<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://projects.newsobserver.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>newsobserver.com projects - N.C. Automobile Dealers Association - Comments</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/tags/n_c_automobile_dealers_association</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;N.C. Automobile Dealers Association&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Re: Report: Dealers&#039; loans predatory</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/report_dealers_loans_predatory#comment-19140</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Dealers hardly make money on the car itself anymore, but rather the debt associated with the car.  That&#039;s why there&#039;s more innovation in finding ways to rack up your debt (and their commission), than to make a better and more fuel-efficient car.  No wonder Chrysler is bankrupt!  That&#039;s why this legislation makes perfect sense to level the playing field for the little guy.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 09:58:25 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>knowledge100</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 19140 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Report: Dealers&#039; loans predatory</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/report_dealers_loans_predatory#comment-19111</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;NO CONSUMER PROTECTION IN THIS STATE......AND THE LOWERED THE COPERATE TAX RATE AND RAISED THE PERSONAL RATE.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WHAT A GREAT STATE !!!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 19:51:10 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>radioman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 19111 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Nitpick</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/report_dealers_loans_predatory#comment-19094</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Fair enough.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;— RTB &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 15:54:31 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ryanteaguebeckwith</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 19094 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Nitpick</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/report_dealers_loans_predatory#comment-19091</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Dealers&#039;, not Dealer&#039;s.  I clicked on the link thinking one particular dealer had been targeted as predatory.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 15:47:38 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>baconm</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 19091 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Bill: State prefers more efficient cars</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/bill_state_prefers_more_efficient_cars#comment-18884</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;It is probably wise of the NCADA to remain neutral right now given the car scandal involving Easley.  Still waiting to hear if Tony Rand should be driving a loaner.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank you Pricey for sponsoring the bill.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:02:29 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>j1c2kp</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 18884 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: 2007: Banner year for state lobbying</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/2007_banner_year_for_state_lobbying#comment-17635</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#39;s based on the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.secretary.state.nc.us/lobbyists/&quot;&gt;official reports&lt;/a&gt; filed by lobbyists with the Secretary of State. As I&amp;#39;ve noted in the past, those reports don&amp;#39;t include payments made for non-lobbying — the so-called &lt;a href=&quot;/blogs/arnold_close_consulting_loophole&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;consulting loophole.&amp;quot;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That said, the Democracy N.C. report is a fair reflection of what the lobbyists themselves reported. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;— RTB &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:19:46 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ryanteaguebeckwith</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 17635 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: 2007: Banner year for state lobbying</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/2007_banner_year_for_state_lobbying#comment-17634</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I haven&#039;t seen anything regarding the methodology of this study and an analysis of the validity of the methodology.  Can anyone help?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:14:25 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>PoliticalJunkie</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 17634 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

