<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://projects.newsobserver.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>newsobserver.com projects - Cary Chamber of Commerce - Comments</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/tags/cary_chamber_of_commerce</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Cary Chamber of Commerce&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Re: Price defends earmarks in Cary</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/price_defends_earmarks_in_cary#comment-4792</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Agreed with your comment mwilbert and would go further that Price&#039;s comment demonstrates his fiscal laziness.  In corporate America, during lean times or during times when better financial performance is requested from shareholders, the mandate from management soon becomes &quot;buckle up&quot; and &quot;everything is under review&quot;.  In terms of earmarks, Price should focus NOT on this being 1 percent of the budget (with 1 percent of budget still being a HUGE dollar amount) but on the message that taxpayers are saying (we should be viewed as shareholders and &quot;owners&quot;) that we want better financial performance and more effective government.  Bottom line, how about shaving 5% from every government program and demand less waste and more productivity.  If average Americans are being asked to produce this kind of value, then we should expect nothing less from our government.  Mr. Price, how about some leadership and more bigger picture thinking?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 00:41:48 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>robwald</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 4792 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Price defends earmarks</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/price_defends_earmarks_in_cary#comment-4777</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Did he really include Social Security in his list of &quot;spending problems&quot;?  Didn&#039;t he read the trustees&#039; report yesterday?  Social Security is solvent.  The trust fund has enough money to pay full benefits until 2041, according to current projections.  And there&#039;s ample reason to believe that those projections are overly pessimistic.  The actuarial balance has been improving, and is now better than it’s been since 1993. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Certainly Dr. Price is too smart to have made such a mistake.  Or has he really been duped by the right wing&#039;s scare tactics on this issue?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 14:18:47 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>dahedgehog</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 4777 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Price defends earmarks in Cary</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/price_defends_earmarks_in_cary#comment-4769</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Price arrogantly says, &quot;....the money would be appropriated anyway.&quot; That&#039;s because he knows he is in a position to ensure that our money is there for him and his cronies to spend.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And it will be spent without an individual vote on the merits of the project; bundled with thousands of other &quot;worthy&quot; projects costing us hundreds of millions of our hard-earned dollars.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The &quot;everybody&#039;s doing it&quot; defense only works on the schoolyard Rep. Price. You should be ashamed of your arrogance.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 09:25:03 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>mwilburt</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 4769 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
