.newsobserver.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>newsobserver.com projects - N.C. Libertarian Party - Comments</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/tags/n_c_libertarian_party</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;N.C. Libertarian Party&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Re: More than 1,000 attend Raleigh rally</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/more_than_1_000_attend_raleigh_rally#comment-19557</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;CORRECTION: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;StopNCannexation Coalition had a booth at the Rally.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fair Annexation DID NOT have a booth at the Take Back Our State rally.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 23:10:25 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>cmheath19144</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 19557 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Betts: Straight ticket boosts all parties</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/betts_straight_ticket_boosts_all_parties#comment-13880</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Is this seriously news? Let&#039;s do some more thoughtful math...22% of registration is unaffiliated, and there is no &quot;unaffiliated&quot; straight ticket option. Thus, it&#039;s reasonable to assume, if we are trying to figure out what &quot;their party registration would suggest&quot; that the unaffiliated voters split like the rest of the electorate. Non-unaffiliated voters are registered 58.8% Dem and 41% Rep. 58.8% of the 22% makes a 12.9% of total boost for Dems, and the remaining 9% boost goes to Republicans. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thus we would more or less expect by registration for Democrats to capture 46 + 12.9 = 58.9% (compared to the actual of 58.8% as reported by Betts).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We also would more or less expect by registration for Republicans to capture 32 + 9 = 41% (compared to the actual of 40.4% as reported by Betts).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Betts is wrong, and he uses poor methodology to make his flawed case.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also, an election is a zero sum game. The idea that &quot;Democrats, Republicans and Libertarians benefited from straight-ticket voting&quot; is absurd on its face.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Edit: I just crossposted on Bett&#039;s blog and added this analysis of Libertarians...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Assuming no one switched over (after straight party Dem voting, picking Dole), 57% of Hagan&#039;s votes came from straight party voting. Given a similar assumption, 46.7% of Dole&#039;s votes came from straight party voting. By the same method, 14.3% of Chris Cole&#039;s votes came from straight party voting. By this methodology, it&#039;s clear that Libertarians relied much less on the straight party option than either of the other two parties. I would argue, however, that the difference here between Hagan and Dole (in this methodology) is due to the classic NC scenario of people voting Republican federally and Democratic at the state level (McCain-Dole/DemCouncilofState voters). I would run these numbers for the Governor&#039;s race, but most would agree that the sensation of Dems for McCrory would make them less useful. Thus, I argue that there&#039;s really no news here...just fun numbers and the good life lesson that summary statistics can be very misleading - depending on how carefully they are produced.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 22:53:01 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>wmatthews</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 13880 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Not the droids</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/quotes/not_the_droids#comment-10563</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flickr.com/photos/24973901@N04/2762458387/&quot;&gt;Related&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;— RTB &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 17:37:47 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ryanteaguebeckwith</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 10563 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Not the droids</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/quotes/not_the_droids#comment-10561</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;What if I have Jedi powers? &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 17:30:40 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>maiapinion</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 10561 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Jedi powers?</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/quotes/not_the_droids#comment-10523</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Are &quot;Jedi powers&quot; the same thing as a 527?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 10:48:29 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Prototype</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 10523 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: WSOC invites Munger to debate</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/wsoc_invites_munger_to_debate#comment-8685</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;BECAUSE THEY ARE COMPLICIT with the controlled AGENDA and CORRUPTION!!!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;THEY defend the activities in many ways, and always have!  Its why we are so thankful for some alternative media now available in our once great state...too bad so many NC voters dont have a clue and remain too ignorantly indoctrinated to find the truth.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 13:32:14 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>FFC1304</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8685 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: WSOC invites Munger to debate</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/wsoc_invites_munger_to_debate#comment-8684</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Good for WSOC! Who says the staid Charlotte media can&#039;t strike a blow for justice and fairness in press and politics every now and then!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Professor Munger will bring along loads of good suggestions about streamlining state government when he visits Charlotte for the debate. And if he has some ideas on how to get the Carolina Panthers back on track in 2008, maybe he could drop those off in the WSOC Sports Department.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In fact, one of these days, they ought to let some sportswriters and sportscasters host a big political debate. This might bring a much-needed deree of politeness, civility and sense of fair play to the proceedings. Can you imagine how nice it would be if a couple of Raleigh&#039;s sports journalism dignitaries served as debate moderators:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[A.J. Carr, The News &amp;amp; Observer]: &quot;Wonder if I could ask you this one question...&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[Tom Suiter, WRAL]: &quot;Let&#039;s go to the videotape! Folks, this could be the Boast of the Day.