<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://projects.newsobserver.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>newsobserver.com projects - Walter Mondale - Comments</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/tags/walter_mondale</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Walter Mondale&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Re: Hunt: Father of the superdelegates</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/hunt_father_of_the_superdelegates#comment-3980</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;At the time of the 1984 Democratic convention, polling had Mondale running behind Reagan by 17%, while Hart was only 4% behind Reagan. So, obviously, it wasn&#039;t about electability. Let&#039;s hope the superdelegates don&#039;t make a similarly stupid decision this time.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 10:19:01 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Tomas</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3980 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: GOP&#039;s delusional plan for 2008?</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/blogs/gops_secret_plan_for_2008#comment-2103</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;That&#039;s a wonderful plan, unfortunately it doesn&#039;t match up with reality. Rasmussen polling from the end of October shows that Sen. Clinton does rather well in several southern states, one of them being North Carolina.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The specifics on NC from Rasmussen:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Clinton earns 43%-44% of the vote when matched against Giuliani, Thompson, or McCain. That’s enough for the former First Lady to be tied with Thompson (44% -44%) and McCain (43% - 43%) while trailing Giuliani by just a single percentage point (44% - 43). She does just a bit better against Mitt Romney, leading the former Governor of Massachusetts 46% to 41%.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here&#039;s the link: http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_2008__1/2008_presidential_election/north_carolina/north_carolina_2008_presidential_election&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 18:55:46 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>persondem</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2103 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: GOP&#039;s secret plan for 2008?</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/blogs/gops_secret_plan_for_2008#comment-2098</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;And those are, not coincidentally, the same years, and the only years, that we have elected a Republican governor.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I assume Bill G. means the only years in his memory.  Let&#039;s not forget Republican Governors W.W. Holden (elected 1868), Tod Caldwell (elected 1872) and Daniel L. Russell (elected 1896).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also, while Bill has a point, there is also evidence to the contrary.  In 2000 and in 2004, Al Gore and John Kerry, respectively, did about as well or worse in NC than Mike Dukakis did in 1988.  And yet, Easley was elected both years.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 12:42:30 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>awbeal</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2098 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
