<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://projects.newsobserver.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>newsobserver.com projects - Insurance Commissioner &amp;#039;08 - Comments</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/tags/insurance_commissioner_08</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Insurance Commissioner &#039;08&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Re: Libertarians announce slate of candidates</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/libertarians_announce_slate_of_candidates#comment-7889</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;NC Libertarians: Where Every Voter is a Candidate!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 14:12:48 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>dahedgehog</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 7889 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: State recognizes Libertarians as party</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/state_recognizes_libertarians_as_party#comment-6840</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;Libertarians Recognized By State Board of Elections&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;   Coming Soon:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Charlotte Recognized by State Democratic Party&quot;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 21:59:36 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Proctor</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 6840 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: State recognizes Libertarians as party</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/state_recognizes_libertarians_as_party#comment-6836</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;that would seem logical, but then this is NC, forever democrackkk controlled.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 19:06:16 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>FFC1304</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 6836 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: State recognizes Libertarians as party</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/state_recognizes_libertarians_as_party#comment-6833</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;So can voters register as Libertarian once again?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://charlotte.johnlocke.org/&quot;&gt;JAT&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 17:18:30 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>MeckDeck</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 6833 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>you can&#039;t always tell gender from name</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/a_natural_experiment_on_down_ballot_races#comment-6491</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;We also know that among low- to medium-information voters, one of the only things you can tell about a candidate from looking at the ballot is gender. (You cannot necessarily do the same with race.)&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ha, when I was working at an early voting site in 2004 for the Wake County Board of Elections, one of my tasks on a rotating basis was to assist voters who were having trouble marking their ballots.  One elderly lady had a list with her, said she was having trouble filling in the boxes, and asked me to mark in the choices.  She volunteered to me that other than president, she was voting ONLY for women. (I did not ask her any questions, she was chatty so I listened.)  One of the choices she had me mark was for a candidate whose first name was &quot;Kris&quot;. That Kris is male.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 12:06:14 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>gercohen</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 6491 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: A natural experiment on down-ballot races</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/a_natural_experiment_on_down_ballot_races#comment-6490</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;You&amp;#39;re right. Still, among low-information voters, two women would cancel each other out a little, I think.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;— RTB &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 11:47:39 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ryanteaguebeckwith</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 6490 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: A natural experiment on down-ballot races</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/a_natural_experiment_on_down_ballot_races#comment-6489</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;insurance commissioner and labor commissioner. Coincidentally, those were two races with no female candidates&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Actually, Labor Commissioner had two female candidates.  One of them, Mary Fant Donnan, will advance to a runoff.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 11:26:36 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>awbeal</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 6489 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Undecided leads Council races</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/undecided_leads_council_races#comment-5470</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;It would help if you provided a link to who is running for these offices. Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 09:16:20 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>DotCommons</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 5470 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Goodwin&#039;s TV ad</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/goodwins_tv_ad#comment-5305</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you, liam!  I am quite pleased with the work of my media team ... and especially pleased by the response to my TV ad&#039;s message.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In response to your question, my TV ad has been running already on various networks in North Carolina for approximately one week (maybe more).  And, of course, there are always more networks and channels!  This being the very first campaign to opt into the pilot public financing program for Insurance Commissioner, funds for all participating candidates during both the primary election and the general election are limited/capped ... by State law.  We may use up to the maximum funds allowed by the public financing law.  Admittedly, the cap is too low for full media output.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also, this TV ad has been getting lots of play via hits on my campaign website and other sites, etc., that have been kind enough to include it as part of their voter education efforts.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fortunately, a great many organizations and political groups have been inviting 1, 2 or all 3 candidates for candidates&#039; fora during the last month.  Some of these various folks have also videotaped remarks from 1, 2 or all 3 candidates for playback before their groups and/or on websites.  Their efforts are also key factors in the necessity of enhancing and promoting voter education regarding the Insurance Commissioner candidates.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For more detailed information about my campaign and the deep, broad and diverse array of endorsements of my candidacy, please go to www.waynegoodwin.org ... You will see that the contrast between the Goodwin for Insurance Commissioner campaign and the opposing camp is quite great.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 23:42:31 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Wayne_Goodwin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 5305 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Goodwin&#039;s TV ad</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/goodwins_tv_ad#comment-5300</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Good ad. Does Wayne Goodwin have enough money to buy air time?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 18:04:26 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>liam</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 5300 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Equality NC announces endorsements</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/equality_nc_announces_endorsements#comment-5276</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Sorry for the delay with this post. It was supposed to go up last week.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;— RTB &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 09:44:54 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ryanteaguebeckwith</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 5276 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Long not running for re-election</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/long_not_running_for_re_election#comment-4238</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I agree.  Why not use &quot;unsuccessful&quot; instead of &quot;failed&quot;?  &quot;Failed&quot;, though technically accurate, seems a little subjective for a news reporter.  Even &quot;lost&quot; sounds better and more objective than &quot;failed.&quot;  By the way, Wayne Goodwin ran a terrific campaign in 2004, and had a fantastic campaign team.  He campaigned in every county (unlike his opponent), had bipartisan support, and outfundraised his opponent, who happened to be the only statewide incumbent Republican at the time.  But for the less-than-expected percentages for the Kerry-Edwards presidential campaign in NC, then Goodwin and several of the down-ballot Council of State races would have reversed in 2004 and been in the Democratic column.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 17:05:32 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ymorris2</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 4238 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Long not running for re-election</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/long_not_running_for_re_election#comment-4236</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;We can only guess who and how many would have filed to run if Long had made this announcement in the clear and before the start of the filing season instead in its final hours.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:15:15 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>meschreiner</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 4236 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Two more last-minute filings</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/two_more_last_minute_filings#comment-4234</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Wayne will be great.&lt;br /&gt;
Good luck Wayne.&lt;br /&gt;
eugene&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:37:19 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ebarx</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 4234 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>&quot;By&quot; Jove</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/long_not_running_for_re_election#comment-4233</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I think you&#039;re right. I withdraw my confusion.  (It was pretty funny though.)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:16:09 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Anglico</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 4233 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
