<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://projects.newsobserver.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>newsobserver.com projects - Oprah Winfrey - Comments</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/tags/oprah_winfrey</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Oprah Winfrey&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Re: Edwards drama too much info?</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/edwards_drama_too_much_info#comment-19532</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;One just needs to study the timeline to see where the blame lies. You need to actually ask a tough question of gary since he knew what kind of man Edwards really was.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 12:50:13 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>PaulTerrell</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 19532 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Relationship status: It&#039;s complicated</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/relationship_status_its_complicated#comment-19404</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Gosh, watch the personal attacks. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;— RTB &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 08:11:24 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ryanteaguebeckwith</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 19404 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Relationship status: It&#039;s complicated</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/relationship_status_its_complicated#comment-19395</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Was this the first time Johnny cheated on Elizabeth?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 20:54:12 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>MarcusTC</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 19395 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Relationship status: It&#039;s complicated</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/relationship_status_its_complicated#comment-19394</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Ryan, didn&#039;t she cover up her husband&#039;s cheating on her during his run for the presidency? Why didn&#039;t you mention that? &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 20:24:02 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>PaulTerrell</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 19394 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Relationship status: It&#039;s complicated</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/relationship_status_its_complicated#comment-19376</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Free advertising for the book...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 14:26:57 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>j1c2kp</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 19376 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Relationship status: It&#039;s complicated</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/relationship_status_its_complicated#comment-19375</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;But, Ryan, let&#039;s admit it --- she would not be either an author or a health advocate --- doubtful that she would be published or anyone would give a rip about what she says about health care, if she wasn&#039;t married to John Edwards. The both of them have capitalized on their way more than 15 minutes of fame.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Both of the Edwards just need to fade away and deal with their personal issues. I&#039;m just tired of them and anything they have to say. What&#039;s worse is that they are leaving a lovely set of articles for their children to have, detailing their marital mess. It would be bad enough to be a small child with a gravely ill mother. But, it is worse to be a small child whose friends get to read about the whole tragic mess in the newspaper or by watching Oprah. Are both of these people so seriously self-centered that they can&#039;t see that?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This isn&#039;t political on my part. I usually think of myself as a Democrat, but both of these folks sicken me. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m sorry that Mrs. Edwards is sick, but she also kept up this whole silly charade, which wasn&#039;t good for the Democratic party. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 14:21:07 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>barbie50</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 19375 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Relationship status: It&#039;s complicated</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/relationship_status_its_complicated#comment-19374</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Oh, RTB, you don&#039;t get any love from the readers, do you?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 14:09:32 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>cdtew</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 19374 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Relationship status: It&#039;s complicated</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/relationship_status_its_complicated#comment-19373</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Your beef today, then, is with Oprah and Edwards herself.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;— RTB &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 13:59:52 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ryanteaguebeckwith</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 19373 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Relationship status: It&#039;s complicated</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/relationship_status_its_complicated#comment-19372</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;My apologies.  She is an author and a health advocate.  I guess I missed that part of her background since all of your posts seem to focus on her love life rather than her work as an author or as a health advocate.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 13:44:33 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>dahedgehog</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 19372 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Relationship status: It&#039;s complicated</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/relationship_status_its_complicated#comment-19371</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;She is a nationally known author and health care advocate who lives in Chapel Hill. I submit that describing her only as the &amp;quot;wife of a former politician&amp;quot; is a bit of an understatement. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;— RTB &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 13:42:19 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ryanteaguebeckwith</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 19371 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Relationship status: It&#039;s complicated</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/relationship_status_its_complicated#comment-19369</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;You seem to spend a lot of time blogging about this particular wife of a former politician.  It seems weird.  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 13:30:08 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>dahedgehog</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 19369 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Elizabeth Edwards interviewed by Oprah</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/edwardses_interviewed_by_oprah#comment-18180</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I, now, believe more and more that people are&lt;br /&gt;
being paid to go around and post negative comments about John Edwards. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 13:44:24 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Cherubim</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 18180 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Elizabeth Edwards interviewed by Oprah</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/edwardses_interviewed_by_oprah#comment-17941</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Did Edwards show any baby pictures?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 06:59:51 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>FFC1304</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 17941 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Dole among Gallup&#039;s most admired women</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/dole_among_gallups_most_admired_women#comment-9742</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The poll is of Americans, but the admirees can be from anywhere in the world and have included Benazir Bhutto, Margaret Thatcher and Mother Teresa.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;— RTB &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 17:56:54 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ryanteaguebeckwith</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 9742 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Dole among Gallup&#039;s most admired women</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/dole_among_gallups_most_admired_women#comment-9739</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting that the ad running on TV says top 10 in the world and cites Gallup.  Is that the case?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 17:18:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>fhblack</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 9739 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
