<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://projects.newsobserver.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>newsobserver.com projects - Senate &amp;#039;10 - Comments</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/tags/senate_10</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Senate &#039;10&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Re: Money request rankles lobbyists</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/money_request_rankles_lobbyists#comment-27729</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Minnie - You&#039;ve chosen to ignore a fairly key component of the discussion.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The only thing the lobbyists in question apparently signed up for was their registration with Marshall&#039;s OFFICE.  She REGULATES them.  She determines whether or not they can do whatever it is they do.  And now she&#039;s using that list, an official state resource, to send emails asking for money.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Oh well.  Its not like she flew around the state with Governor Easley on campaign trips or anything, right?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:52:56 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>SaintPinehurst</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 27729 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Money request rankles lobbyists</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/money_request_rankles_lobbyists#comment-27725</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Lobbyists receive invitations to fundraisers from legislators all the time. Why doesn&#039;t this &quot;rankle&quot; them?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 13:45:59 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>minnie</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 27725 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Money request rankles lobbyists</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/money_request_rankles_lobbyists#comment-27718</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Career politicians breed corruption and lies. Vote them out or they and their cronies either die in or retire from public office.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Option one....you win&lt;br /&gt;
Option two....you lose&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 06:05:15 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Kingixolib</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 27718 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Marshall = Sleeze</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/money_request_rankles_lobbyists#comment-27717</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Elaine Marshall, just another good old gal.  She likes to think she&#039;s above all the dirt and sleeze, but here she is, being caught again, right back in the mud.  We can do without another Democrat victory in 2010.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:19:24 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>kttechwriter</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 27717 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Money request rankles lobbyists</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/money_request_rankles_lobbyists#comment-27716</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Mr. Mills says: &quot;they had some sort of relationship with Secretary Marshall in the past.&quot; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mr. Mills means: &quot;they provided their email address to Secretary Marshall when they registered with the Secretary of State&#039;s Office.&quot; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;How many other times has Secretary Marshall emailed those people?  Is this really the first time its happened?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;We&#039;d be glad to remove their names&quot; doesn&#039;t address how they got on the list in the first place.  We&#039;re talking about official state resources... her office regulates lobbyists... and the implication is pay-to-play...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:17:11 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>SaintPinehurst</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 27716 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Money request rankles lobbyists</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/money_request_rankles_lobbyists#comment-27709</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;How old did she turn?   Time for new photos?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:50:55 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>BitterEXdemocrat</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 27709 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Money request rankles lobbyists</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/money_request_rankles_lobbyists#comment-27708</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Nothing like Busch league campaigning to inspire the DSCC to come here and spend the $10MM it will take to beat Burr. Here’s hoping that the campaign can get it together before the end of the 4th Quarter.  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:27:45 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>whatsnext</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 27708 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Wicker is out</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/wicker_is_out#comment-27638</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Could this be a divine plan?  If no one will accept then who is left?  Could this be the time for John to make his comeback?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think he would be a sure thing.  John is for the poor people.  At the rate Obama is going we will all be poor by the time the election rolls around.  Obama&#039;s lack of economic policies means that the only ones who will not be poor will be those on government bailouts. If we are all poor then John gets all the votes.  John will fight for the poor!  We need someone fightin&#039; for us! &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The failure of any Democrats to step up and run against Burr is obviously some type parable or omen or low pressure system.  The poor will always be among us!  John is the only one who cares for the poor!  Let&#039;s send Burr out on Sarah&#039;s bus!  End illegal parking!  Stand up for the poor!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 07:31:53 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>domewatcher</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 27638 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Wicker is out</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/wicker_is_out#comment-27635</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;How bout RC Soles?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 07:03:50 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>BitterEXdemocrat</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 27635 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The depth chart is looking bleak.</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/wicker_is_out#comment-27624</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The first string is out, the second string is out, the third string is out. The taxi squad left in a Yellow Cab.  As Brad Pitt, playing Achilles, said:  &quot;Is there no one else?&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There&#039;s always Bobby Boucher.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:55:43 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>domewatcher</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 27624 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Wicker is out</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/wicker_is_out#comment-27620</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Here comes Cal&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:17:53 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>GrayJ</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 27620 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Dome memo: Ethics and fence-sitting</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/dome_memo_ethics_and_fence_sitting#comment-27534</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;Hard work, perseverance and positive attitude will be rewarded. And if that doesn&#039;t work, a nice crisp $20 couldn&#039;t hurt.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At least the twenty bucks is reasonable.  Seems like state govenment payoffs cost a little more than that.  I don&#039;t mind the payoffs but couldn&#039;t we regulate them.  If the state would follow the suggestions of these kids then the price of payoffs would come down!  We are in a recession for heaven&#039;s sake!  Consult these children for an appropriate amount.  Show some mercy during these tough economic times.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;P.S.  You know of course that &quot;hard work, perseverance and positive attitude&quot; does not always work in politics and government.  Keep a roll of those crisp $20 handy just in case.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 11:16:38 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>captainjack</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 27534 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Poll: Burr&#039;s numbers up slightly</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/poll_burrs_numbers_up_slightly#comment-27529</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;giggles &quot;you do know that Senator Burr is our ONLY voice in the senate that voted FOR Bush&#039;s Wall Street Bailout.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And your point is?&lt;br /&gt;
And who are you calling a &quot;yankee&quot;?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 09:08:23 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Dogbyte</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 27529 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Poll: Burr&#039;s numbers up slightly</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/poll_burrs_numbers_up_slightly#comment-27527</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;there&#039;s not a qualified democrackkk in NC to run...thank God.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 06:32:20 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>BitterEXdemocrat</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 27527 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Poll: Burr&#039;s numbers up slightly</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/poll_burrs_numbers_up_slightly#comment-27524</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Dogbyte, you do know that Senator Burr is our ONLY voice in the senate that voted FOR Bush&#039;s Wall Street Bailout.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Once you grow up and get adult jobs, you won&#039;t be so off hand about throwing all your tax money away to the lazy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Goldman Sachs wasn&#039;t lazy? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On behalf of the good people we grow in small towns, up yours Yankee.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 22:39:53 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>GiggleBox</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 27524 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
