<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://projects.newsobserver.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>newsobserver.com projects - Board of Elections - Comments</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/tags/board_of_elections</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Board of Elections&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Fess up N&amp;O-Fairness is Expected</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/election_official_mccrory_reports_complete#comment-9657</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;You published a story criticizing the McCrory campaign without getting the facts and it would have only taken a phone call to the Board of Elections.  North Carolina&#039;s voters deserve better.  You can start by posting a retraction not only on this website but more importantly, in your newspaper&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And how about doing some research on the real story about Beverly&#039;s contributors involved in possible payoffs regarding the ethanol plant!  A state employee is in jail because of this.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 17:40:35 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>concerned53</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 9657 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>News &amp; Observer Truly Does Owe McCrory an Apology</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/election_official_mccrory_reports_complete#comment-9654</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I hope the N&amp;amp;O can print an article explaining this situtaion promptly&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 16:29:21 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>alterac</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 9654 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Election official: McCrory reports complete</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/election_official_mccrory_reports_complete#comment-9652</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Amen &quot;concerned 53&quot;.  The N&amp;amp;O does owe an apology but McCrory will never get one because the &quot;Old Faithful&quot; is in full campaign mode and tailors the headlines and stories to help their beloved liberal democrats. One would think that if they had any credibility they would pursue Pander Bear Perdue&#039;s  delinguent reports but don&#039;t hold your breath.  Selective relevance and indignation is the order of the day at this rag.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 15:34:39 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>sweetsea</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 9652 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>McCrory reports complete-Retraction is owed by N&amp;O</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/election_official_mccrory_reports_complete#comment-9651</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;This is an example of incomplete, if not biased reporting by Benjamin Niolet and the Raleigh News &amp;amp; Observer.  Did the reporter or his editors even bother to verify the missing donor information with anyone at the Board of Elections?  Did you talk with Kim Strach last week before writing this article or did Beverly tell you to write this non-story so she might try to discredit Mayor McCrory?  Was Beverly&#039;s missing information over 2 years also due to computer glitches (not) or real concerns?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Take some personal responsibility for not uncovering the truth for this story.  Your readers are owed a retraction for this poor example of shoddy journalism!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 15:12:12 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>concerned53</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 9651 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
