<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://projects.newsobserver.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>newsobserver.com projects - Virginia Tech - Comments</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/tags/virginia_tech</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Virginia Tech&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Re: Hagan: Ban texting while driving</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/hagan_ban_texting_while_driving#comment-23607</link>
 <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Pretty dumb if you ask me. Every state has a law already, called  INATTENTIVE DRIVING!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Maybe they should add one about closing bold text html.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 18:27:42 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>GiggleBox</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 23607 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Driving while impaired</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/hagan_ban_texting_while_driving#comment-23605</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I would have thought the Driving while impaired law would cover that and all the nearly blind folks riding around all night and day with there normal and bright headlights on? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I guess I have read the DWI charge is totally tossable these days. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I guess keeping ones eye&#039;s on the road and hands upon the wheel doesn&#039;t filter the roadway insanity these days. How about a double life sentence for texting with highbeams on in broad daylight?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 18:22:14 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>dlhertzberg</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 23605 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Hagan: Ban texting while driving</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/hagan_ban_texting_while_driving#comment-23604</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Pretty dumb if you ask me.  Every state has a law already, called &lt;b&gt; INATTENTIVE DRIVING!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 18:20:03 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>sixnine</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 23604 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Hagan: Ban texting while driving</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/hagan_ban_texting_while_driving#comment-23590</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;There is an old adage about not being able to legislate good taste...Let&#039;s see if we can do something about common sense! &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 16:59:45 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>w5708</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 23590 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Hagan: Ban texting while driving</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/hagan_ban_texting_while_driving#comment-23589</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;There is an old adage about not being able to legislate good taste...Let&#039;s see if we can do something about common sense! &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 16:59:44 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>w5708</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 23589 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Hagan: Ban texting while driving</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/hagan_ban_texting_while_driving#comment-23561</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Two bills at the State Level to Ban Texting:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Senate Bill 96 http://www.ncleg.net/gascripts/BillLookUp/BillLookUp.pl?Session=2009&amp;amp;BillID=S96&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Senate Bill 22 http://www.ncleg.net/gascripts/BillLookUp/BillLookUp.pl?Session=2009&amp;amp;BillID=S22&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Both are counterparts to House Bill 9&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;NYT Article on Texting while Driving http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/28/technology/28texting.html&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;N&amp;amp;O article that stae hands-free may be no better than using a handheld phone http://www.newsobserver.com/politics/story/1615191.html&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 15:38:15 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Penny_Wise</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 23561 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Hagan: Ban texting while driving</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/hagan_ban_texting_while_driving#comment-23558</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I notice once again that the proposal is to use blackmail, loss of federal highway funds, in order to run around the 10th Amendment.  Our elected representatives have such total disregard for the US Constitution!  Sen. Hagan should be ashamed.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 15:32:31 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>profbam</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 23558 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Hagan: Ban texting while driving</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/hagan_ban_texting_while_driving#comment-23551</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The bill doesn&#039;t go far enough. All hand held devices (i.e phones) should be banned. Force the use of hands free devices. at 65 mph I want the person behind me looking at nothing but the road ahead. It only takes a second to slam into the car in front of you at that speed. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 15:14:38 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jcaptain</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 23551 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Hagan: Ban texting while driving</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/hagan_ban_texting_while_driving#comment-23528</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I get a sense from this...&lt;br /&gt;
A sense of what doesn&#039;t make sense.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ll wager more accidents involve illegal aliens than text messaging - so what&#039;s that about? &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:22:11 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>robdarich</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 23528 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Hagan: Ban texting while driving</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/hagan_ban_texting_while_driving#comment-23527</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;People! We have laws against reckless driving!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:21:05 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>landshark</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 23527 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Hagan: Ban texting while driving</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/hagan_ban_texting_while_driving#comment-23525</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Man! Could two more brain dead women get elected? If you text in your car, why support a bill to band it? This bill probally has ears marks out the butt!!! That&#039;s why!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:18:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>landshark</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 23525 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Many states already have</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/hagan_ban_texting_while_driving#comment-23517</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Many states already have this law including NC going into effect soon:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/perdue_signs_texting_ban&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:00:23 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>swisspfau</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 23517 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Hagan: Ban texting while driving</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/hagan_ban_texting_while_driving#comment-23508</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Another &quot;do as I say, not as I do&quot; scenario.  To admit doing this and then saying that everyone has done it is a lousy cop out.  We need to ban this, but when owning up to something, don&#039;t bring everyone down with you.  I feel so sorry for this state.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 13:17:07 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>vance203</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 23508 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Hagan: Ban texting while driving</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/hagan_ban_texting_while_driving#comment-23505</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Senator Hagan, you have my full support to ban texting while driving! Thank you....Thank you...Thank you! &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 12:53:34 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>nickrupp</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 23505 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Two thirds opposed Sunday hunting in &#039;06</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/two_thirds_opposed_sunday_hunting_in_06#comment-15726</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;It is about time North Carolina opened up Sunday Hunting and got  on board with the 43 states that offer Sunday Hunting.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Acoording to the National Safety Council hunting is one of the safest activities one can do in the outdooors.  You have .001 chance out of 100,000 of getting shot by a hunter&#039;s arrow or bullet in the outdoors.  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 09:50:54 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>cflay1</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 15726 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
