<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://projects.newsobserver.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>newsobserver.com projects - Cory Booker - Comments</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/tags/cory_booker</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Cory Booker&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>To my knowledge.</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/jindal_booker_to_speak_tonight#comment-15557</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;:)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 17:25:23 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>James_Protzman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 15557 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Jindal, Booker to speak tonight</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/jindal_booker_to_speak_tonight#comment-15556</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;Tickets are $60.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sixty dollars? Who&#039;s opening up for him, the Goo Goo Dolls? It better not be Mike Huckabee&#039;s Rockabilly Nightmare Band, or I&#039;m walking (running) right out the door.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Tell you what, Francis. Get me a free ticket for the dinner, seat me close to John Hood so I can badger him a little, let me borrow your laptop so I can live-blog the thing, give me half of your filet, and I&#039;ll say something nice about JLF. Like, &quot;they&#039;re not all crazy&quot; or something along those lines.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We have to stick together now with this whole blog libel thing happening.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 17:17:34 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>scharrison</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 15556 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Personal destruction?</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/jindal_booker_to_speak_tonight#comment-15550</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Pointing out an elected official&#039;s actual positions on public policy is &quot;practicing the politics of personal destruction&quot;?  Wow. That&#039;s bringing right wing winery to a whole new level.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 16:29:54 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>James_Protzman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 15550 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Jindal, Booker to speak tonight</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/jindal_booker_to_speak_tonight#comment-15545</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Oh, Fran,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you need therapy from everything we&#039;ve learned from Carter and Jesse, I&#039;m sure someone could ask Jindal to speak on tax breaks for spiritual mind healing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Could that stimulate the economy?  By voodoo, we&#039;ve found a solution!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 14:09:23 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>cornbread</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 15545 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Jindal, Booker to speak tonight</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/jindal_booker_to_speak_tonight#comment-15543</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Really glad to see the politics of personal destruction is no longer being practiced...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 13:48:03 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>fxdeluca</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 15543 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Maybe an exorcism at Duke - doctors present?</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/jindal_booker_to_speak_tonight#comment-15539</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Governor Exorcist is speaking near a North Carolina medical school tonight!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;http://www.newoxfordreview.org/article.jsp?did=1294-jindal&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If he does any faith healing, I hope the doctors at Duke watch and learn.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;JLF bloggers, please report if Governor Exorcist cures your ills.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Can&#039;t wait to see your next speaker!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 13:09:35 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>cornbread</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 15539 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Jindal</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/jindal_booker_to_speak_tonight#comment-15536</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Good to see the GOP leadership getting refocused on its shrinking &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thenation.com/doc/20080721/fernandes&quot;&gt;reactionary roots&lt;/a&gt; with this anti-science Creationist.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Jindal&#039;s slim record as a Congressman from 2005 to 2008 is a window into this staunch conservatism. In that time he missed 427 of 2,398 votes (18 percent); GovTrack.us, the nonpartisan website that tracks elected officials&#039; participation, gave Congressman Jindal a rating of &quot;Exceedingly Poor relative to peers.&quot; Nevertheless, Jindal&#039;s religious bias and radical-right politics are evident in the votes he did cast. He voted no on a bill to amend the federal definition of a hate crime to include sexual orientation and gender identity. He also voted against reauthorizing and expanding the State Children&#039;s Health Insurance Program (S-CHIP). Not surprisingly, he voted against stem-cell research. He has been an advocate of teaching creationism over evolution and has passionately spoken up for this cause. Jindal has voted against a woman&#039;s right to an abortion every chance he has had, including a vote against allowing overseas military personnel the ability to use their own money to obtain abortion services in overseas military hospitals. He also voted for a bill that would require abortion providers to tell patients that an unborn fetus experiences pain during an abortion. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://bobbyjindalsucks.blogspot.com/&quot;&gt;And then there&#039;s this, just for fun.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 12:21:02 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>James_Protzman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 15536 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Obama&#039;s surrogates in N.C.</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/obamas_surrogates_in_n_c#comment-6225</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The NObama woman rang my doorbell today!  She left with an EAR FULL!!!  She couldnt leave fast enough!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 21:21:14 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>FFC1304</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 6225 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Surrogate Smackdown: North Carolina</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/surrogate_smackdown_north_carolina#comment-5398</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Who&#039;s the Mayor of Detroit, Mr. Kwami Kilpatrick stumpin for?  He oughtta draw a big crowd, or maybe Eliot Spitzer?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 13:32:06 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>FFC1304</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 5398 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Young Democrats convention begins</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/young_democrats_convention_begins#comment-4862</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Young skulls full of mush being molded into democrat systematic corruption in NC.  STRIVE to be SMARTER, young democrats, for you know not what they do to you, NOR what they have done to NC for the past 40 years.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 09:21:41 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>FFC1304</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 4862 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Carville, Edwards to talk to Young Dems</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/carville_edwards_to_talk_to_young_dems#comment-4726</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;John Edwards is a leader in every sense of the word--he leads in integrity, character, and service to his country.  Though not running for president right now, he is involved in leading the Democrats towards the values we once used to hold dear--standing up for working class and poor families, ending the corruption in our government, and having the government work for the people, not the corporations.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Right now, John and Elizabeth are involved in the Iraq/Recession Campaign, and in getting more progressives elected to Congress.  They are truly dedicated to serving their country and making it a better world for us all.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 00:03:36 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>kakiem</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 4726 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Carville, Edwards to talk to Young Dems</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/carville_edwards_to_talk_to_young_dems#comment-4723</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Right.  You&#039;d prefer a candidate who never admitted making a mistake.  Someone like Dubya.&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, I think a lot of people care what Edwards has to say.  He&#039;s an extremely bright guy, a good guy, and anything but an empty suit.  You&#039;re either not listening or incapable of comprehending what you hear. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 18:09:13 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Isaac136</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 4723 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Carville, Edwards to talk to Young Dems</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/carville_edwards_to_talk_to_young_dems#comment-4721</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I care a great deal about what John Edwards has to say. Obviously so do Obama and Clinton. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I hope he does not endorse. Why should he support either one of those children.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The big news here should be John Edwards to speak to young Dems. Who better. Oh yeah, James Carville is big in the news now.&lt;br /&gt;
He is no role model. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 15:46:40 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>krissiee</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 4721 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Carville, Edwards to talk to Young Dems</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/carville_edwards_to_talk_to_young_dems#comment-4718</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;As an Edwards supporter, I am baffled by his remaining neutral and keeping alive the rumor that he may support Clinton, whose motives for trying to get nominated seem alien to what propelled Edwards to run for the nomination. Like some others, I am repelled by the possibility of his endorsing Clinton. For many of us the choice before Edwards dropped out was either Edwards or Obama, so alike in their compassionate, non-oppotunistic views and commitments. An 86 year-old non-crank who distrusts but does not hate Hillary Clinton, I would hate to lose trust in John and Elizabeth Edwards.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 13:49:10 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>matkeats5</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 4718 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Carville, Edwards to talk to Young Dems</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/carville_edwards_to_talk_to_young_dems#comment-4717</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Does anyone really care what Edwards has to say?  I&#039;m sure whatever he says will be recanted and regretted a few years later just like his few votes he made in the senate.  Empty suit.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 13:23:25 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ejtaylor822</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 4717 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