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;David McKnight&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 04:52:22 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Proctor</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8684 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: WSOC invites Munger to debate</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/wsoc_invites_munger_to_debate#comment-8680</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;Munger is a Duke University professor best known for his comical critiques of the other candidates and their positions.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I know I&#039;ve been kind of picky of your wording lately Ryan, and I realize the &quot;best known&quot; is referring to the what the average voter might know. But this description is both unfair and inaccurate. He&#039;s more than just a professor at Duke, he&#039;s Chair of the Poli Sci Department and he&#039;s got a list of publishing credits that should impress even a seasoned journalist.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Why don&#039;t we help the average voters get to know a little more about this guy?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 21:44:41 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>scharrison</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8680 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: WSOC invites Munger to debate</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/wsoc_invites_munger_to_debate#comment-8679</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;For the record, why didn&#039;t the NC Press (sic) Assn. invite Munger to Asheville?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://charlotte.johnlocke.org/&quot;&gt;JAT&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 20:56:19 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>MeckDeck</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8679 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: WSOC invites Munger to debate</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/wsoc_invites_munger_to_debate#comment-8664</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;He got invited to a debate.  I&#039;m sure that still isn&#039;t good enough for the nuts supporting him, hell they probably want everyone else to raise money for him too since he can&#039;t do it on his own.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 13:06:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>MattM</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8664 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: WSOC invites Munger to debate</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/wsoc_invites_munger_to_debate#comment-8659</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;that should effectively turn the last debate of the cycle into a circus with Munger serving as ringmaster.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;it is too bad he wasn&#039;t invited to all the debates, he could have articulated the libertarian postion and gotten positive attention.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;this debate being his only real chance to garner publicity, he&#039;s going to have to throw political hail marys.  So the debate should be entertaining but not particularly informative regarding Perdue and McCrory&#039;s positions and differences.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 11:04:32 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Senate</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8659 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: More than 1,000 attend Raleigh rally</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/more_than_1_000_attend_raleigh_rally#comment-7756</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The $10 was the cost of the Civitas poll luncheon for those that came on the bus from Asheville.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The rally was free.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 15:11:57 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>cthayes75</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 7756 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: More than 1,000 attend Raleigh rally</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/more_than_1_000_attend_raleigh_rally#comment-7743</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The Republican booth was hosted by and manned entirely by the North Carolina Federation of Young Republicans.  I want to thank all those who stopped by.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kim Cotten&lt;br /&gt;
NCFYR, Chair&lt;br /&gt;
kimcottenyr@gmail.com&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 09:12:04 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>KimCotten</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 7743 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Mr Terrell</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/more_than_1_000_attend_raleigh_rally#comment-7735</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I was also at the thinly veiled &quot;conservative, non-partisan&quot; rally and heard nothing but the same tired Republican red meat, over-cooked and past its use by date, from Republican speakers including Phil Berger whining how &quot;Democrats have spent years hiding the numbers from us&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the first quarter alone of 2008 Republican Paul Stam got $31,500 in PAC money including $4,000 each from NC Realtors and NC Homebuilders.  This compares with $18,778 in contributions from individuals.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For the same period Republican Phil Berger pulled in $45,700 from PACs and just $10,100 from individuals.  For the entire election cycle he recorded $91,500 from PACs and $10,350 from individuals.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Dan Blue has a record of contributions from individuals and PACs.  Through the 1st Quarter for the entire election cycle he recorded $18,950 from PACs and $4,200 from individuals.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you want to complain about PAC money, check with your Republican party leaders first.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 23:07:19 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bnartist</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 7735 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: More than 1,000 attend Raleigh rally</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/more_than_1_000_attend_raleigh_rally#comment-7734</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I was at the rally today. What I am running against is Dan Blues&#039; special interest. It is very arrogant of Dan Blue to represent the cities and big business but not the citizens in his district. Take a look at his donations. They are all from PACS like ElectriCities, Time Warner and many others.&lt;br /&gt;
Dan Blue has openly and unconditionally endorsed Barack Obama. Obama has shown that he si not for change but is another typical power hungry politician. Why did Dan Blue file for reelection if he wasn&#039;t sure? I think Dan Blue should seriously think about representing the people in the State House 33 district. I want to retire Dan Blue from public service.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Paul Terrell III&lt;br /&gt;
http://terrellforhouse33.blogspot.com&lt;br /&gt;
Terrell III for State House&lt;br /&gt;
4549 Tollington Dr.&lt;br /&gt;
Raleigh, NC 27604&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 21:43:32 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>tangoz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 7734 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
