newsobserver.com projects - Reuben Young - Comments

Re: Governor's counsel: No comment

Isaac136 — Fri, 07 Mar 2008 21:46:06 -0500

Oh fer cryin' out loud, FCC. You're always screechin' and wailin'. Let me break it to you gently -- you don't speak for "the rest of" anyone.

Dang. I've been reading your rants for months and the strongest feeling any of your "comments" has provoked in me is a concern for your blood pressure. Calm yer butt down and do some push-ups or something. You're probably a right nice feller but someone needs to shove a chill pill down your throat.

Yes, the Democrats have some issues to deal with here, but good lord, look at the national picture and tell me what a great job the Republicans have done.

Do you want to say Bush has been an asset to your party?

Re: Governor's counsel: No comment

FFC1304 — Fri, 07 Mar 2008 19:04:22 -0500

Hope all you democrats are happy with your 'leaders', cause the rest of us aint!

Re: Governor's counsel: No comment

MeckDeck — Fri, 07 Mar 2008 17:03:38 -0500

Unless you are a US Attorney and have someone under oath, you ain't gonna get a straight answer out of this bunch.

JAT

Re: Governor's counsel: No comment

Isaac136 — Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:02:18 -0500

Yeah, Young's letter speaks for itself all right. It says "You can't prove we did it!"

No, but Easley knows, the capital press corp knows, and state employees certainly know that the governor's office has a way of communicating what it wants you to do without being direct. State employees also know that if they speak out about it, they stand a very good chance of losing their jobs.

Re: Governor's office finds no evidence

Isaac136 — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 07:46:08 -0500

Geez, "Wayne," you figure it's "sour grapes" on the part of the newspaper because the newspaper was denied access to information that we are all entitled to? Do you even understand what Aesop's fable of the "sour grapes" was about?

If I understand you, and I'm not sure I do, you seem to be suggesting that the newspaper is, in effect pouting because the state's top executive is not honoring the spirit or letter of the state's law on open records.

Don't know about you, Wayne, but I'd kind of like to hear the governor answer a few questions about this.

Re: Governor's office finds no evidence

trebenson — Wed, 05 Mar 2008 23:51:47 -0500

I have run into this before with local officials. When looking at email records of public officials you would think you would find your own email sent the day before but not in most of the cases I've worked. One official had one side of a two sided email exchange, another only had spam in his email vault. And yet they all claim nothing had been deleted.

A common practice among savvy public officials is to create a hotmail or yahoo email box, separate and apart of their official email account to harbor secret exchanges.

But really, who is going to stop them? Better yet, who would ever punish them?

Re: Governor's office finds no evidence

FFC1304 — Wed, 05 Mar 2008 21:51:07 -0500

I dont believe a word that comes out of Sleazy's office NOR his own mouth.
SUCH an inept 'leader' NC has never had prior to now. I hope you democrats are proud of this jerk.

Re: Governor's office finds no evidence

WayneUber — Wed, 05 Mar 2008 21:01:28 -0500

Is this all related to "sour grapes" because the N&O didn't get access to clemency records? Or is the N&O sore about something else?

http://www.newsobserver.com/news/sunshine/story/620782.html

... maybe. This reader thinks so.