<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://projects.newsobserver.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>newsobserver.com projects - Charles Meeker - Comments</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/tags/charles_meeker</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Charles Meeker&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Re: GOP gloats over Cunningham decision</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/gop_gloats_over_cunningham_decision#comment-27491</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m a Republican looking to go unaffiliated because of this very thing!&lt;br /&gt;
Forget the gloating and sniping.  We elect you to get the job done and the parties are made up of cluesless hacks looking for a fight.  It&#039;s time to earn our votes - As an unaffiliated voter in NC you can choose which party you want to vote for in the May 2010 primaries.  Don&#039;t give them the satisfaction of assuming just because there are this many Dems or RepS I can depend on your vote.   MAKE THEM WORK FOR YOUR VOTE.  REGISTER AS UNAFFILIATED!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 06:58:59 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>rowdyone</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 27491 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: More water for Senate tea leaves</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/more_water_for_senate_tea_leaves#comment-20922</link>
 <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hey DOME...WHEN will you be publishing the LIST of NC Legislators who purposely boycotted the Jesse Helms Honorarium last day or two?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Not that this has anything to do with anything, but I bet you could look up the photos of our legislators and guess.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Jerk.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:44:18 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Gosh</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 20922 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: More water for Senate tea leaves</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/more_water_for_senate_tea_leaves#comment-20919</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Hey DOME...WHEN will you be publishing the LIST of NC Legislators who purposely boycotted the Jesse Helms Honorarium last day or two?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:39:55 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>BitterEXdemocrat</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 20919 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: More water for Senate tea leaves</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/more_water_for_senate_tea_leaves#comment-20860</link>
 <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;That said, Cunningham has a good biography and seems to be exciting the netroots.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Understatement of the year.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And I&#039;m convinced the husband of a Lillian&#039;s List Board Member with his personal story can raise more money than my Grandmother.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;No offense Granny Marshall.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:25:59 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Gosh</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 20860 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Shuler: Not running for Senate</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/shuler_not_running_for_senate#comment-20761</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Tricia Cotham should run so we can see how well her idea about raising taxes flies with both Democrats and then all of NC&#039;s voters if she wins the Democratic nomination.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 21:08:54 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>PaulTerrell</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 20761 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Shuler: Not running for Senate</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/shuler_not_running_for_senate#comment-20729</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Don&#039;t want to say I told you so but I told yall so...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 16:51:21 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>CitizenOpinionated</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 20729 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Shuler: Not running for Senate</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/shuler_not_running_for_senate#comment-20718</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Shuler is a gentleman and has more in common with Burr than he does with the liberal NC Democrat apparatchiks.  I&#039;m glad to see he&#039;s standing by his word.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 13:58:24 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>cdtew</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 20718 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Shuler: Not running for Senate</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/shuler_not_running_for_senate#comment-20714</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Why would Schuler (or any other sitting member of the US House) want to give up a sure seat for what is going to be a very hard race to win. Regardless of what the PPP polls say, Burr has a solid track record, a strong campaign organization, a solid base, and very low negatives!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Schuler seat - and maybe even the McIntire seat could easily go Republican and the dems would not only lose the Senate race, but two house seats! &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 13:52:52 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>mfenley</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 20714 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Tea leaves on the U.S. Senate race</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/tea_leaves_on_the_u_s_senate_race#comment-20050</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I believe the backlash will be against the Democrats this time. Look at their out of control spending and of course Obama and his left hand turn in his political decisions. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 14:04:38 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>PaulTerrell</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 20050 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Tea leaves on the U.S. Senate race</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/tea_leaves_on_the_u_s_senate_race#comment-20037</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Someone always files, but it&amp;#39;d be pretty unusual for an incumbent senator in an already beleaguered party to face a serious threat. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;— RTB &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 11:40:22 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ryanteaguebeckwith</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 20037 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Tea leaves on the U.S. Senate race</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/tea_leaves_on_the_u_s_senate_race#comment-20035</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Any chance of a Republican primary RTB? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Some conservative tea bagging patriot loyal to the real Republican Party over Bush ideology could may much hay against bank bailout Burr.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 11:35:24 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Gosh</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 20035 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Tea leaves on the U.S. Senate race</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/tea_leaves_on_the_u_s_senate_race#comment-20032</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Summary appreciated. I was getting whiplash.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One note on this:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s not yet clear what their strategy would be against Burr.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hard to say how one might cast Karl Rove&#039;s last CAFTA recruit of the Bush era.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Relevant&quot; isn&#039;t an adjective that comes to mind.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 11:03:19 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Gosh</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 20032 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: If not Cooper, then who?</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/if_not_cooper_then_who#comment-19954</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Why not give Easley a try, he is a great model for the democrat party in north carolina, and he could teach those boys and girls in DC alot about corruption. I think he would fit right in with that crowd.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 21:40:33 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>mountainman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 19954 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: If not Cooper, then who?</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/if_not_cooper_then_who#comment-19934</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Lets plea to the dems to sit one out and spare us of their BS for once.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 17:25:21 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>BitterEXdemocrat</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 19934 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: If not Cooper, then who?</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/if_not_cooper_then_who#comment-19901</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;basnight&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 14:30:02 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>PoliticalJunkie</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 19901 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
