<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://projects.newsobserver.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>newsobserver.com projects - push polling - Comments</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/tags/push_polling</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;push polling&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Re: Is Perdue push-polling? (Campaign: No)</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/is_perdue_push_polling#comment-4274</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I agree with Towns that this is not responsible reporting.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The article should give the reader the information in-text they need to decide for themselves the answer to the question at the top &quot;Is Perdue Push Polling?&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Blogger says yes, campaign says no&quot; doesn&#039;t cut it.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Such an article should include an in-text definition of push polling, and either some sort of assessment about whether or not the poll meets that definition (it&#039;s not bias or rocket science) or some assessment by experts.  All this provides is &quot;he said, she said.&quot;  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The article leaves readers with the definite impression that this was in fact a push poll run by Perdue that a goodhearted citizen journalist discovered, and that the campaign is just denying it.  A finger-wag for the Dome on this one.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 08:41:37 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>twoshadesofblue</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 4274 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Towns: When is a poll pushing?</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/towns_when_is_a_poll_pushing#comment-4273</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Not a good poll, but not a sleazy &quot;push poll.&quot;  Read the JOMC blog linked above (or google &quot;push poll&quot;).  These are all legitimate questions for the campaign to determine whether their free book campaign was successful and what the views are of their supporters (and non-supporters) with regard to controversial questions.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 08:27:12 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>twoshadesofblue</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 4273 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Here are some poll questions from Fred Smith</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/towns_when_is_a_poll_pushing#comment-4265</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Here are the questions from a Fred Smith poll I got a few weeks back.  I wrote them down as quick as I could.  Not sure if this is a push poll, but I didn&#039;t think it was too scientific to have the questions end with &quot;do you intend to vote for Fred Smith for Governor&quot;.  For the record, I said I was voting for Smith, although I am currently undecided. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Do you vote in North Carolina?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Do you intend to vote in Republican primary for governor in 2008?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If your choices for Governor are Fred Smith, Bob Orr, Pat McCrory and Bill Graham, do you intend to vote for Fred Smith for Governor?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; Now, if your choice for governor was only between 2 candidates, Fred Smith and Pat McCrory, would you vote for Fred Smith?     &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Recently, Fred Smith mailed you a free book entitled a little extra effort, did you receive your free copy of the book?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Have you had an opportunity to read it?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Would you like a copy of it?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Are you Pro Life?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Do you believe marriage is between one man and one woman? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Do you support your taxes not being raised and possibly cut? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Do you believe that illegal immigration a problem?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Do you support the 2nd Amendment and the right to bear arms?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Then it asked a bunch of questions about age, sex, and things like that. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 17:10:43 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>newbernbear</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 4265 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Is Perdue push-polling? (Campaign: No)</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/is_perdue_push_polling#comment-4258</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;That&#039;s not push-polling. No, seriously. It&#039;s not. I don&#039;t know who they&#039;re polling for, but this is a legitimate poll.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;TDM is the call center wing of The Tyson Organization, a political polling and voter contact firm that has done work here on behalf of the NC Association of Realtors, Rep. Etherige and others. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;http://www.tyson.org/&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;and&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;http://tinyurl.com/39skte&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 12:57:58 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>liam</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 4258 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: A new weapon against push polls</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/a_new_weapon_against_push_polls#comment-3929</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Don&#039;t be a rotter, man.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 19:09:52 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bnartist</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3929 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: A new weapon against push polls</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/a_new_weapon_against_push_polls#comment-3928</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt; I wrote down the questions of Walter Jones&#039; taxpayer funded poll.  Ryan, can I send them to you for your story or should I just send it to Mark and Karen?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 17:37:47 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>GOPWIN08</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3928 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: A new weapon against push polls</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/a_new_weapon_against_push_polls#comment-3927</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Too bad we don&#039;t have a device on Walter Jones office and others in DC that use &quot;constituent calls&quot; and &quot;franked mail&quot; for blatent campaigning with our tax dollars. Push polls probably inform the ingnorant voter more often than not of the real facts. You sure won&#039;t get that from the liberal media, the N &amp;amp; O is no exception. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 17:19:50 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Wildgoose</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3927 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: A new weapon against push polls</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/a_new_weapon_against_push_polls#comment-3924</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Wow. I wish you would have given me this idea before Walter Jones did his poll a few weeks ago. Only problem was that it was paid for with taxpayer  money!  It asked questions that you couldn&#039;t help but agree with him with.  Yeah, that would have been a great piece for Under the Dome.  I&#039;ll  rush out and get my recorder.  Keep up the good work Ryan.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:32:43 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>obxsurfergirl</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3924 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
