newsobserver.com projects - Sandra Spaulding Hughes - Comments

Re: Keep it civil

FFC1304 — Thu, 28 Aug 2008 18:26:44 -0400

Consider it an honor...spelling it with 3 Ks HONORs the democrackkk heritage as the ORIGINAL 'party' of SLAVERY, as they continue to ENSLAVE us daily, especially in NC!!!

Re: Keep it civil

lefaim — Thu, 28 Aug 2008 16:48:47 -0400

Insert the "I will when he will". When someone spends every comment comparing me and my party to the KKK its deeply offensive, not just because I am jewish. So until FFC is banned, I will continue to insult if its justified. And his lies justify it.

Keep it civil

bniolet — Thu, 28 Aug 2008 10:34:13 -0400

Please avoid getting personal in the comments.

— Ben Niolet

lefaim, you are speaking Latin to a pig.

zoobatmania — Thu, 28 Aug 2008 08:32:00 -0400

You're talking about facts, neocons don't believe in facts, just truthiness.

Keep it up FFC, keep lying through your teeth, only God will judge you for being a liar.

Re: Who voted 'no?'

lefaim — Wed, 27 Aug 2008 20:43:27 -0400

You are an idiot.

8 people voted against this bill in the house. Jones was the only one in the senate (with the pairing.

That means of the NINE people who voted against the veto override, ALL NINE were Democrats. Zero. Let me repeat. ZERO Republicans voted against the veto override. Oh, and the bill was initially vetoed by Mike Easley, a Democratic Governor who you have repeatedly lampooned.

You are a fool.

Re: Who voted 'no?'

FFC1304 — Wed, 27 Aug 2008 18:46:37 -0400

WHY is this bill the one that gets attention when SO many other issues are WAY more important? Just goes to show ya the mentality of democrackkk crooks...somebody needs a payoff here...I suspect its Sleazely.

Re: Hughes to replace Wright in House

quiana7 — Wed, 09 Apr 2008 23:40:14 -0400

I am delighted for Hughes and her family. The change will be welcomed. Since I've had the pleasure of working with her grandchildren, I know that educational programs are of importance to her.

Re: Wright's replacement timeline

Proctor — Fri, 21 Mar 2008 01:19:38 -0400

As far as getting a fair criminal trial is concerned, Brother Wright should have at least the same rights as the Wright Brothers would have had.

Re: Wright's replacement timeline

ryanteaguebeckwith — Thu, 20 Mar 2008 15:53:00 -0400

That's a pretty hypothetical question. Even if they did, the House could just expel him again, and if he's convicted of a felony, he's disqualified.

— RTB

Re: Wright's replacement timeline

cthayes75 — Thu, 20 Mar 2008 15:47:26 -0400

Ryan,

Can the committee nominate Wright to fill the term?