<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://projects.newsobserver.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>newsobserver.com projects - Claims Dept. - Comments</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/tags/claims_dept_0</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Claims Dept.&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Re: Claims Dept.: Obama on stimulus</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/claims_dept_obama_on_stimulus#comment-23608</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Big Government......big mistake! Mounting national debt......our children&#039;s burden.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Healthcare reform......who you kidding, the federal government can&#039;t run anything effectively. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 18:41:14 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jimcope</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 23608 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Claims Dept.: Obama on stimulus</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/claims_dept_obama_on_stimulus#comment-23574</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Actually, .... they&#039;ve created a huge amount of additional debt and they&#039;ve stimulated ...... what? If they&#039;re doing such a fine job stimulating with borrowed money, why isn&#039;t everyone standing in line to loan us some more? Am I missing something?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 16:06:43 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>oneshotwataw</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 23574 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Claims Dept.: Obama on stimulus</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/claims_dept_obama_on_stimulus#comment-23559</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The framing of this item suggests that the reality is quite different from what the president stated. It would appear from the details you&#039;re reporting, however, that the president&#039;s claims are close to the actual conditions. Is there a problem here, or are you just trying to conjure one up?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 15:33:25 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>nycnc62</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 23559 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Claims Dept.: Obama on stimulus</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/claims_dept_obama_on_stimulus#comment-23557</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Actually, that&#039;s not true.  But thanks for trying -- your one shot missed.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 15:32:23 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>nycnc62</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 23557 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Claims Dept.: Obama on stimulus</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/claims_dept_obama_on_stimulus#comment-23555</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Economics 101: The government can&#039;t &quot;stimulate&quot; anything effectively with &quot;borrowed&quot; money.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 15:27:53 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>oneshotwataw</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 23555 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Claims Dept.: Obama on stimulus</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/claims_dept_obama_on_stimulus#comment-23522</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Informed, I&#039;m going to give you a free economics lesson:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;GDP = C + I + G + (X − M) where C (Consumption), I (Investment), G (Government spending) and X − M (Net Exports).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The goal of the stimulus is/was to boost GDP above where it would otherwise be.  Decreasing G would lower GDP and thereby be counter-productive to the goal of providing a short-term increase to GDP.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:14:34 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>dahedgehog</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 23522 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Claims Dept.: Obama on stimulus</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/claims_dept_obama_on_stimulus#comment-23514</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The stimulus is only prolonging the inevitable if taxes and spending aren&#039;t reduced significantly and substantially.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 13:52:05 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>informed</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 23514 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Claims Dept.: Obama on stimulus</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/claims_dept_obama_on_stimulus#comment-23509</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;He also said that one third of the stimulus went to middle-class taxpayers in the form of lower income taxes.  Another third went to emergency relief for people who might otherwise be destitute, on the street, in soup lines:  including a one-year extension of unemployment benefits, increase in the food stamp benefit fund, mortgage reworking and such.  The final third is going to infrastructure projects.   If not for the stimulus package, I daresay the US would look like it did in The Great Depression.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 13:26:42 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>SusanBAnthony</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 23509 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
