<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://projects.newsobserver.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>newsobserver.com projects - pensions - Comments</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/tags/pensions</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;pensions&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Re: Cowell: Pension fund down 19 percent</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/cowell_pension_fund_down_19_percent#comment-15150</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;It is true that many people have invested unwisely in the past eight years. That includes those involved in the management of the State Employees Pension Fund.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 17:08:07 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>htkirbys</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 15150 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Cowell: Pension fund down 19 percent</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/cowell_pension_fund_down_19_percent#comment-15145</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Eight years, that is a familiar time span.  In the past eight years, our fund and our children&#039;s funds have dropped.  We invest with a very conservative brokerage firm.  It would be very hard to get around a loss while invested in funds.  The only bump in the last eight years &quot;was&quot; real estate.    &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 11:10:35 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>greenswamp</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 15145 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Cowell: Pension fund down 19 percent</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/cowell_pension_fund_down_19_percent#comment-15144</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;these same critics would be complaining that the fund had grown too slowly.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Too slowly? It has not grown at all in eight years. It has lost money. To judge performance over two or even three years might be unfair. Eight years and no gain indicates bad judgment.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 10:43:47 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>htkirbys</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 15144 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Cowell: Pension fund down 19 percent</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/cowell_pension_fund_down_19_percent#comment-15143</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The pension fund is down due to a national economic downturn.  This drop is a result of the diversified investments in the fund, some agressive, some safer.  Had the fund not carried some agressive investments, these same critics would be complaining that the fund had grown too slowly.  As our national government has been in a mostly Republican stranglehold for the last eight years, if there is any blame to pass around for this, it should fall at their feet.  I&#039;ll take the mostly Democrat-run state management,thank you. While not perfect, it sure seems better in comparison.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 10:04:39 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>greenswamp</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 15143 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Cowell: Pension fund down 19 percent</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/cowell_pension_fund_down_19_percent#comment-15139</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The State Pension Plan still has too much of their funds invested in equities. If you believe this $17 billion loss was significant, just wait for the market to lose another 3,000 to 4,000 points. Remember 11/4/2008....the day the Obama stock market crash began. The stock market value is merely a reflection on the future economy under democratic leadership.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 22:32:05 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>IKWUM</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 15139 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: htkirbys  - Come out from behind the curtain</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/cowell_pension_fund_down_19_percent#comment-15136</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Who is Charles Heatherly?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:45:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>htkirbys</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 15136 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Cowell: Pension fund down 19 percent</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/cowell_pension_fund_down_19_percent#comment-15135</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;that weasel, mike easley is to blame!!!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:43:23 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>saltydawg1</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 15135 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: htkirbys  - Come out from behind the curtain</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/cowell_pension_fund_down_19_percent#comment-15129</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s a simple fact of simple arithmetic. The state pension fund is worth less than it was eight years ago.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:19:18 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>htkirbys</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 15129 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>htkirbys  - Come out from behind the curtain</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/cowell_pension_fund_down_19_percent#comment-15125</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Htkirbys sounds remarkably uninformed, ridiulously passionate in his distaste for Mr. Moore, and quite the fan of Mr. Boyles.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hmmm, there is something familiar sounding about all this.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Could htkirbys be &lt;a href=&quot;http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/heatherly_hits_moore_again&quot;&gt;Charles Heatherly&lt;/a&gt;, a long time Moore critic and former employee of Boyles?  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The old dog needs to find a new bone.  The pension fund shines when compared to its peers in down markets.  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 18:53:54 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>cabotdog</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 15125 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Cowell: Pension fund down 19 percent</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/cowell_pension_fund_down_19_percent#comment-15124</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Lost in all this dialogue is the fact that although the state legislature is exempt from paying any social security tax for its employees as it was to pay into its retirement account, it has not and currently pays no matching percentage into what has become an entirely worker funded retirement plan.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All this back and forth about Richard Moore is wasted breath. What other employer do you know gets away with this type of behavior? IF they were matching the STate Employees mandated contribution (yes they have no choice in contributing or how much to contribute) the fund would be in fine shape.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 18:45:30 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Dmchenry</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 15124 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Cowell: Pension fund down 19 percent</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/cowell_pension_fund_down_19_percent#comment-15122</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;lot of defense stocks in the portfolio&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 17:25:47 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>AquaMan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 15122 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Cowell: Pension fund down 19 percent</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/cowell_pension_fund_down_19_percent#comment-15118</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, facts are facts. And the fact is that there is less money in the fund than there was eight years ago.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 16:46:19 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>htkirbys</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 15118 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Cowell: Pension fund down 19 percent</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/cowell_pension_fund_down_19_percent#comment-15115</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;What&#039;s not said here is the justification (given such great losses) of Cowell&#039;s predecessor doubling the salaries of the Chief Investment Officer and two Investment Directors just prior to leaving office. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 15:36:41 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Taxpayer</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 15115 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Cowell: Pension fund down 19 percent</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/cowell_pension_fund_down_19_percent#comment-15111</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I guess you&#039;re having a hard time, some of you, with the fact that our state pension fund is either the healthiest or the second healthiest (I forget which) in the country.    Go ahead and hate on Richard Moore all you want to, but facts are facts. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 14:38:39 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Isaac136</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 15111 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Cowell: Pension fund down 19 percent</title>
 <link>http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/cowell_pension_fund_down_19_percent#comment-15110</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;She is.  She&#039;s also smart and capable and will make this state proud.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 14:36:38 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Isaac136</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 15110 at http://projects.newsobserver.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
