<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://projects.newsobserver.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>newsobserver.com projects - Historic Union Baptist Church - Comments</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/tags/historic_union_baptist_church</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Historic Union Baptist Church&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Re: Moore: Death penalty for &#039;biblical evil&#039;</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/moore_death_penalty_for_biblical_evil#comment-3614</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;It makes me cringe.  It&#039;s vile.  I don&#039;t know which is worse:  his saying it to pander or his actually believing that crap. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 11:33:56 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Isaac136</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3614 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Moore: Death penalty for &#039;biblical evil&#039;</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/moore_death_penalty_for_biblical_evil#comment-3611</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Does this kind of talk by our politicians and leaders not make anyone else cringe? Biblical evil? I don&#039;t think anyone is really paying attention. If we were a thinking people, these charlatans and hucksters would not have a chance. I wonder how many politicians that make these types of statements actually believe what they are saying.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CC&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 08:55:06 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ConcernedCitizen</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3611 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Moore: Death penalty for &#039;biblical evil&#039;</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/moore_death_penalty_for_biblical_evil#comment-3607</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Biblical evil? This man is not fit for a leadership position in a secular government based on separation of church and state (maybe he should see if Iran needs a new leader--I hear the current one is losing the mullahs&#039; favor). Of course, that applies to most of the other Dem and GOP candidates, too. Munger (the Libertarian candidate) may be personally religious, but at least he&#039;s ethical and intelligent enough to not use religious rationale for his policy positions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Darren&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a&gt;nocoercion.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 15:42:58 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>nocoercion_dot_com</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3607 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
