newsobserver.com projects - Jack Cipriani - Comments

Re: Change to Win on Hagan robocalls

bnartist — Fri, 03 Oct 2008 08:24:17 -0400

All unions? That's a pretty sweeping statement. You must have some special knowledge of unions that you keep under your tinfoil stash.

By the way how's the fundraising going? You certified to the State Board of Elections that you "intend to neither receive nor expend more than $3,000 during the current election cycle" yet you actively solicit contributions of up to $4,000.

Re: Change to Win on Hagan robocalls

tangoz — Thu, 02 Oct 2008 23:43:56 -0400

All unions are in favor of NOT having secret ballot elections to determine if workers want a union at their workplace.

This is not only Anti-American, it is a form of intimidation and exhortion. I am a high tech maintenance worker who understands what it takes to make a living. I get paid by the hour and live the middle class dream. I am for unions getting a fair shot with SECRET BALLOTS to determine unionization or not. I will never get union or quasi-union endorsements because I support the hard working Americans not the Union and their Democratic bosses.

My opponent is out there campaigning for Obama instead of seeking out the needs of district 33's voters.

Paul Terrell III
http://terrellforhouse33.blogspot.com

Re: Change to Win on Hagan robocalls

ryanteaguebeckwith — Thu, 02 Oct 2008 21:41:46 -0400

Comment deleted for reposting.

— RTB