<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://projects.newsobserver.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>newsobserver.com projects - Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians - Comments</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/tags/eastern_band_of_cherokee_indians</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Re: Senators seek Lumbee recognition</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/senators_seek_lumbee_recognition#comment-26596</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;While I don&#039;t really have a dog in this fight I would like to point out to the last poster that saying &quot;yes&quot; DOES take something away from others, if it opens up a whole new group to get preferential treatment in Federally funded programs, including college space/money.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 10:02:50 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>StatesRights</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 26596 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Senators seek Lumbee recognition</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/senators_seek_lumbee_recognition#comment-26590</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;This group of decent people deserves the rights of other native American groups. Saying &quot;No&quot; to them rejects the best of America&#039;s hard-working, decent folks.  Saying &quot;yes&quot; takes nothing from anyone. Native Americans are among the best of out best, and the Lumbee are Native Americans of the first order. Reject anyone like the Lumbee and you reject the greatest strengths and widsdom of our land.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 23:51:13 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>yarghy</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 26590 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Senators seek Lumbee recognition</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/senators_seek_lumbee_recognition#comment-26588</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I thought the whole point behind being Lumbee was not being recognized?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Are these time wasting, elected officials, going to reopen the trail of tears for official business also?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 22:27:42 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>dlhertzberg</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 26588 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Senators seek Lumbee recognition</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/senators_seek_lumbee_recognition#comment-26582</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The reason the legislation has not passed for over 50 years is that nobody can figure out just exactly what a &quot;Lumbee&quot; Indian is.  And still can&#039;t.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 19:49:42 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>PercyKution</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 26582 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Judge knew when to fold&#039;em</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/judge_knew_when_to_foldem#comment-16293</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;One should remember Judge Manning&#039;s order is not binding precedent.  Other Superior Court Judges may rule the opposite until the Court of Appeals or Supreme Court rule on this.  Therefore, poker machine operators might be in peril to operate here.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 08:35:46 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>windjay</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 16293 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Perdue raised $17.8m by end of &#039;08</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/perdue_raised_17_8m_by_end_of_08#comment-14825</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m so glad that we&#039;re getting change!  I thought the Republicrats were s&#039;posed to be the party of Big-Bad-Business?  Seems like Bev has made some very rich friends!  Is it still called prostitution if a person-of-questionable moral character is hired by others to pork US?  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:13:48 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ThoughtCrimes</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 14825 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Thanks for the correction on the $88K.</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/dalton_raised_855_000_by_end_of_2007#comment-3654</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;n/t&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 21:14:22 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Anglico</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3654 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Nevermind</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/dalton_raised_855_000_by_end_of_2007#comment-3652</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I checked them too. You got it right.  Big money from big bidness. That pretty much sez it all.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 19:02:04 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Anglico</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3652 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Dalton raised $855,000 by end of 2007</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/dalton_raised_855_000_by_end_of_2007#comment-3651</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Are these numbers right?  Let&#039;s do some double checking.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(Question from Robert at &lt;a href=&quot;http://bluenc.com/open-thread-44#comment-79136&quot;&gt;BlueNC&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 18:48:20 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Anglico</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3651 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Young raised $449,000 by end of 2007</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/young_raised_449_000_by_end_of_2007#comment-3597</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;another corrupt democrackkk...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 20:12:08 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>FFC1304</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3597 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Questions about Cherokee contributions</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/blogs/questions_about_cherokee_contributions#comment-1772</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;What about the payoffs by the tobacco lobby to the republican party????&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 12:17:09 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>riverrd</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1772 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
