<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://projects.newsobserver.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>newsobserver.com projects - censorship - Comments</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/tags/censorship</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;censorship&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Some resources via one of our bloggers</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/n_c_bloggers_and_state_press_law#comment-7171</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://bluenc.com/when-worlds-collide%3A-journalism-and-blogging-in-the-21st-century#comment-97461&quot;&gt;Four good links&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 08:53:10 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>James_Protzman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 7171 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: N.C. bloggers and state press law</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/n_c_bloggers_and_state_press_law#comment-7164</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;This sounds like a great topic for a seminar at ConvergeSouth this year. I wonder if anyone at EGHS would be interested in speaking there?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 22:31:28 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>scharrison</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 7164 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: N.C. bloggers and state press law</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/n_c_bloggers_and_state_press_law#comment-7150</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;This seems like another FOB (fear of bloggers) moment.&lt;br /&gt;
Please note that &#039;bad&#039; lawsuits can and have come from the establishment press as well.&lt;br /&gt;
Of course the NCPA should offer help, advice and a web-based primer on the law here. Sooner than better would be nice.&lt;br /&gt;
I&#039;m waiting for a comments suit that would mess with the ISP/Compuserve shield. That would be nuklear.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 17:18:30 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>rossreport</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 7150 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: N.C. bloggers and state press law</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/n_c_bloggers_and_state_press_law#comment-7146</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Actually, no. The purpose of the group would not be to share risk, but to give advice on avoiding it and dealing with (often empty) threats. The N.C. Press Association does not get sued when the N&amp;amp;O writes something, for example.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Again, I&amp;#39;m not saying that a group is needed. I&amp;#39;m just raising the question. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;— RTB &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 16:02:45 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ryanteaguebeckwith</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 7146 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: N.C. bloggers and state press law</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/n_c_bloggers_and_state_press_law#comment-7145</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;...not everyone has the same financial and institutional backing as a daily newspaper reporter.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This may be naive, but isn&#039;t this relative? What I mean is: wouldn&#039;t increasing the status of bloggers by forming an association make them a more enticing target for civil litigation, as there would be a larger (and more lucrative) &quot;entity&quot; that could be found liable?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 15:00:21 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>scharrison</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 7145 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: N.C. bloggers and state press law</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/n_c_bloggers_and_state_press_law#comment-7137</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Fair enough. I would hope the First Amendment would prohibit any attempts at regulating speech like that.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;— RTB &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 13:42:23 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ryanteaguebeckwith</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 7137 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: N.C. bloggers and state press law</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/n_c_bloggers_and_state_press_law#comment-7136</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Sure,  I seem to remember that once upon a time, Social Security was voluntary, and promised to never rise above 1% of income either. I prefer to nip stuff like this in the bud.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 13:39:35 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ThunderPig</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 7136 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: N.C. bloggers and state press law</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/n_c_bloggers_and_state_press_law#comment-7135</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for responding. I think you misread me. As with the NCPA, the only point would be to offer help to people getting sued, not to enforce any kind of so-called &amp;quot;standards&amp;quot; on bloggers. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;— RTB &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 13:06:24 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ryanteaguebeckwith</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 7135 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: N.C. bloggers and state press law</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/n_c_bloggers_and_state_press_law#comment-7134</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://wnccb.blogspot.com/2008/06/legacy-media-attempts-to-reign-bloggers.html&quot;&gt;No&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If newspapers would report the news, we would be little more than curiosities (I think our influence is highly over-rated). Very few people even read blogs except bloggers, but you guys try to push something like this through; EVERYONE will be reading blogs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is as laughable as expecting us (me especially) to follow a style book.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 12:50:42 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ThunderPig</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 7134 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
